389 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26955833)
1. Roughness and wettability effect on histological and mechanical response of self-drilling orthodontic mini-implants.
Espinar-Escalona E; Bravo-Gonzalez LA; Pegueroles M; Gil FJ
Clin Oral Investig; 2016 Jun; 20(5):1115-20. PubMed ID: 26955833
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Biomechanical and histomorphometric properties of four different mini-implant surfaces.
Yadav S; Upadhyay M; Roberts WE
Eur J Orthod; 2015 Dec; 37(6):627-35. PubMed ID: 25681126
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Relationship between surface properties (roughness, wettability and morphology) of titanium and dental implant removal torque.
Elias CN; Oshida Y; Lima JH; Muller CA
J Mech Behav Biomed Mater; 2008 Jul; 1(3):234-42. PubMed ID: 19627788
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Early endosseous integration enhanced by dual acid etching of titanium: a torque removal study in the rabbit.
Klokkevold PR; Johnson P; Dadgostari S; Caputo A; Davies JE; Nishimura RD
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2001 Aug; 12(4):350-7. PubMed ID: 11488864
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Histomorphological and torque removal comparison of 6 mm orthodontic miniscrews with and without surface treatment in New Zealand rabbits.
Sirisa-Ard A; Woodroffe Michael SN; Ahmed K; Dunstan CR; Pearce SG; Bilgin AA; Dalci O; Darendeliler MA
Eur J Orthod; 2015 Dec; 37(6):578-83. PubMed ID: 25608834
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Removal torque values of surface-treated mini-implants after loading.
Kim SH; Cho JH; Chung KR; Kook YA; Nelson G
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2008 Jul; 134(1):36-43. PubMed ID: 18617101
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Effects of acid etching and calcium chloride immersion on removal torque and bone-cutting ability of orthodontic mini-implants.
Jang TH; Park JH; Moon W; Chae JM; Chang NY; Kang KH
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2018 Jul; 154(1):108-114. PubMed ID: 29957307
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Laser-treated stainless steel mini-screw implants: 3D surface roughness, bone-implant contact, and fracture resistance analysis.
Kang HK; Chu TM; Dechow P; Stewart K; Kyung HM; Liu SS
Eur J Orthod; 2016 Apr; 38(2):154-62. PubMed ID: 25908868
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Rotational resistance of surface-treated mini-implants.
Kim SH; Lee SJ; Cho IS; Kim SK; Kim TW
Angle Orthod; 2009 Sep; 79(5):899-907. PubMed ID: 19705943
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Removal torque and histomorphometric investigation of 4 different titanium surfaces: an experimental study in the rabbit tibia.
Cordioli G; Majzoub Z; Piattelli A; Scarano A
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2000; 15(5):668-74. PubMed ID: 11055134
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Osseointegration of zirconia implants with different surface characteristics: an evaluation in rabbits.
Hoffmann O; Angelov N; Zafiropoulos GG; Andreana S
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2012; 27(2):352-8. PubMed ID: 22442775
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. A torque removal study on the primary stability of orthodontic titanium screw mini-implants in the cortical bone of dog femurs.
Okazaki J; Komasa Y; Sakai D; Kamada A; Ikeo T; Toda I; Suwa F; Inoue M; Etoh T
Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2008 Jul; 37(7):647-50. PubMed ID: 18554870
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Resistance to immediate orthodontic loading of surface-treated mini-implants.
Mo SS; Kim SH; Kook YA; Jeong DM; Chung KR; Nelson G
Angle Orthod; 2010 Jan; 80(1):123-9. PubMed ID: 19852651
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Comparison of different surface modifications for titanium implants installed into the goat iliac crest.
van Oirschot BA; Meijer GJ; Bronkhorst EM; Närhi T; Jansen JA; van den Beucken JJ
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2016 Feb; 27(2):e57-67. PubMed ID: 25486997
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The effect of microrough surface treatment on miniscrews used as orthodontic anchors.
Chang CS; Lee TM; Chang CH; Liu JK
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2009 Oct; 20(10):1178-84. PubMed ID: 19531105
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Bone tissue responses to surface-modified zirconia implants: A histomorphometric and removal torque study in the rabbit.
Sennerby L; Dasmah A; Larsson B; Iverhed M
Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2005; 7 Suppl 1():S13-20. PubMed ID: 16137083
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Influence of implant surface topography on bone-regenerative potential and mechanical retention in the human maxilla and mandible.
Wei N; Bin S; Jing Z; Wei S; Yingqiong Z
Am J Dent; 2014 Jun; 27(3):171-6. PubMed ID: 25208367
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Bone responses to titanium implants surface-roughened by sandblasted and double etched treatments in a rabbit model.
Yang GL; He FM; Yang XF; Wang XX; Zhao SF
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2008 Oct; 106(4):516-24. PubMed ID: 18602288
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Mechanical evaluation of orthodontic mini-implants of different lengths.
Pithon MM; Figueiredo DS; Oliveira DD
J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2013 Mar; 71(3):479-86. PubMed ID: 23273488
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Effect of autoclaving on the fracture torque of mini-implants used for orthodontic anchorage.
Mattos CT; Ruellas AC; Sant'anna EF
J Orthod; 2011 Mar; 38(1):15-20. PubMed ID: 21367824
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
