These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

175 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26954236)

  • 1. Annual trainer peer-review: impact on educational practice and sense of community.
    Sneddon A; MacVicar R
    Educ Prim Care; 2016 Mar; 27(2):114-20. PubMed ID: 26954236
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The peer review pilot project: a potential system to support GP appraisal in NHS Scotland?
    Murie J; McCrae J; Bowie P
    Educ Prim Care; 2009 Jan; 20(1):34-40. PubMed ID: 19618650
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Barriers and attitudes influencing non-engagement in a peer feedback model to inform evidence for GP appraisal.
    Curnock E; Bowie P; Pope L; McKay J
    BMC Med Educ; 2012 Mar; 12():15. PubMed ID: 22443714
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. GP experiences of partner and external peer appraisal: a qualitative study.
    McKinstry B; Peacock H; Shaw J
    Br J Gen Pract; 2005 Jul; 55(516):539-43. PubMed ID: 16004740
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Verifying appraisal evidence using feedback from trained peers: views and experiences of Scottish GP appraisers.
    Bowie P; Cameron N; Staples I; McMillan R; McKay J; Lough M
    Br J Gen Pract; 2009 Jul; 59(564):484-9. PubMed ID: 19566997
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Preliminary codesign and testing of a feedback tool to improve the quality of peer appraiser documentation for medical revalidation.
    Murie J; MacWalter G; Bowie P
    Educ Prim Care; 2019 Jan; 30(1):22-28. PubMed ID: 30376417
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Variations in the ability of general medical practitioners to apply two methods of clinical audit: A five-year study of assessment by peer review.
    McKay J; Bowie P; Lough M
    J Eval Clin Pract; 2006 Dec; 12(6):622-9. PubMed ID: 17100861
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Appraisal of family doctors: an evaluation study.
    Lewis M; Elwyn G; Wood F
    Br J Gen Pract; 2003 Jun; 53(491):454-60. PubMed ID: 12939890
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The benefits of appraisal: a critical (re)view of the literature.
    Scallan S; Locke R; Eksteen D; Caesar S
    Educ Prim Care; 2016 Mar; 27(2):94-7. PubMed ID: 26915657
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Does appraisal enhance learning, improve practice and encourage continuing professional development? A survey of general practitioners' experiences of appraisal.
    Finlay K; McLaren S
    Qual Prim Care; 2009; 17(6):387-95. PubMed ID: 20051189
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Impact of revalidation on appraisal in primary care: an initial evaluation of the experience of Welsh GPs.
    Williams S; Holmes S; Laugharne K
    Educ Prim Care; 2016 Mar; 27(2):121-8. PubMed ID: 27005839
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The implications of enhancing appraisal to meet the requirements of revalidation, as perceived by appraisers: a qualitative study in Scotland.
    Wakeling J; Cameron N
    Educ Prim Care; 2011 Nov; 22(6):377-85. PubMed ID: 22413658
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. External feedback in general practice: a focus group study of trained peer reviewers of significant event analyses.
    McKay J; Pope L; Bowie P; Lough M
    J Eval Clin Pract; 2009 Feb; 15(1):142-7. PubMed ID: 19239594
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Exploring the experiences of general practice nurse peer appraisers.
    Ferguson J; Kennedy S
    Educ Prim Care; 2014 Sep; 25(5):268-75. PubMed ID: 25625834
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Multisource feedback questionnaires in appraisal and for revalidation: a qualitative study in UK general practice.
    Hill JJ; Asprey A; Richards SH; Campbell JL
    Br J Gen Pract; 2012 May; 62(598):e314-21. PubMed ID: 22546590
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. GP perceptions of appraisal: professional development, performance management, or both?
    Boylan O; Bradley T; McKnight A
    Br J Gen Pract; 2005 Jul; 55(516):544-5. PubMed ID: 16004741
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. What do doctors really think about the relevance and impact of GP appraisal 3 years on? A survey of Scottish GPs.
    Colthart I; Cameron N; McKinstry B; Blaney D
    Br J Gen Pract; 2008 Feb; 58(547):82-7. PubMed ID: 18307850
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The general practitioner workforce crisis in England: a qualitative study of how appraisal and revalidation are contributing to intentions to leave practice.
    Dale J; Potter R; Owen K; Leach J
    BMC Fam Pract; 2016 Jul; 17():84. PubMed ID: 27439982
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Audit of annual medical appraisal and revalidation activity across the UK Defence Medical Services 2013-2014.
    Morris LE; Withnall R
    J R Army Med Corps; 2017 Feb; 163(1):23-26. PubMed ID: 26759502
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The meaning of co-production for clinicians: An exploratory case study of Practitioner Trainers in one Recovery College.
    Dalgarno M; Oates J
    J Psychiatr Ment Health Nurs; 2018 Jun; 25(5-6):349-357. PubMed ID: 29763995
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.