These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

164 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26953570)

  • 1. Implied Spatial Meaning and Visuospatial Bias: Conceptual Processing Influences Processing of Visual Targets and Distractors.
    Gozli DG; Pratt J; Martin KZ; Chasteen AL
    PLoS One; 2016; 11(3):e0150928. PubMed ID: 26953570
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Spatial probability as an attentional cue in visual search.
    Geng JJ; Behrmann M
    Percept Psychophys; 2005 Oct; 67(7):1252-68. PubMed ID: 16502846
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The cost and benefit of implicit spatial cues for visual attention.
    Gozli DG; Chasteen AL; Pratt J
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 2013 Nov; 142(4):1028-46. PubMed ID: 23106305
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Altering spatial priority maps via statistical learning of target selection and distractor filtering.
    Ferrante O; Patacca A; Di Caro V; Della Libera C; Santandrea E; Chelazzi L
    Cortex; 2018 May; 102():67-95. PubMed ID: 29096874
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Modulations of saliency signals at two hierarchical levels of priority computation revealed by spatial statistical distractor learning.
    Liesefeld HR; Müller HJ
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 2021 Apr; 150(4):710-728. PubMed ID: 33048567
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Attention goes both ways: Shifting attention influences lexical decisions.
    Mills M; Boychuk P; Chasteen AL; Pratt J
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 2018 Feb; 147(2):282-291. PubMed ID: 29369682
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Asymmetries in the covert orienting of visual spatial attention to spatial and non-spatial cues in Alzheimer's disease.
    Maruff P; Malone V; Currie J
    Brain; 1995 Dec; 118 ( Pt 6)():1421-35. PubMed ID: 8595474
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Top-down influences mediate hand bias in spatial attention.
    Garza JP; Strom MJ; Wright CE; Roberts RJ; Reed CL
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2013 Jul; 75(5):819-23. PubMed ID: 23722884
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Bow Your Head in Shame, or, Hold Your Head Up with Pride: Semantic Processing of Self-Esteem Concepts Orients Attention Vertically.
    Taylor JE; Lam TK; Chasteen AL; Pratt J
    PLoS One; 2015; 10(9):e0137704. PubMed ID: 26368276
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. What is learned in spatial contextual cuing--configuration or individual locations?
    Jiang Y; Wagner LC
    Percept Psychophys; 2004 Apr; 66(3):454-63. PubMed ID: 15283070
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Probability cueing of singleton-distractor locations in visual search: Priority-map- versus dimension-based inhibition?
    Zhang B; Allenmark F; Liesefeld HR; Shi Z; Müller HJ
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2019 Sep; 45(9):1146-1163. PubMed ID: 31144860
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The influence of traumatic brain injury on the allocation of vertical spatial attention.
    Hromas G; Polejaeva E; Sozda CN; Heilman KM; Schmalfuss IM; Perlstein WM
    J Clin Exp Neuropsychol; 2020 Feb; 42(1):101-110. PubMed ID: 31665971
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Processing of visual signals for direct specification of motor targets and for conceptual representation of action targets in the dorsal and ventral premotor cortex.
    Yamagata T; Nakayama Y; Tanji J; Hoshi E
    J Neurophysiol; 2009 Dec; 102(6):3280-94. PubMed ID: 19793880
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Visuospatial Asymmetries Arise from Differences in the Onset Time of Perceptual Evidence Accumulation.
    Newman DP; Loughnane GM; Kelly SP; O'Connell RG; Bellgrove MA
    J Neurosci; 2017 Mar; 37(12):3378-3385. PubMed ID: 28242798
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. History Modulates Early Sensory Processing of Salient Distractors.
    Adam KCS; Serences JT
    J Neurosci; 2021 Sep; 41(38):8007-8022. PubMed ID: 34330776
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Filtering performance in visual working memory is improved by reducing early spatial attention to the distractors.
    Allon AS; Luria R
    Psychophysiology; 2019 May; 56(5):e13323. PubMed ID: 30609072
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.
    Crider K; Williams J; Qi YP; Gutman J; Yeung L; Mai C; Finkelstain J; Mehta S; Pons-Duran C; Menéndez C; Moraleda C; Rogers L; Daniels K; Green P
    Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2022 Feb; 2(2022):. PubMed ID: 36321557
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Obama cares about visuo-spatial attention: perception of political figures moves attention and determines gaze direction.
    Mills M; Smith KB; Hibbing JR; Dodd MD
    Behav Brain Res; 2015 Feb; 278():221-5. PubMed ID: 25300469
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Attentional weighting: a possible account of visual field asymmetries in visual search?
    Rezec AA; Dobkins KR
    Spat Vis; 2004; 17(4-5):269-93. PubMed ID: 15559106
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Rebalancing Spatial Attention: Endogenous Orienting May Partially Overcome the Left Visual Field Bias in Rapid Serial Visual Presentation.
    Śmigasiewicz K; Hasan GS; Verleger R
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2017 Jan; 29(1):1-13. PubMed ID: 27626225
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.