These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
157 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26952353)
1. Prediction of vaginal birth after cesarean delivery. Bhide A; Caric V; Arulkumaran S Int J Gynaecol Obstet; 2016 Jun; 133(3):297-300. PubMed ID: 26952353 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Prediction of successful trial of labor after cesarean - the benefit of prior vaginal delivery. Ashwal E; Wertheimer A; Aviram A; Wiznitzer A; Yogev Y; Hiersch L J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med; 2016; 29(16):2665-70. PubMed ID: 26399162 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Are prediction models for vaginal birth after cesarean accurate? Harris BS; Heine RP; Park J; Faurot KR; Hopkins MK; Rivara AJ; Kemeny HR; Grotegut CA; Jelovsek JE Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2019 May; 220(5):492.e1-492.e7. PubMed ID: 30716285 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Predicting the chance of vaginal delivery after one cesarean section: validation and elaboration of a published prediction model. Fagerberg MC; Maršál K; Källén K Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2015 May; 188():88-94. PubMed ID: 25801723 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Validation of a vaginal birth after cesarean delivery prediction model in women with two prior cesarean deliveries. Metz TD; Allshouse AA; Faucett AM; Grobman WA Obstet Gynecol; 2015 Apr; 125(4):948-952. PubMed ID: 25751218 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Validation of the prediction model for success of vaginal birth after cesarean delivery. Costantine MM; Fox K; Byers BD; Mateus J; Ghulmiyyah LM; Blackwell S; Hankins GDV; Grobman WA; Saade G Obstet Gynecol; 2009 Nov; 114(5):1029-1033. PubMed ID: 20168103 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. French validation and adaptation of the Grobman nomogram for prediction of vaginal birth after cesarean delivery. Haumonte JB; Raylet M; Christophe M; Mauviel F; Bertrand A; Desbriere R; d'Ercole C J Gynecol Obstet Hum Reprod; 2018 Mar; 47(3):127-131. PubMed ID: 29229362 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. A prediction model of vaginal birth after cesarean in the preterm period. Mardy AH; Ananth CV; Grobman WA; Gyamfi-Bannerman C Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2016 Oct; 215(4):513.e1-7. PubMed ID: 27262971 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Does midtrimester cervical length aid in predicting vaginal birth after cesarean? Miller ES; Sakowicz A; Donelan EA; Grobman WA Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2015 Jun; 212(6):791.e1-4. PubMed ID: 25726519 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Validation of the close-to-delivery prediction model for vaginal birth after cesarean delivery in a Middle Eastern cohort. Abdel Aziz A; Abd Rabbo A; Sayed Ahmed WA; Khamees RE; Atwa KA Int J Gynaecol Obstet; 2016 Jul; 134(1):75-8. PubMed ID: 27118509 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. External validation of vaginal birth after cesarean delivery calculator in Israeli cohort of parturients and construction of an improved model. Haggiag N; Eitan S; Maor-Sagie E; Hallak M; Gabbay-Benziv R Int J Gynaecol Obstet; 2023 Apr; 161(1):182-189. PubMed ID: 36066199 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Validation of a prediction model for vaginal birth after caesarean. Chaillet N; Bujold E; Dubé E; Grobman WA J Obstet Gynaecol Can; 2013 Feb; 35(2):119-124. PubMed ID: 23470060 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Validation of prediction model for successful vaginal birth after Cesarean delivery based on sonographic assessment of hysterotomy scar. Baranov A; Salvesen KÅ; Vikhareva O Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2018 Feb; 51(2):189-193. PubMed ID: 28233347 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The MFMU Cesarean Registry: factors affecting the success of trial of labor after previous cesarean delivery. Landon MB; Leindecker S; Spong CY; Hauth JC; Bloom S; Varner MW; Moawad AH; Caritis SN; Harper M; Wapner RJ; Sorokin Y; Miodovnik M; Carpenter M; Peaceman AM; O'Sullivan MJ; Sibai BM; Langer O; Thorp JM; Ramin SM; Mercer BM; Gabbe SG; Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2005 Sep; 193(3 Pt 2):1016-23. PubMed ID: 16157104 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Validation of the prediction model for success of vaginal birth after cesarean delivery in Japanese women. Yokoi A; Ishikawa K; Miyazaki K; Yoshida K; Furuhashi M; Tamakoshi K Int J Med Sci; 2012; 9(6):488-91. PubMed ID: 22927774 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Mid-trimester cervical length and prediction of vaginal birth after cesarean delivery in Chinese parturients: A retrospective study. Liu G; Zhou C; Wang S; Zhang H J Gynecol Obstet Hum Reprod; 2023 Nov; 52(9):102647. PubMed ID: 37611746 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Vaginal birth after Cesarean delivery: predicting success, risks of failure. Durnwald C; Mercer B J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med; 2004 Jun; 15(6):388-93. PubMed ID: 15280110 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Does the interval since vaginal delivery influence the chance of vaginal birth after cesarean? Miller ES; Grobman WA J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med; 2016; 29(2):294-7. PubMed ID: 25586319 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Third-trimester prediction of successful vaginal birth after one cesarean delivery-A Swedish model. Carlsson Fagerberg M; Källén K Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2020 May; 99(5):660-668. PubMed ID: 31788783 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Establishment and validation of a prediction model for vaginal delivery after cesarean and its pregnancy outcomes-Based on a prospective study. Lin J; Hou Y; Ke Y; Zeng W; Gu W Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2019 Nov; 242():114-121. PubMed ID: 31580963 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]