705 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26952352)
1. Multicenter analysis comparing robotic, open, laparoscopic, and vaginal hysterectomies performed by high-volume surgeons for benign indications.
Lim PC; Crane JT; English EJ; Farnam RW; Garza DM; Winter ML; Rozeboom JL
Int J Gynaecol Obstet; 2016 Jun; 133(3):359-64. PubMed ID: 26952352
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The impact of surgeon volume on perioperative adverse events in women undergoing minimally invasive hysterectomy for the large uterus.
Bretschneider CE; Frazzini Padilla P; Das D; Jelovsek JE; Unger CA
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2018 Nov; 219(5):490.e1-490.e8. PubMed ID: 30222939
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Comparison of robotic and other minimally invasive routes of hysterectomy for benign indications.
Swenson CW; Kamdar NS; Harris JA; Uppal S; Campbell DA; Morgan DM
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2016 Nov; 215(5):650.e1-650.e8. PubMed ID: 27343568
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Patient, surgeon, and hospital disparities associated with benign hysterectomy approach and perioperative complications.
Mehta A; Xu T; Hutfless S; Makary MA; Sinno AK; Tanner EJ; Stone RL; Wang K; Fader AN
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2017 May; 216(5):497.e1-497.e10. PubMed ID: 28034651
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The impact of robotics on the mode of benign hysterectomy and clinical outcomes.
Luciano AA; Luciano DE; Gabbert J; Seshadri-Kreaden U
Int J Med Robot; 2016 Mar; 12(1):114-24. PubMed ID: 25753111
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Minimally invasive hysterectomy for benign indications-surgical volume matters: a retrospective cohort study comparing complications of robotic-assisted and conventional laparoscopic hysterectomies.
Baracy MG; Martinez M; Hagglund K; Afzal F; Kulkarni S; Corey L; Aslam MF
J Robot Surg; 2022 Oct; 16(5):1199-1207. PubMed ID: 34981444
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Trends in readmission rate by route of hysterectomy - a single-center experience.
Kreuninger JA; Cohen SL; Meurs EAIM; Cox M; Vitonis A; Jansen FW; Einarsson JI
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2018 Mar; 97(3):285-293. PubMed ID: 29192965
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Laparoscopically assisted vaginal hysterectomy in a university hospital. Decreasing the need for abdominal hysterectomy and increasing resident experience in vaginal surgery.
Fylstra DL; Carter JF
J Reprod Med; 1996 Jul; 41(7):497-503. PubMed ID: 8829062
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Robotically assisted vs laparoscopic hysterectomy among women with benign gynecologic disease.
Wright JD; Ananth CV; Lewin SN; Burke WM; Lu YS; Neugut AI; Herzog TJ; Hershman DL
JAMA; 2013 Feb; 309(7):689-98. PubMed ID: 23423414
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Comparative analysis of vaginal versus robotic-assisted hysterectomy for benign indications.
Jacome EG; Hebert AE; Christian F
J Robot Surg; 2013 Mar; 7(1):39-46. PubMed ID: 27000891
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Comparison of Perioperative Complications by Route of Hysterectomy Performed for Benign Conditions.
Rahimi S; Jeppson PC; Gattoc L; Westermann L; Cichowski S; Raker C; Weber LeBrun E; Sung V
Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg; 2016; 22(5):364-8. PubMed ID: 27403755
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Laparoscopic and Robotic-Assisted Hysterectomy for Uterine Leiomyomas: A Comparison of Complications and Costs.
Ngan TYT; Zakhari A; Czuzoj-Shulman N; Tulandi T; Abenhaim HA
J Obstet Gynaecol Can; 2018 Apr; 40(4):432-439. PubMed ID: 29032064
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. A comparison of total laparoscopic hysterectomy to robotically assisted hysterectomy: surgical outcomes in a community practice.
Payne TN; Dauterive FR
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2008; 15(3):286-91. PubMed ID: 18439499
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Uterine weight and complications after abdominal, laparoscopic, and vaginal hysterectomy.
Louie M; Strassle PD; Moulder JK; Dizon AM; Schiff LD; Carey ET
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2018 Nov; 219(5):480.e1-480.e8. PubMed ID: 29959931
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. [Hysterectomy for benign lesions in the north of France: epidemiology and postoperative events].
Debodinance P
J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod (Paris); 2001 Apr; 30(2):151-9. PubMed ID: 11319467
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Rate of Urologic Injury with Robotic Hysterectomy.
Petersen SS; Doe S; Rubinfeld I; Davydova Y; Buekers T; Sangha R
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2018; 25(5):867-871. PubMed ID: 29337210
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Morbidity of 10 110 hysterectomies by type of approach.
Mäkinen J; Johansson J; Tomás C; Tomás E; Heinonen PK; Laatikainen T; Kauko M; Heikkinen AM; Sjöberg J
Hum Reprod; 2001 Jul; 16(7):1473-8. PubMed ID: 11425832
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. [A comparative analysis of hysterectomies].
Aniuliene R; Varzgaliene L; Varzgalis M
Medicina (Kaunas); 2007; 43(2):118-24. PubMed ID: 17329946
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The impact of surgeon volume on perioperative outcomes in hysterectomy.
Vree FE; Cohen SL; Chavan N; Einarsson JI
JSLS; 2014; 18(2):174-81. PubMed ID: 24960479
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Robotic hysterectomy versus conventional laparoscopic hysterectomy: outcome and cost analyses of a matched case-control study.
Sarlos D; Kots L; Stevanovic N; Schaer G
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2010 May; 150(1):92-6. PubMed ID: 20207063
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
