These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

167 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26950816)

  • 1. Effectiveness of Rotary Endodontic Instruments on Smear Layer Removal in Root Canals of Primary Teeth: A Scanning Electron Microscopy Study.
    Subramaniam P; Girish Babu KL; Tabrez TA
    J Clin Pediatr Dent; 2016; 40(2):141-6. PubMed ID: 26950816
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Appearance of the root canal walls after preparation with NiTi rotary instruments: a comparative SEM investigation.
    Prati C; Foschi F; Nucci C; Montebugnoli L; Marchionni S
    Clin Oral Investig; 2004 Jun; 8(2):102-10. PubMed ID: 14760541
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A scanning electron microscopic study of debris and smear layer remaining following use of AET instruments and K-flexofiles.
    Drukteinis S; Balciuniene I
    Stomatologija; 2006; 8(3):70-5. PubMed ID: 17191061
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Smear layer production by 3 rotary reamers with different cutting blade designs in straight root canals: a scanning electron microscopic study.
    Jeon IS; Spångberg LS; Yoon TC; Kazemi RB; Kum KY
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2003 Nov; 96(5):601-7. PubMed ID: 14600696
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. SEM evaluation of canal wall dentine following use of Mtwo and ProTaper NiTi rotary instruments.
    Foschi F; Nucci C; Montebugnoli L; Marchionni S; Breschi L; Malagnino VA; Prati C
    Int Endod J; 2004 Dec; 37(12):832-9. PubMed ID: 15548274
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The quality of apical canal preparation using hand and rotary instruments with specific criteria for enlargement based on initial apical file size.
    Tan BT; Messer HH
    J Endod; 2002 Sep; 28(9):658-64. PubMed ID: 12236311
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The effectiveness of manual and rotary techniques in the cleaning of root canals: a scanning electron microscopy study.
    Ahlquist M; Henningsson O; Hultenby K; Ohlin J
    Int Endod J; 2001 Oct; 34(7):533-7. PubMed ID: 11601771
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Smear layer production of K3 and ProFile Ni-Ti rotary instruments in curved root canals: a comparative SEM study.
    Kum KY; Kazemi RB; Cha BY; Zhu Q
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2006 Apr; 101(4):536-41. PubMed ID: 16545720
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A comparative scanning electron microscopic investigation of the efficacy of manual and automated instrumentation of root canals.
    Schäfer E; Zapke K
    J Endod; 2000 Nov; 26(11):660-4. PubMed ID: 11469296
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Evaluation of the Smear Layer Removal Ability of Various Rotary Files with/without Chemical Agents on Primary Teeth: An
    Abushanan A
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2024 Apr; 25(4):354-357. PubMed ID: 38956851
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Effectiveness of two nickel-titanium rotary instruments and a hand file for removing gutta-percha in severely curved root canals during retreatment: an ex vivo study.
    Gergi R; Sabbagh C
    Int Endod J; 2007 Jul; 40(7):532-7. PubMed ID: 17511787
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Ultrastructural morphologic evaluation of root canal walls prepared by two rotary nickel-titanium systems: a comparative study.
    Sabet NE; Lutfy RA
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2008 Sep; 106(3):e59-66. PubMed ID: 18602300
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Efficiency of rotary nickel-titanium K3 instruments compared with stainless steel hand K-Flexofile. Part 2. Cleaning effectiveness and shaping ability in severely curved root canals of extracted teeth.
    Schäfer E; Schlingemann R
    Int Endod J; 2003 Mar; 36(3):208-17. PubMed ID: 12657147
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Comparison of root canal preparation with two rotary NiTi instruments: ProFile .04 and GT Rotary.
    Rödig T; Hülsmann M; Kahlmeier C
    Int Endod J; 2007 Jul; 40(7):553-62. PubMed ID: 17511784
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Canal preparation with Hero 642 rotary Ni-Ti instruments compared with stainless steel hand K-file assessed using computed tomography.
    Taşdemir T; Aydemir H; Inan U; Unal O
    Int Endod J; 2005 Jun; 38(6):402-8. PubMed ID: 15910476
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. A comparative SEM investigation of the smear layer following preparation of root canals using nickel titanium rotary and hand instruments.
    Zand V; Bidar M; Ghaziani P; Rahimi S; Shahi S
    J Oral Sci; 2007 Mar; 49(1):47-52. PubMed ID: 17429182
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Comparative investigation of two rotary nickel-titanium instruments: ProTaper versus RaCe. Part 2. Cleaning effectiveness and shaping ability in severely curved root canals of extracted teeth.
    Schäfer E; Vlassis M
    Int Endod J; 2004 Apr; 37(4):239-48. PubMed ID: 15056350
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Impact of Er,Cr:YSGG laser therapy on the cleanliness of the root canal walls of primary teeth.
    Soares F; Varella CH; Pileggi R; Adewumi A; Guelmann M
    J Endod; 2008 Apr; 34(4):474-7. PubMed ID: 18358901
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. A comparative study of root canal preparation using Profile .04 and Lightspeed rotary Ni-Ti instruments.
    Versümer J; Hülsmann M; Schäfers F
    Int Endod J; 2002 Jan; 35(1):37-46. PubMed ID: 11853237
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A comparative study of root canal preparation with NiTi-TEE and K3 rotary Ni-Ti instruments.
    Jodway B; Hülsmann M
    Int Endod J; 2006 Jan; 39(1):71-80. PubMed ID: 16409331
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.