These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

195 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26951951)

  • 1. Immersed boundary-finite element model of fluid-structure interaction in the aortic root.
    Flamini V; DeAnda A; Griffith BE
    Theor Comput Fluid Dyn; 2016 Apr; 30(1):139-164. PubMed ID: 26951951
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Image-based immersed boundary model of the aortic root.
    Hasan A; Kolahdouz EM; Enquobahrie A; Caranasos TG; Vavalle JP; Griffith BE
    Med Eng Phys; 2017 Sep; 47():72-84. PubMed ID: 28778565
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Immersed boundary model of aortic heart valve dynamics with physiological driving and loading conditions.
    Griffith BE
    Int J Numer Method Biomed Eng; 2012 Mar; 28(3):317-45. PubMed ID: 25830200
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Fluid-structure interaction simulation of aortic valve closure with various sinotubular junction and sinus diameters.
    Pan Y; Qiao A; Dong N
    Ann Biomed Eng; 2015 Jun; 43(6):1363-9. PubMed ID: 25224079
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The Comparison of Different Constitutive Laws and Fiber Architectures for the Aortic Valve on Fluid-Structure Interaction Simulation.
    Cai L; Zhang R; Li Y; Zhu G; Ma X; Wang Y; Luo X; Gao H
    Front Physiol; 2021; 12():682893. PubMed ID: 34248670
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Fluid-structure interaction of a pulsatile flow with an aortic valve model: A combined experimental and numerical study.
    Sigüenza J; Pott D; Mendez S; Sonntag SJ; Kaufmann TAS; Steinseifer U; Nicoud F
    Int J Numer Method Biomed Eng; 2018 Apr; 34(4):e2945. PubMed ID: 29181891
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Fluid-structure interaction simulation of calcified aortic valve stenosis.
    Cai L; Hao Y; Ma P; Zhu G; Luo X; Gao H
    Math Biosci Eng; 2022 Sep; 19(12):13172-13192. PubMed ID: 36654041
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Quasi-static image-based immersed boundary-finite element model of left ventricle under diastolic loading.
    Gao H; Wang H; Berry C; Luo X; Griffith BE
    Int J Numer Method Biomed Eng; 2014 Nov; 30(11):1199-222. PubMed ID: 24799090
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. On the Lagrangian-Eulerian Coupling in the Immersed Finite Element/Difference Method.
    Lee JH; Griffith BE
    J Comput Phys; 2022 May; 457():. PubMed ID: 35300097
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A coupled fluid-structure finite element model of the aortic valve and root.
    Nicosia MA; Cochran RP; Einstein DR; Rutland CJ; Kunzelman KS
    J Heart Valve Dis; 2003 Nov; 12(6):781-9. PubMed ID: 14658821
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Some Effects of Different Constitutive Laws on FSI Simulation for the Mitral Valve.
    Cai L; Wang Y; Gao H; Ma X; Zhu G; Zhang R; Shen X; Luo X
    Sci Rep; 2019 Sep; 9(1):12753. PubMed ID: 31484963
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The sinus of Valsalva relieves abnormal stress on aortic valve leaflets by facilitating smooth closure.
    Katayama S; Umetani N; Sugiura S; Hisada T
    J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2008 Dec; 136(6):1528-35, 1535.e1. PubMed ID: 19114202
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Three-dimensional coupled fluid-structure simulation of pericardial bioprosthetic aortic valve function.
    Makhijani VB; Yang HQ; Dionne PJ; Thubrikar MJ
    ASAIO J; 1997; 43(5):M387-92. PubMed ID: 9360067
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Flow-Structure Interaction Simulations of the Aortic Heart Valve at Physiologic Conditions: The Role of Tissue Constitutive Model.
    Gilmanov A; Stolarski H; Sotiropoulos F
    J Biomech Eng; 2018 Apr; 140(4):. PubMed ID: 29305610
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Numerical model of the aortic root and valve: optimization of graft size and sinotubular junction to annulus ratio.
    Marom G; Halevi R; Haj-Ali R; Rosenfeld M; Schäfers HJ; Raanani E
    J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2013 Nov; 146(5):1227-31. PubMed ID: 23402688
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Dynamic finite element analysis of the aortic root from MRI-derived parameters.
    Conti CA; Votta E; Della Corte A; Del Viscovo L; Bancone C; Cotrufo M; Redaelli A
    Med Eng Phys; 2010 Mar; 32(2):212-21. PubMed ID: 20060766
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A design-based model of the aortic valve for fluid-structure interaction.
    Kaiser AD; Shad R; Hiesinger W; Marsden AL
    Biomech Model Mechanobiol; 2021 Dec; 20(6):2413-2435. PubMed ID: 34549354
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Effects of Normal Variation in the Rotational Position of the Aortic Root on Hemodynamics and Tissue Biomechanics of the Thoracic Aorta.
    Sundström E; Jonnagiri R; Gutmark-Little I; Gutmark E; Critser P; Taylor MD; Tretter JT
    Cardiovasc Eng Technol; 2020 Feb; 11(1):47-58. PubMed ID: 31701357
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. On the opening mechanism of the aortic valve: some observations from simulations.
    Howard IC; Patterson EA; Yoxall A
    J Med Eng Technol; 2003; 27(6):259-66. PubMed ID: 14602517
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Comparative finite element model analysis of ascending aortic flow in bicuspid and tricuspid aortic valve.
    Viscardi F; Vergara C; Antiga L; Merelli S; Veneziani A; Puppini G; Faggian G; Mazzucco A; Luciani GB
    Artif Organs; 2010 Dec; 34(12):1114-20. PubMed ID: 20618222
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.