These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

84 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2695335)

  • 1. Morphometric versus densitometric assessment of coronary vasomotor tone--an overview.
    Doriot PA; Guggenheim N; Dorsaz PA; Rutishauser W
    Eur Heart J; 1989 Nov; 10 Suppl F():49-53. PubMed ID: 2695335
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Morphometry versus densitometry--a comparison by use of casts of human coronary arteries.
    Doriot PA; Suilen C; Guggenheim N; Dorsaz PA; Chappuis F; Rutishauser W
    Int J Card Imaging; 1992; 8(2):121-30. PubMed ID: 1629638
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The impact of vessel orientation in space on densitometric measurements of cross sectional areas of coronary arteries.
    Doriot PA; Dorsaz PA; Dorsaz L; Chatelain P; Rutishauser W
    Int J Card Imaging; 1996 Dec; 12(4):289-97. PubMed ID: 8993991
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Quantification of coronary artery lumen volume by digital angiography: in vivo validation.
    Molloi S; Kassab GS; Zhou Y
    Circulation; 2001 Nov; 104(19):2351-7. PubMed ID: 11696477
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Adaptive approach to accurate analysis of small-diameter vessels in cineangiograms.
    Sonka M; Reddy GK; Winniford MD; Collins SM
    IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 1997 Feb; 16(1):87-95. PubMed ID: 9050411
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A new technique for improved densitometric quantification of coronary artery stenoses in angiographic images.
    Dorsaz PA; Doriot PA; Dorsaz L; Rutishauser W
    Physiol Meas; 1997 Nov; 18(4):277-88. PubMed ID: 9413862
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Arteriographic evaluation of small coronary arteries.
    Bruschke AV; Padmos I; Buis B; Van Benthem A
    J Am Coll Cardiol; 1990 Mar; 15(4):784-9. PubMed ID: 2307787
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Suitability of the Cordis Stabilizer marker guide wire for quantitative coronary angiography calibration: an in vitro and in vivo study.
    Koning G; Hekking E; Kemppainen JS; Richardson GA; Rothman MT; Reiber JH
    Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2001 Mar; 52(3):334-41. PubMed ID: 11246248
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. In-vivo validation of videodensitometric coronary cross-sectional area measurement using dual-energy digital subtraction angiography.
    Molloi S; Ersahin A; Hicks J; Wallis J
    Int J Card Imaging; 1995 Dec; 11(4):223-31. PubMed ID: 8596060
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Blood flow determinations utilizing digital densitometry.
    Lois JF; Mankovich NJ; Gomes AS
    Acta Radiol; 1987; 28(5):635-41. PubMed ID: 2960362
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Improved determination of biplane imaging geometry from two projection images and its application to three-dimensional reconstruction of coronary arterial trees.
    Chen SY; Metz CE
    Med Phys; 1997 May; 24(5):633-54. PubMed ID: 9167155
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. [Effect of sharpening filter on vessel diameter measured by quantitative coronary arteriography].
    Arai H; Hosonuma N; Gou M; Ueno T
    Nihon Hoshasen Gijutsu Gakkai Zasshi; 2002 May; 58(5):694-9. PubMed ID: 12520240
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Validation of a new automatic system for biplane quantitative coronary arteriography.
    Büchi M; Hess OM; Kirkeeide RL; Suter T; Muser M; Osenberg HP; Niederer P; Anliker M; Gould KL; Krayenbühl HP
    Int J Card Imaging; 1990; 5(2-3):93-103. PubMed ID: 2230301
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Accurate geometric calibration in stepping-table digital subtraction angiography.
    Schmidt MA; Nayak SL; Belli AM; Britten AJ
    Br J Radiol; 2007 Oct; 80(958):835-40. PubMed ID: 17875596
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Accurate quantification of vessel cross-sectional area using CT angiography: a simulation study.
    Molloi S; Johnson T; Ding H; Lipinski J
    Int J Cardiovasc Imaging; 2017 Mar; 33(3):411-419. PubMed ID: 27838897
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Assessment of image intensifier and distortion for DSA localization studies.
    Coste E; Gibon D; Rousseau J
    Br J Radiol; 1997 Jan; 70():70-3. PubMed ID: 9059298
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Validation of image-based method for extraction of coronary morphometry.
    Wischgoll T; Choy JS; Ritman EL; Kassab GS
    Ann Biomed Eng; 2008 Mar; 36(3):356-68. PubMed ID: 18228141
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A system for determination of 3D vessel tree centerlines from biplane images.
    Hoffmann KR; Sen A; Lan L; Chua KG; Esthappan J; Mazzucco M
    Int J Card Imaging; 2000 Oct; 16(5):315-30. PubMed ID: 11215917
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Pulsatile coronary flow determination by digital angiography.
    Marinus H; Buis B; van Benthem A
    Int J Card Imaging; 1990; 5(2-3):173-82. PubMed ID: 2230295
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Quantitative coronary angiography using image recovery techniques for background estimation in unsubtracted images.
    Wong JT; Kamyar F; Molloi S
    Med Phys; 2007 Oct; 34(10):4003-15. PubMed ID: 17985646
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.