These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

130 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26950387)

  • 21. The specificity of perceptual learning in speech processing.
    Eisner F; McQueen JM
    Percept Psychophys; 2005 Feb; 67(2):224-38. PubMed ID: 15971687
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Language familiarity modulates relative attention to the eyes and mouth of a talker.
    Barenholtz E; Mavica L; Lewkowicz DJ
    Cognition; 2016 Feb; 147():100-5. PubMed ID: 26649759
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Heeding the voice of experience: the role of talker variation in lexical access.
    Creel SC; Aslin RN; Tanenhaus MK
    Cognition; 2008 Feb; 106(2):633-64. PubMed ID: 17507006
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. EEG activity evoked in preparation for multi-talker listening by adults and children.
    Holmes E; Kitterick PT; Summerfield AQ
    Hear Res; 2016 Jun; 336():83-100. PubMed ID: 27178442
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. The Potential Role of Talker Age in the Perception of Regional Accent.
    Shin W; Lee H; Shin J; Holliday JJ
    Lang Speech; 2020 Sep; 63(3):479-505. PubMed ID: 31288603
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Acoustic correlates of female confidence: A production and comprehension study.
    Roche JM; Morgan SD; Fissel Brannick S; Bryndel K
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2019 Jun; 145(6):3410. PubMed ID: 31255138
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Interaction of bottom-up and top-down neural mechanisms in spatial multi-talker speech perception.
    Patel P; van der Heijden K; Bickel S; Herrero JL; Mehta AD; Mesgarani N
    Curr Biol; 2022 Sep; 32(18):3971-3986.e4. PubMed ID: 35973430
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Acoustic differences, listener expectations, and the perceptual accommodation of talker variability.
    Magnuson JS; Nusbaum HC
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2007 Apr; 33(2):391-409. PubMed ID: 17469975
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Rapid Influence of Word-Talker Associations on Lexical Access.
    Kim J; Drager K
    Top Cogn Sci; 2018 Oct; 10(4):775-786. PubMed ID: 29900689
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Listeners track talker-specific prosody to deal with talker-variability.
    Severijnen GGA; Bosker HR; Piai V; McQueen JM
    Brain Res; 2021 Oct; 1769():147605. PubMed ID: 34363790
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. The effect of exposure to a single vowel on talker normalization for vowels.
    Morton JR; Sommers MS; Lulich SM
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2015 Mar; 137(3):1443-51. PubMed ID: 25786955
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Effects of age on speech and voice quality ratings.
    Goy H; Kathleen Pichora-Fuller M; van Lieshout P
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2016 Apr; 139(4):1648. PubMed ID: 27106312
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Effects of talker variability on perceptual learning of dialects.
    Clopper CG; Pisoni DB
    Lang Speech; 2004; 47(Pt 3):207-39. PubMed ID: 15697151
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. On the perception of similarity among talkers.
    Remez RE; Fellowes JM; Nagel DS
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2007 Dec; 122(6):3688-96. PubMed ID: 18247776
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Clearly, fame isn't everything: Talker familiarity does not augment talker adaptation.
    Hatter ER; King CJ; Shorey AE; Stilp CE
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2024 Apr; 86(3):962-975. PubMed ID: 36417128
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Modelling representations in speech normalization of prosodic cues.
    Si C; Zhang C; Lau P; Yang Y; Li B
    Sci Rep; 2022 Aug; 12(1):14635. PubMed ID: 36030274
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Talker Versus Dialect Effects on Speech Intelligibility: A Symmetrical Study.
    McCloy DR; Wright RA; Souza PE
    Lang Speech; 2015 Sep; 58(Pt 3):371-86. PubMed ID: 26529902
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Cueing listeners to attend to a target talker progressively improves word report as the duration of the cue-target interval lengthens to 2,000 ms.
    Holmes E; Kitterick PT; Summerfield AQ
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2018 Aug; 80(6):1520-1538. PubMed ID: 29696570
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Neural bases of talker normalization.
    Wong PC; Nusbaum HC; Small SL
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2004 Sep; 16(7):1173-84. PubMed ID: 15453972
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Functionally integrated neural processing of linguistic and talker information: An event-related fMRI and ERP study.
    Zhang C; Pugh KR; Mencl WE; Molfese PJ; Frost SJ; Magnuson JS; Peng G; Wang WS
    Neuroimage; 2016 Jan; 124(Pt A):536-549. PubMed ID: 26343322
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.