These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

154 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26955359)

  • 1. Assessment of Tobacco-Related Approach and Attentional Biases in Smokers, Cravers, Ex-Smokers, and Non-Smokers.
    Woud ML; Maas J; Wiers RW; Becker ES; Rinck M
    Front Psychol; 2016; 7():172. PubMed ID: 26955359
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Attentional and evaluative biases for smoking cues in nicotine dependence: component processes of biases in visual orienting.
    Bradley B; Field M; Mogg K; De Houwer J
    Behav Pharmacol; 2004 Feb; 15(1):29-36. PubMed ID: 15075624
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. "Push it!" or "Hold it!"? A comparison of nicotine-avoidance training and nicotine-inhibition training in smokers motivated to quit.
    Machulska A; Rinck M; Klucken T; Kleinke K; Wunder JC; Remeniuk O; Margraf J
    Psychopharmacology (Berl); 2022 Jan; 239(1):105-121. PubMed ID: 35013762
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Implicit motivational processes underlying smoking in american and dutch adolescents.
    Larsen H; Kong G; Becker D; Cousijn J; Boendermaker W; Cavallo D; Krishnan-Sarin S; Wiers R
    Front Psychiatry; 2014; 5():51. PubMed ID: 24904435
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Selective attention to smoking cues in former smokers.
    Rehme AK; Bey K; Frommann I; Mogg K; Bradley BP; Bludau J; Block V; Sträter B; Schütz CG; Wagner M
    Eur Neuropsychopharmacol; 2018 Feb; 28(2):276-284. PubMed ID: 29371023
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Approach bias modification in inpatient psychiatric smokers.
    Machulska A; Zlomuzica A; Rinck M; Assion HJ; Margraf J
    J Psychiatr Res; 2016 May; 76():44-51. PubMed ID: 26874269
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Do the affective properties of smoking-related cues influence attentional and approach biases in cigarette smokers?
    Bradley BP; Field M; Healy H; Mogg K
    J Psychopharmacol; 2008 Sep; 22(7):737-45. PubMed ID: 18208922
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Top-down and bottom-up attentional biases for smoking-related stimuli: Comparing dependent and non-dependent smokers.
    Wilcockson TDW; Pothos EM; Osborne AM; Crawford TJ
    Addict Behav; 2021 Jul; 118():106886. PubMed ID: 33714035
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Attentional and approach biases for smoking cues in smokers: an investigation of competing theoretical views of addiction.
    Mogg K; Field M; Bradley BP
    Psychopharmacology (Berl); 2005 Jul; 180(2):333-41. PubMed ID: 15696322
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Temporal Dynamics of Smoking-Related Approach Biases: A Comparison Between Male Smokers and Nonsmokers.
    Wei XY; Chen HD; Li XW; Li XY; Li WJ
    J Stud Alcohol Drugs; 2020 Mar; 81(2):190-194. PubMed ID: 32359048
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Reliability of and associations between cognitive bias measures and response inhibition in smoking.
    Wittekind CE; Schiebel T; Kühn S
    J Behav Ther Exp Psychiatry; 2023 Dec; 81():101853. PubMed ID: 36947971
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Goal-driven attentional capture by appetitive and aversive smoking-related cues in nicotine-dependent smokers.
    Brown CRH; Forster S; Duka T
    Drug Alcohol Depend; 2018 Sep; 190():209-215. PubMed ID: 30055425
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Selective processing of smoking-related cues in current smokers, ex-smokers and never-smokers on the modified Stroop task.
    Munafò M; Mogg K; Roberts S; Bradley BP; Murphy M
    J Psychopharmacol; 2003 Sep; 17(3):310-6. PubMed ID: 14513923
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Association of serotonin transporter genotype with selective processing of smoking-related stimuli in current smokers and ex-smokers.
    Munafò MR; Johnstone EC; Mackintosh B
    Nicotine Tob Res; 2005 Oct; 7(5):773-8. PubMed ID: 16191748
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Eye movements to smoking-related pictures in smokers: relationship between attentional biases and implicit and explicit measures of stimulus valence.
    Mogg K; Bradley BP; Field M; De Houwer J
    Addiction; 2003 Jun; 98(6):825-36. PubMed ID: 12780371
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Implicit and explicit selective attention to smoking cues in smokers indexed by brain potentials.
    Littel M; Franken IH
    J Psychopharmacol; 2011 Apr; 25(4):503-13. PubMed ID: 20716580
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. An implicit pictorial methodology for measuring and retraining smokers' reactivity to pictures of pros and cons of smoking: development protocol.
    Elfeddali I; de Vries H
    Contemp Clin Trials Commun; 2016 Dec; 4():208-213. PubMed ID: 29736484
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The Attentional Bias in Current and Former Smokers.
    Masiero M; Lucchiari C; Maisonneuve P; Pravettoni G; Veronesi G; Mazzocco K
    Front Behav Neurosci; 2019; 13():154. PubMed ID: 31354446
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Use of eye movement to measure smokers' attentional bias to smoking-related cues.
    Kwak SM; Na DL; Kim G; Kim GS; Lee JH
    Cyberpsychol Behav; 2007 Apr; 10(2):299-304. PubMed ID: 17474851
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Attentional avoidance of smoking cues in former smokers.
    Peuker AC; Bizarro L
    J Subst Abuse Treat; 2014 Feb; 46(2):183-8. PubMed ID: 24074848
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.