These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
337 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26954013)
1. Comparison of Airway Management Methods in Entrapped Patients: A Manikin Study. Martin AB; Lingg J; Lubin JS Prehosp Emerg Care; 2016; 20(5):657-61. PubMed ID: 26954013 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Airway Management in Disaster Response: A Manikin Study Comparing Direct and Video Laryngoscopy for Endotracheal Intubation by Prehospital Providers in Level C Personal Protective Equipment. Yousif S; Machan JT; Alaska Y; Suner S Prehosp Disaster Med; 2017 Aug; 32(4):352-356. PubMed ID: 28318455 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Comparison of success rates between two video laryngoscope systems used in a prehospital clinical trial. Burnett AM; Frascone RJ; Wewerka SS; Kealey SE; Evens ZN; Griffith KR; Salzman JG Prehosp Emerg Care; 2014; 18(2):231-8. PubMed ID: 24400965 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. A Comparison of Paramedic First Pass Endotracheal Intubation Success Rate of the VividTrac VT-A 100, GlideScope Ranger, and Direct Laryngoscopy Under Simulated Prehospital Cervical Spinal Immobilization Conditions in a Cadaveric Model. Hodnick R; Zitek T; Galster K; Johnson S; Bledsoe B; Ebbs D Prehosp Disaster Med; 2017 Dec; 32(6):621-624. PubMed ID: 28807073 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Difficult airway management for novice physicians: a randomized trial comparing direct and video-assisted laryngoscopy. Ambrosio A; Pfannenstiel T; Bach K; Cornelissen C; Gaconnet C; Brigger MT Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 2014 May; 150(5):775-8. PubMed ID: 24477825 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Direct versus video laryngoscopic intubation by novice prehospital intubators with and without chest compressions: A pilot manikin study. Kim YM; Kang HG; Kim JH; Chung HS; Yim HW; Jeong SH Prehosp Emerg Care; 2011; 15(1):98-103. PubMed ID: 21034232 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. A comparison of the King-LT to endotracheal intubation and Combitube in a simulated difficult airway. Russi CS; Miller L; Hartley MJ Prehosp Emerg Care; 2008; 12(1):35-41. PubMed ID: 18189175 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Comparison of the king vision video laryngoscope with the macintosh laryngoscope. Murphy LD; Kovacs GJ; Reardon PM; Law JA J Emerg Med; 2014 Aug; 47(2):239-46. PubMed ID: 24742495 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Prehospital pediatric King LT-D use: a pilot study. Ritter SC; Guyette FX Prehosp Emerg Care; 2011; 15(3):401-4. PubMed ID: 21480773 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Evaluation of the Storz CMAC®, Glidescope® GVL, AirTraq®, King LTS-D™, and direct laryngoscopy in a simulated difficult airway. Nelson JG; Wewerka SS; Woster CM; Burnett AM; Salzman JG; Frascone RJ Am J Emerg Med; 2013 Mar; 31(3):589-92. PubMed ID: 23347722 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Endotracheal Intubation with the King Laryngeal Tube™ In Situ Using Video Laryngoscopy and a Bougie: A Retrospective Case Series and Cadaveric Crossover Study. Dodd KW; Kornas RL; Prekker ME; Klein LR; Reardon RF; Driver BE J Emerg Med; 2017 Apr; 52(4):403-408. PubMed ID: 27876327 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Supraglottic airway device use as a primary airway during rapid sequence intubation. Frascone RJ; Wewerka SS; Burnett AM; Griffith KR; Salzman JG Air Med J; 2013; 32(2):93-7. PubMed ID: 23452368 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Comparison of video, optical, and direct laryngoscopy by experienced tactical paramedics. Yun BJ; Brown CA; Grazioso CJ; Pozner CN; Raja AS Prehosp Emerg Care; 2014; 18(3):442-5. PubMed ID: 24460509 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Airway management during ongoing chest compressions-direct vs. video laryngoscopy. A randomised manikin study. Steffen R; Hischier S; Roten FM; Huber M; Knapp J PLoS One; 2023; 18(2):e0281186. PubMed ID: 36757942 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. [Comparison of five video laryngoscopes and conventional direct laryngoscopy : Investigations on simple and simulated difficult airways on the intubation trainer]. Ruetzler K; Imach S; Weiss M; Haas T; Schmidt AR Anaesthesist; 2015 Jul; 64(7):513-9. PubMed ID: 26174747 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. A comparison of McGrath MAC® and standard direct laryngoscopy in simulated immobilized cervical spine pediatric intubation: a manikin study. Madziala M; Smereka J; Dabrowski M; Leung S; Ruetzler K; Szarpak L Eur J Pediatr; 2017 Jun; 176(6):779-786. PubMed ID: 28429117 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Emergency airway placement by EMS providers: comparison between the King LT supralaryngeal airway and endotracheal intubation. Burns JB; Branson R; Barnes SL; Tsuei BJ Prehosp Disaster Med; 2010; 25(1):92-5. PubMed ID: 20405470 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Impact of System-Wide King LT Airway Implementation on Orotracheal Intubation. Hilton MT; Wayne M; Martin-Gill C Prehosp Emerg Care; 2016; 20(5):570-7. PubMed ID: 27058646 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. EMS Intubation Improves with King Vision Video Laryngoscopy. Jarvis JL; McClure SF; Johns D Prehosp Emerg Care; 2015; 19(4):482-9. PubMed ID: 25909850 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Inverse intubation in entrapped trauma casualties: a simulator based, randomised cross-over comparison of direct, indirect and video laryngoscopy. Schober P; Krage R; van Groeningen D; Loer SA; Schwarte LA Emerg Med J; 2014 Dec; 31(12):959-63. PubMed ID: 24005641 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]