These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

161 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26950490)

  • 41. Elaborative retrieval: Do semantic mediators improve memory?
    Lehman M; Karpicke JD
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2016 Oct; 42(10):1573-1591. PubMed ID: 26974674
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Sleep can reduce the testing effect: it enhances recall of restudied items but can leave recall of retrieved items unaffected.
    Bäuml KH; Holterman C; Abel M
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2014 Nov; 40(6):1568-81. PubMed ID: 24933697
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Free recall test experience potentiates strategy-driven effects of value on memory.
    Cohen MS; Rissman J; Hovhannisyan M; Castel AD; Knowlton BJ
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2017 Oct; 43(10):1581-1601. PubMed ID: 28394160
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Levels of retrieval and the testing effect.
    Su N; Buchin ZL; Mulligan NW
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2021 Apr; 47(4):652-670. PubMed ID: 33983787
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. The two faces of selective memory retrieval: recall specificity of the detrimental but not the beneficial effect.
    Bäuml KH; Dobler IM
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2015 Jan; 41(1):246-53. PubMed ID: 24707790
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Memory updating after retrieval: when new information is false or correct.
    Carneiro P; Lapa A; Finn B
    Memory; 2021 Oct; 29(9):1156-1175. PubMed ID: 34412559
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Providing information about diagnostic features at retrieval reduces false recognition.
    Lane SM; Roussel CC; Starns JJ; Villa D; Alonzo JD
    Memory; 2008 Nov; 16(8):836-51. PubMed ID: 18785056
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Episodic context reinstatement promotes memory retention in older but not younger elementary schoolchildren.
    Ma X; Li T; Li Z; Zhou A
    Br J Dev Psychol; 2020 Jun; 38(2):304-318. PubMed ID: 31960469
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Decomposing Parietal Memory Reactivation to Predict Consequences of Remembering.
    Lee H; Samide R; Richter FR; Kuhl BA
    Cereb Cortex; 2019 Jul; 29(8):3305-3318. PubMed ID: 30137255
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. The testing effect under divided attention.
    Buchin ZL; Mulligan NW
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2017 Dec; 43(12):1934-1947. PubMed ID: 28504527
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Exploring the Impact of Mindfulness on False-Memory Susceptibility.
    Sherman SM; Grange JA
    Psychol Sci; 2020 Aug; 31(8):968-977. PubMed ID: 32663055
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Progressive retrieval practice leads to greater memory for image-word pairs than standard retrieval practice.
    Liu S; Zheng Z; Kent C; Briscoe J
    Memory; 2022 Aug; 30(7):796-805. PubMed ID: 35638593
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. "Identify-to-reject": a specific strategy to avoid false memories in the DRM paradigm.
    Carneiro P; Fernandez A; Diez E; Garcia-Marques L; Ramos T; Ferreira MB
    Mem Cognit; 2012 Feb; 40(2):252-65. PubMed ID: 21971606
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Mnemonic benefits of retrieval practice at short retention intervals.
    Rowland CA; DeLosh EL
    Memory; 2015; 23(3):403-19. PubMed ID: 24579674
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Transfer-appropriate processing in the testing effect.
    Veltre MT; Cho KW; Neely JH
    Memory; 2015; 23(8):1229-37. PubMed ID: 25345914
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Effect of encoding variability on rejection of non-corresponding lures: Role of retrieval processes.
    Rollins L; Parks N; Eakins R
    Conscious Cogn; 2023 Apr; 110():103506. PubMed ID: 36989862
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Reversing the testing effect by feedback is a matter of performance criterion at practice.
    Racsmány M; Szőllősi Á; Marián M
    Mem Cognit; 2020 Oct; 48(7):1161-1170. PubMed ID: 32418183
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Emotional modulation of episodic memory in school-age children and adults: Emotional items and their associated contextual details.
    Massol S; Vantaggio S; Chainay H
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 2020 Sep; 149(9):1684-1703. PubMed ID: 32039622
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Limits of the retrieval-inhibition construct: list segregation in directed forgetting.
    Wilson SP; Kipp K; Chapman K
    J Gen Psychol; 2003 Oct; 130(4):359-79. PubMed ID: 14672100
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Retrieval practice can insulate items against intralist interference: Evidence from the list-length effect, output interference, and retrieval-induced forgetting.
    Kliegl O; Bäuml KH
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2016 Feb; 42(2):202-14. PubMed ID: 26301963
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.