BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

331 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26952205)

  • 1. Difference in Postoperative Periprosthetic Bone Mineral Density Changes Between 3 Major Designs of Uncemented Stems: A 3-Year Follow-Up Study.
    Inaba Y; Kobayashi N; Oba M; Ike H; Kubota S; Saito T
    J Arthroplasty; 2016 Aug; 31(8):1836-41. PubMed ID: 26952205
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Unstable versus stable uncemented femoral stems: a radiological study of periprosthetic bone changes in two types of uncemented stems with different concepts of fixation.
    Bodén H; Adolphson P; Oberg M
    Arch Orthop Trauma Surg; 2004 Jul; 124(6):382-92. PubMed ID: 15112084
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Adaptive Bone Remodeling of the Femoral Bone After Tumor Resection Arthroplasty With an Uncemented Proximally Hydroxyapatite-Coated Stem.
    Andersen MR; Petersen MM
    J Clin Densitom; 2016; 19(2):202-7. PubMed ID: 25843447
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Periprosthetic bone remodelling of two types of uncemented femoral implant with proximal hydroxyapatite coating: a 3-year follow-up study addressing the influence of prosthesis design and preoperative bone density on periprosthetic bone loss.
    Rahmy AI; Gosens T; Blake GM; Tonino A; Fogelman I
    Osteoporos Int; 2004 Apr; 15(4):281-9. PubMed ID: 14661072
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Increased risk of periprosthetic femur fractures associated with a unique cementless stem design.
    Watts CD; Abdel MP; Lewallen DG; Berry DJ; Hanssen AD
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2015 Jun; 473(6):2045-53. PubMed ID: 25502478
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Clinical outcome and quantitative evaluation of periprosthetic bone-remodeling of an uncemented femoral component with taper design. A prospective study.
    Pitto RP; Schramm M; Hohmann D; Schmidt R
    Chir Organi Mov; 2001; 86(2):87-97. PubMed ID: 12025051
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. An evaluation of proximal femur bone density in young, active patients undergoing total hip arthroplasty at one year postoperatively.
    Nam D; Salih R; Barrack RL; Nunley RM
    Hip Int; 2019 Jan; 29(1):51-57. PubMed ID: 29726298
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Restoration of proximal periprosthetic bone loss by denosumab in cementless total hip arthroplasty.
    Nagoya S; Tateda K; Okazaki S; Kosukegawa I; Shimizu J; Yamashita T
    Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol; 2018 Dec; 28(8):1601-1607. PubMed ID: 29774416
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Periprosthetic Bone Mineral Density Around Uncemented Titanium Stems in the Second and Third Decade After Total Hip Arthroplasty: A DXA Study After 12, 17 and 21 Years.
    Peitgen DS; Innmann MM; Merle C; Gotterbarm T; Moradi B; Streit MR
    Calcif Tissue Int; 2018 Oct; 103(4):372-379. PubMed ID: 29858615
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Cumulative Long-Term Incidence of Postoperative Periprosthetic Femoral Fractures Using an Uncemented Tapered Titanium Hip Stem: 26- to 32-Year Results.
    Peitgen DS; Innmann MM; Merle C; Gotterbarm T; Moradi B; Streit MR
    J Arthroplasty; 2019 Jan; 34(1):77-81. PubMed ID: 30274947
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Lower periprosthetic bone loss and good fixation of an ultra-short stem compared to a conventional stem in uncemented total hip arthroplasty.
    Salemyr M; Muren O; Ahl T; Bodén H; Eisler T; Stark A; Sköldenberg O
    Acta Orthop; 2015; 86(6):659-66. PubMed ID: 26134386
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Evaluation of Proximal Femoral Bone Mineral Density in Cementless Total Hip Arthroplasty: A 3-Arm Prospective Randomized Controlled Trial.
    Hooper G; Thompson D; Frampton C; Lash N; Sharr J; Fulker D; Gilchrist N
    J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2024 Mar; 106(6):508-516. PubMed ID: 38113306
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Bone remodeling around stable uncemented titanium stems during the second decade after total hip arthroplasty: a DXA study at 12 and 17 years.
    Merle C; Streit MR; Volz C; Pritsch M; Gotterbarm T; Aldinger PR
    Osteoporos Int; 2011 Nov; 22(11):2879-86. PubMed ID: 21104230
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Evaluation of the Effects of the Metha® Short Stem on Periprosthetic Bone Remodelling in Total Hip Arthroplasties: Results at 48 Months.
    Parchi PD; Ciapini G; Castellini I; Mannucci C; Nucci AM; Piolanti N; Maffei S; Lisanti M
    Surg Technol Int; 2017 Jul; 30():346-351. PubMed ID: 28277592
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. [Bone Remodelling in the Proximal Femur after Uncemented Total Hip Arthroplasty in Patients with Osteoporosis].
    Lacko M; Schreierová D; Čellár R; Vaško G
    Acta Chir Orthop Traumatol Cech; 2015; 82(6):430-6. PubMed ID: 26787184
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Finite element analysis of cementless femoral stems based on mid- and long-term radiological evaluation.
    Matsuyama K; Ishidou Y; Guo YM; Kakoi H; Setoguchi T; Nagano S; Kawamura I; Maeda S; Komiya S
    BMC Musculoskelet Disord; 2016 Sep; 17(1):397. PubMed ID: 27642748
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Different loss of BMD using uncemented press-fit and whole polyethylene cups fixed with cement: repeated DXA studies in 96 hips randomized to 3 types of fixation.
    Digas G; Kärrholm J; Thanner J
    Acta Orthop; 2006 Apr; 77(2):218-26. PubMed ID: 16752282
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Tapered stems one-third proximally coated have higher complication rates than cylindrical two-third coated stems in patients with high hip dislocation undergoing total hip arthroplasty with step-cut shortening osteotomy.
    Ozden VE; Dikmen G; Beksac B; Tozun IR
    Orthop Traumatol Surg Res; 2017 Jun; 103(4):569-577. PubMed ID: 28300706
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Periprosthetic proximal bone loss after uncemented hip arthroplasty is related to stem size: DXA measurements in 138 patients followed for 2-7 years.
    Sköldenberg OG; Bodén HS; Salemyr MO; Ahl TE; Adolphson PY
    Acta Orthop; 2006 Jun; 77(3):386-92. PubMed ID: 16819676
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Comparison of mechanical stress and change in bone mineral density between two types of femoral implant using finite element analysis.
    Hirata Y; Inaba Y; Kobayashi N; Ike H; Fujimaki H; Saito T
    J Arthroplasty; 2013 Dec; 28(10):1731-5. PubMed ID: 23683518
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 17.