These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

122 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26954222)

  • 1. Optimization of Swine Breeding Programs Using Genomic Selection with ZPLAN.
    Lopez BM; Kang HS; Kim TH; Viterbo VS; Kim HS; Na CS; Seo KS
    Asian-Australas J Anim Sci; 2016 May; 29(5):640-5. PubMed ID: 26954222
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Utility of the Guy's stone score based on computed tomographic scan findings for predicting percutaneous nephrolithotomy outcomes.
    Vicentini FC; Marchini GS; Mazzucchi E; Claro JF; Srougi M
    Urology; 2014 Jun; 83(6):1248-53. PubMed ID: 24612615
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Economic evaluation of genomic breeding programs.
    König S; Simianer H; Willam A
    J Dairy Sci; 2009 Jan; 92(1):382-91. PubMed ID: 19109296
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Genomic selection strategies in a small dairy cattle population evaluated for genetic gain and profit.
    Thomasen JR; Egger-Danner C; Willam A; Guldbrandtsen B; Lund MS; Sørensen AC
    J Dairy Sci; 2014; 97(1):458-70. PubMed ID: 24239076
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Efficiency of genomic selection in an established commercial layer breeding program.
    Sitzenstock F; Ytournel F; Sharifi AR; Cavero D; Täubert H; Preisinger R; Simianer H
    Genet Sel Evol; 2013 Jul; 45(1):29. PubMed ID: 23902427
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Economic evaluation of genomic selection in small ruminants: a sheep meat breeding program.
    Shumbusho F; Raoul J; Astruc JM; Palhiere I; Lemarié S; Fugeray-Scarbel A; Elsen JM
    Animal; 2016 Jun; 10(6):1033-41. PubMed ID: 26446712
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Community-based breeding programs can realize sustainable genetic gain and economic benefits in tropical dairy cattle systems.
    Hunde D; Tadesse Y; Tadesse M; Abegaz S; Getachew T
    Front Genet; 2024; 15():1106709. PubMed ID: 38818034
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Efficiency of different selection strategies against boar taint in pigs.
    Haberland AM; Luther H; Hofer A; Tholen E; Simianer H; Lind B; Baes C
    Animal; 2014 Jan; 8(1):11-9. PubMed ID: 24176119
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A comparison of dairy cattle breeding designs that use genomic selection.
    Lillehammer M; Meuwissen TH; Sonesson AK
    J Dairy Sci; 2011 Jan; 94(1):493-500. PubMed ID: 21183061
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Deterministic models of breeding scheme designs that incorporate genomic selection.
    Pryce JE; Goddard ME; Raadsma HW; Hayes BJ
    J Dairy Sci; 2010 Nov; 93(11):5455-66. PubMed ID: 20965361
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Optimum multistage genomic selection in dairy cattle.
    Börner V; Teuscher F; Reinsch N
    J Dairy Sci; 2012 Apr; 95(4):2097-107. PubMed ID: 22459855
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Application of selection index calculations to determine selection strategies in genomic breeding programs.
    König S; Swalve HH
    J Dairy Sci; 2009 Oct; 92(10):5292-303. PubMed ID: 19762847
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Metabolome Profiling of Heat Priming Effects, Senescence, and Acclimation of Bread Wheat Induced by High Temperatures at Different Growth Stages.
    Matsunaga S; Yamasaki Y; Mega R; Toda Y; Akashi K; Tsujimoto H
    Int J Mol Sci; 2021 Dec; 22(23):. PubMed ID: 34884945
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Genomic selection in a pig population including information from slaughtered full sibs of boars within a sib-testing program.
    Samorè AB; Buttazzoni L; Gallo M; Russo V; Fontanesi L
    Animal; 2015 May; 9(5):750-9. PubMed ID: 25510405
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Genomic selection strategies in dairy cattle: Strong positive interaction between use of genotypic information and intensive use of young bulls on genetic gain.
    Buch LH; Sørensen MK; Berg P; Pedersen LD; Sørensen AC
    J Anim Breed Genet; 2012 Apr; 129(2):138-51. PubMed ID: 22394236
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Invited review: Genomic selection in dairy cattle: progress and challenges.
    Hayes BJ; Bowman PJ; Chamberlain AJ; Goddard ME
    J Dairy Sci; 2009 Feb; 92(2):433-43. PubMed ID: 19164653
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Performance of
    Mustafa HM; Hayder G
    Heliyon; 2021 Jan; 7(1):e06040. PubMed ID: 33537482
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Optimization of alternative breeding schemes for the genetic improvement of common Tigray highland sheep in northern Ethiopia.
    Haileselassie KW; Kebede SA; Letta MU; GebreMichael SG
    Genet Sel Evol; 2022 Sep; 54(1):63. PubMed ID: 36114447
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Optimal strategies for the use of genomic selection in dairy cattle breeding programs.
    Wensch-Dorendorf M; Yin T; Swalve HH; König S
    J Dairy Sci; 2011 Aug; 94(8):4140-51. PubMed ID: 21787949
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Effects of genomic selection on genetic improvement, inbreeding, and merit of young versus proven bulls.
    de Roos AP; Schrooten C; Veerkamp RF; van Arendonk JA
    J Dairy Sci; 2011 Mar; 94(3):1559-67. PubMed ID: 21338821
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.