These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

124 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26952062)

  • 41. Effect of comfort pads and incubator design on neonatal radiography.
    Jiang X; Baad M; Reiser I; Feinstein KA; Lu Z
    Pediatr Radiol; 2016 Jan; 46(1):112-8. PubMed ID: 26335424
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Optimal multidetector row CT parameters for evaluations of the breast: a phantom and specimen study.
    Yi A; Seo BK; Cho PK; Pisano ED; Lee KY; Je BK; Kim HY; Min BW; Son GS
    Acad Radiol; 2010 Jun; 17(6):744-51. PubMed ID: 20457417
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Analysis of CR dose reduction in pediatric patients, based on computer-simulated noise addition.
    Juste B; Villaescusa JI; Tortosa R; Miro R; Verdu G
    Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2008; 2008():2697-700. PubMed ID: 19163261
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Imaging doses from the Elekta Synergy X-ray cone beam CT system.
    Amer A; Marchant T; Sykes J; Czajka J; Moore C
    Br J Radiol; 2007 Jun; 80(954):476-82. PubMed ID: 17684077
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Ionization chamber volume determination and quality assurance using micro-CT imaging.
    McNiven AL; Umoh J; Kron T; Holdsworth DW; Battista JJ
    Phys Med Biol; 2008 Sep; 53(18):5029-43. PubMed ID: 18723930
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Radiation dose and image quality in diagnostic radiology. Optimization of the dose-image quality relationship with clinical experience from scoliosis radiography, coronary intervention and a flat-panel digital detector.
    Geijer H
    Acta Radiol Suppl; 2002 Mar; 43(427):1-43. PubMed ID: 12108231
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Association between subjective evaluation and physical parameters for radiographic images optimization.
    Alves AF; Alvarez M; Ribeiro SM; Duarte SB; Miranda JR; Pina DR
    Phys Med; 2016 Jan; 32(1):123-32. PubMed ID: 26573131
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Reducing Radiation Exposure Without Compromising Image Quality for Lumbar Spine CT.
    Chen B; DiRoberto C; Baccei SJ
    J Am Coll Radiol; 2016 Jul; 13(7):825-7. PubMed ID: 26810637
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Radiation Biology Irradiator Dose Verification Survey.
    Pedersen KH; Kunugi KA; Hammer CG; Culberson WS; DeWerd LA
    Radiat Res; 2016 Feb; 185(2):163-8. PubMed ID: 26771174
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Evaluation of strategies to reduce radiation dose in perfusion CT imaging using a reproducible biologic phantom.
    Ramirez-Giraldo JC; Thompson SM; Krishnamurthi G; Knudsen BE; Woodrum DA; Callstrom MR; McCollough CH
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2013 Jun; 200(6):W621-7. PubMed ID: 23701093
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Effective dose and image quality evaluations of an automatic CT tube current modulation system with an anthropomorphic phantom.
    Rampado O; Marchisio F; Izzo A; Garelli E; Bianchi CC; Gandini G; Ropolo R
    Eur J Radiol; 2009 Oct; 72(1):181-7. PubMed ID: 18692337
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. An airway phantom to standardize CT acquisition in multicenter clinical trials.
    Robinson TE; Long FR; Raman P; Saha P; Emond MJ; Reinhardt JM; Raman R; Brody AS
    Acad Radiol; 2009 Sep; 16(9):1134-41. PubMed ID: 19467609
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Comprehensive optimization process of paranasal sinus radiography.
    Saarakkala S; Nironen K; Hermunen H; Aarnio J; Heikkinen JO
    Acta Radiol; 2009 Apr; 50(3):327-33. PubMed ID: 19235578
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. CT Radiation: Key Concepts for Gentle and Wise Use.
    Kalra MK; Sodickson AD; Mayo-Smith WW
    Radiographics; 2015 Oct; 35(6):1706-21. PubMed ID: 26466180
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Dose reduction during CT fluoroscopy: phantom study of angular beam modulation.
    Hohl C; Suess C; Wildberger JE; Honnef D; Das M; Mühlenbruch G; Schaller A; Günther RW; Mahnken AH
    Radiology; 2008 Feb; 246(2):519-25. PubMed ID: 18227544
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Image quality, threshold contrast and mean glandular dose in CR mammography.
    Jakubiak RR; Gamba HR; Neves EB; Peixoto JE
    Phys Med Biol; 2013 Sep; 58(18):6565-83. PubMed ID: 24002695
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Phantoms for quality control procedures in digital breast tomosynthesis: dose assessment.
    Bouwman RW; Diaz O; van Engen RE; Young KC; den Heeten GJ; Broeders MJ; Veldkamp WJ; Dance DR
    Phys Med Biol; 2013 Jul; 58(13):4423-38. PubMed ID: 23756494
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. A comparative study of thoracic radiation doses from 64-slice cardiac CT.
    Nickoloff EL; Alderson PO
    Br J Radiol; 2007 Jul; 80(955):537-44. PubMed ID: 17704315
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. SYSTEM UPGRADE ON PHILIPS ALLURA FD20 ANGIOGRAPHY SYSTEMS: EFFECTS ON PATIENT SKIN DOSE AND STATIC IMAGE QUALITY.
    Ryckx N; Sans-Merce M; Meuli R; Zerlauth JB; Verdun FR
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2016 Jun; 169(1-4):313-8. PubMed ID: 26622042
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Reduction of radiation dose at HRCT of the temporal bone in children.
    Funama Y; Awai K; Shimamura M; Kakei K; Nagasue N; Yamashita Y
    Radiat Med; 2005 Dec; 23(8):578-83. PubMed ID: 16555569
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.