702 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26952352)
21. Effect of Minimum-Volume Standards on Patient Outcomes and Surgical Practice Patterns for Hysterectomy.
Ruiz MP; Chen L; Hou JY; Tergas AI; St Clair CM; Ananth CV; Neugut AI; Hershman DL; Wright JD
Obstet Gynecol; 2018 Nov; 132(5):1229-1237. PubMed ID: 30303921
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Longer Operative Time During Benign Laparoscopic and Robotic Hysterectomy Is Associated With Increased 30-Day Perioperative Complications.
Catanzarite T; Saha S; Pilecki MA; Kim JY; Milad MP
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2015; 22(6):1049-58. PubMed ID: 26070725
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Impact of robotic technology on hysterectomy route and associated implications for resident education.
Jeppson PC; Rahimi S; Gattoc L; Westermann LB; Cichowski S; Raker C; LeBrun EEW; Sung VW;
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2015 Feb; 212(2):196.e1-6. PubMed ID: 25068556
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. In-hospital complications of vaginal versus laparoscopic-assisted benign hysterectomy among older women: a propensity score-matched cohort study.
Lai JC; Chen HH; Huang SM; Wang KL; Huang N; Hu HY; Chou YJ
Menopause; 2016 Nov; 23(11):1233-1238. PubMed ID: 27465711
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Comparison of laparoscopy-assisted hysterectomies with conventional hysterectomies.
Abdollahi SF; Bahlouli A; Mostafa PG; Rasooli S; Morteza G
Saudi Med J; 2009 Jun; 30(6):813-6. PubMed ID: 19526166
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. An analysis of the impact of previous laparoscopic hysterectomy experience on the learning curve for robotic hysterectomy.
Eddib A; Jain N; Aalto M; Hughes S; Eswar A; Erk M; Michalik C; Krovi V; Singhal P
J Robot Surg; 2013 Sep; 7(3):295-9. PubMed ID: 27000926
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Use of bowel preparation does not reduce postoperative infectious morbidity following minimally invasive or open hysterectomies.
Kalogera E; Van Houten HK; Sangaralingham LR; Borah BJ; Dowdy SC
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2020 Aug; 223(2):231.e1-231.e12. PubMed ID: 32112733
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Histologic artifacts in abdominal, vaginal, laparoscopic, and robotic hysterectomy specimens: a blinded, retrospective review.
Krizova A; Clarke BA; Bernardini MQ; James S; Kalloger SE; Boerner SL; Mulligan AM
Am J Surg Pathol; 2011 Jan; 35(1):115-26. PubMed ID: 21164295
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Impact of power morcellator removal on hysterectomy practice patterns.
Wesol A; Woolley S
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2017 Aug; 215():41-44. PubMed ID: 28599164
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Cost comparison of robotic-assisted laparoscopic hysterectomy versus standard laparoscopic hysterectomy.
Winter ML; Leu SY; Lagrew DC; Bustillo G
J Robot Surg; 2015 Dec; 9(4):269-75. PubMed ID: 26530837
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Effect of robotic surgery on hysterectomy trends: implications for resident education.
Yamasato K; Casey D; Kaneshiro B; Hiraoka M
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2014; 21(3):399-405. PubMed ID: 24172026
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. An audit on hysterectomy for benign diseases in public hospitals in Hong Kong.
Leung PL; Tsang SW; Yuen PM;
Hong Kong Med J; 2007 Jun; 13(3):187-93. PubMed ID: 17548906
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. [Hysterectomies for benign pathology: is there a place for laparoscopic surgery?].
Anquetil C; Capella-Alouc S; Fernandez H
Contracept Fertil Sex; 1999 Apr; 27(4):291-7. PubMed ID: 10349772
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Incidence and Prevention of Vaginal Cuff Dehiscence after Laparoscopic and Robotic Hysterectomy: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.
Uccella S; Zorzato PC; Kho RM
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2021 Mar; 28(3):710-720. PubMed ID: 33348012
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. A Comparison of Outcomes Between Robotic-Assisted, Single-Site Laparoscopy Versus Laparoendoscopic Single Site for Benign Hysterectomy.
Lopez S; Mulla ZD; Hernandez L; Garza DM; Payne TN; Farnam RW
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2016 Jan; 23(1):84-8. PubMed ID: 26321172
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Progressive reduction in abdominal hysterectomy rates: impact of laparoscopy, robotics and surgeon factors.
Moen M; Noone M; Cholkeri-Singh A; Vassallo B; Locker B; Miller C
J Robot Surg; 2014 Mar; 8(1):13-7. PubMed ID: 27637233
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Cost-analysis of robotic-assisted laparoscopic hysterectomy versus total abdominal hysterectomy for women with endometrial cancer and atypical complex hyperplasia.
Herling SF; Palle C; Møller AM; Thomsen T; Sørensen J
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2016 Mar; 95(3):299-308. PubMed ID: 26575851
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Advanced Training of Gynecologic Surgeons and Incidence of Intraoperative Complications after Total Laparoscopic Hysterectomy: A Retrospective Study of More Than 2000 Cases at a Single Institution.
McDonnell RM; Hollingworth JL; Chivers P; Cohen PA; Salfinger SG
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2018; 25(5):810-815. PubMed ID: 29253636
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Vaginal cuff dehiscence in robotic-assisted total hysterectomy.
Kashani S; Gallo T; Sargent A; Elsahwi K; Silasi DA; Azodi M
JSLS; 2012; 16(4):530-6. PubMed ID: 23484559
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Costs and outcomes of abdominal, vaginal, laparoscopic and robotic hysterectomies.
Wright KN; Jonsdottir GM; Jorgensen S; Shah N; Einarsson JI
JSLS; 2012; 16(4):519-24. PubMed ID: 23484557
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
