125 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26952062)
1. Optimizing the Exposure Indicator as a Dose Management Strategy in Computed Radiography.
Seeram E; Davidson R; Bushong S; Swan H
Radiol Technol; 2016; 87(4):380-91. PubMed ID: 26952062
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. How Low Can We Go in Radiation Dose for the Data-Completion Scan on a Research Whole-Body Photon-Counting Computed Tomography System.
Yu Z; Leng S; Li Z; Halaweish AF; Kappler S; Ritman EL; McCollough CH
J Comput Assist Tomogr; 2016; 40(4):663-70. PubMed ID: 27096399
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Effects of AEC chamber selection on patient dose and image quality.
Hawking N; Elmore A
Radiol Technol; 2009; 80(5):411-9. PubMed ID: 19457845
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Low-dose computed tomography of the lumbar spine: a phantom study on imaging parameters and image quality.
Alshamari M; Geijer M; Norrman E; Geijer H
Acta Radiol; 2014 Sep; 55(7):824-32. PubMed ID: 24215904
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. White Paper of the Society of Computed Body Tomography and Magnetic Resonance on Dual-Energy CT, Part 2: Radiation Dose and Iodine Sensitivity.
Foley WD; Shuman WP; Siegel MJ; Sahani DV; Boll DT; Bolus DN; De Cecco CN; Kaza RK; Morgan DE; Schoepf UJ; Vrtiska TJ; Yeh BM; Berland LL
J Comput Assist Tomogr; 2016; 40(6):846-850. PubMed ID: 27768619
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. An assessment of exposure indices in computed radiography for the posterior-anterior chest and the lateral lumbar spine.
Warren-Forward H; Arthur L; Hobson L; Skinner R; Watts A; Clapham K; Lou D; Cook A
Br J Radiol; 2007 Jan; 80(949):26-31. PubMed ID: 16916804
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Are exposure index values consistent in clinical practice? A multi-manufacturer investigation.
Butler ML; Rainford L; Last J; Brennan PC
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2010; 139(1-3):371-4. PubMed ID: 20223849
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Radiation dose in pelvic imaging.
Brindhaban A; Al Khalifah K
Radiol Technol; 2005; 77(1):32-40. PubMed ID: 16218020
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. THE CONSISTENCY OF EXPOSURE INDICATOR VALUES IN DIGITAL RADIOGRAPHY SYSTEMS.
Jamil A; Mohd MI; Zain NM
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2018 Dec; 182(4):413-418. PubMed ID: 29767799
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Varied tube potential with constant effective dose at lumbar spine radiography using a flat-panel digital detector.
Geijer H; Persliden J
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2005; 114(1-3):240-5. PubMed ID: 15933115
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Dose estimations for Iranian 11-year-old pediatric phantoms undergoing computed tomography examinations.
Akhlaghi P; Miri-Hakimabad H; Rafat-Motavalli L
J Radiat Res; 2015 Jul; 56(4):646-55. PubMed ID: 25972393
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Impact of acquisition parameters on dose and image quality optimisation in paediatric pelvis radiography-A phantom study.
Mohammed Ali A; Hogg P; Abuzaid M; England A
Eur J Radiol; 2019 Sep; 118():130-137. PubMed ID: 31439232
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Variation of patient imaging doses with scanning parameters for linac-integrated kilovoltage cone beam CT.
Liao X; Wang Y; Lang J; Wang P; Li J; Ge R; Yang J
Biomed Mater Eng; 2015; 26 Suppl 1():S1659-67. PubMed ID: 26405932
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Effects of kilovoltage, milliampere seconds, and focal spot size on image quality.
Kei Ma W; Hogg P; Norton S
Radiol Technol; 2014; 85(5):479-85. PubMed ID: 24806050
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Construction and validation of a low cost paediatric pelvis phantom.
Mohammed Ali A; Hogg P; Johansen S; England A
Eur J Radiol; 2018 Nov; 108():84-91. PubMed ID: 30396676
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. High kilovoltage digital exposure techniques and patient dosimetry.
Fauber TL; Cohen TF; Dempsey MC
Radiol Technol; 2011; 82(6):501-10. PubMed ID: 21771934
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Exposure indicator degradation from CR plate processing delays.
Kowalczyk N; Comer E
Radiol Technol; 2009; 80(5):401-9. PubMed ID: 19457844
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Antero-posterior (AP) pelvis x-ray imaging on a trolley: Impact of trolley design, mattress design and radiographer practice on image quality and radiation dose.
Tugwell JR; England A; Hogg P
Radiography (Lond); 2017 Aug; 23(3):242-248. PubMed ID: 28687293
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Quality and dose optimization in hand computed radiography.
Pavan ALM; Alves AFF; Duarte SB; Giacomini G; Sardenberg T; Miranda JRA; Pina DR
Phys Med; 2015 Dec; 31(8):1065-1069. PubMed ID: 26148866
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Evaluation of variations in absorbed dose and image noise according to patient forms in X-ray computed tomography.
Matsubara K; Koshida K; Suzuki M; Hayakawa M; Tsujii H; Yamamoto T
Nihon Hoshasen Gijutsu Gakkai Zasshi; 2005 Dec; 61(12):1581-6. PubMed ID: 16395231
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
