These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

163 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26955581)

  • 1. Photopatch and UV-irradiated patch testing in photosensitive dermatitis.
    Rai R; Thomas M
    Indian Dermatol Online J; 2016; 7(1):12-6. PubMed ID: 26955581
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Photopatch testing: the 12-year experience of the German, Austrian, and Swiss photopatch test group.
    Neumann NJ; Hölzle E; Plewig G; Schwarz T; Panizzon RG; Breit R; Ruzicka T; Lehmann P
    J Am Acad Dermatol; 2000 Feb; 42(2 Pt 1):183-92. PubMed ID: 10642671
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Causal agents of photoallergic contact dermatitis diagnosed in the national institute of dermatology of Colombia.
    Rodríguez E; Valbuena MC; Rey M; Porras de Quintana L
    Photodermatol Photoimmunol Photomed; 2006 Aug; 22(4):189-92. PubMed ID: 16869867
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Photopatch testing in Bogota (Colombia): 2011-2013.
    Valbuena Mesa MC; Hoyos Jiménez EV
    Contact Dermatitis; 2016 Jan; 74(1):11-7. PubMed ID: 26086895
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Evaluation of photopatch test allergens for Indian patients of photodermatitis: preliminary results.
    Jindal N; Sharma NL; Mahajan VK; Shanker V; Tegta GR; Verma GK
    Indian J Dermatol Venereol Leprol; 2011; 77(2):148-55. PubMed ID: 21393943
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Occurrence of plant sensitivity among patients of photodermatoses: a control-matched study of 156 cases from New Delhi.
    Kar HK; Langar S; Arora TC; Sharma P; Raina A; Bhardwaj M
    Indian J Dermatol Venereol Leprol; 2009; 75(5):483-7. PubMed ID: 19736427
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Photoallergic contact dermatitis is uncommon.
    Darvay A; White IR; Rycroft RJ; Jones AB; Hawk JL; McFadden JP
    Br J Dermatol; 2001 Oct; 145(4):597-601. PubMed ID: 11703286
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Photopatch testing in a tropical country, Thailand: 20 years' experience.
    Chaiyabutr C; Sukakul T; Limphoka P; Kumpangsin T; Boonchai W
    Photodermatol Photoimmunol Photomed; 2021 Jan; 37(1):28-33. PubMed ID: 32816407
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Clinical, Occupational and Allergological Profile of 455 Patients with Occupational Contact Dermatitis: A 5-Year Study from a Tertiary Care Center of North India.
    Mahajan VK; Mehta KS; Chauhan PS; Sharma R; Sharma A; Verma YR; Chandel M; Sharma H; Sharma J; Singh VK; Hooda S
    Indian Dermatol Online J; 2021; 12(4):541-548. PubMed ID: 34430457
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Evaluation of photopatch test series in India.
    Sharma VK; Sethuraman G; Bansal A
    Contact Dermatitis; 2007 Mar; 56(3):168-9. PubMed ID: 17295695
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Patch Test as a Diagnostic Tool in Hand Eczema.
    Vigneshkarthik N; Ganguly S; Kuruvila S
    J Clin Diagn Res; 2016 Nov; 10(11):WC04-WC07. PubMed ID: 28050486
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Assessment of Skin Photoallergy Risk in Cosmetics Containing Herbal Extract Ingredients.
    Pan N; Xia Y; Hou W; Zhu G; Zhang J; Lai W; Zheng Y
    Skin Pharmacol Physiol; 2021; 34(5):253-261. PubMed ID: 34198300
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Successful photopatch testing with ketoprofen using one-hour occlusion.
    Marmgren V; Hindsén M; Zimerson E; Bruze M
    Acta Derm Venereol; 2011 Mar; 91(2):131-6. PubMed ID: 21327321
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Dioxopromethazine-induced photoallergic contact dermatitis followed by persistent light reaction.
    Schauder S
    Am J Contact Dermat; 1998 Sep; 9(3):182-7. PubMed ID: 9744913
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Visible light photopatch testing of common photocontactants in female filipino adults with and without melasma: a cross-sectional study.
    Verallo-Rowell VM; Pua JM; Bautista D
    J Drugs Dermatol; 2008 Feb; 7(2):149-56. PubMed ID: 18335651
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The frequency and causes of photoallergic contact dermatitis among dermatology outpatients.
    Spiewak R
    Acta Dermatovenerol Croat; 2013; 21(4):230-5. PubMed ID: 24476609
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Octocrylene, an emerging photoallergen.
    Avenel-Audran M; Dutartre H; Goossens A; Jeanmougin M; Comte C; Bernier C; Benkalfate L; Michel M; Ferrier-Lebouëdec MC; Vigan M; Bourrain JL; Outtas O; Peyron JL; Martin L
    Arch Dermatol; 2010 Jul; 146(7):753-7. PubMed ID: 20644036
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Sunscreen photopatch testing: a series of 157 children.
    Haylett AK; Chiang YZ; Nie Z; Ling TC; Rhodes LE
    Br J Dermatol; 2014 Aug; 171(2):370-5. PubMed ID: 24673302
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Can a positive photopatch test be elicited by subclinical irritancy or allergy plus suberythemal UV exposure?
    Beattie PE; Traynor NJ; Woods JA; Dawe RS; Ferguson J; Ibbotson SH
    Contact Dermatitis; 2004; 51(5-6):235-40. PubMed ID: 15606647
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Contact and photocontact sensitivity to sunscreens. Review of a 15-year experience and of the literature.
    Schauder S; Ippen H
    Contact Dermatitis; 1997 Nov; 37(5):221-32. PubMed ID: 9412750
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.