These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

171 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26957567)

  • 1. Calibrating Parameters for Microsimulation Disease Models: A Review and Comparison of Different Goodness-of-Fit Criteria.
    van der Steen A; van Rosmalen J; Kroep S; van Hees F; Steyerberg EW; de Koning HJ; van Ballegooijen M; Lansdorp-Vogelaar I
    Med Decis Making; 2016 Jul; 36(5):652-65. PubMed ID: 26957567
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Multiobjective Calibration of Disease Simulation Models Using Gaussian Processes.
    Sai A; Vivas-Valencia C; Imperiale TF; Kong N
    Med Decis Making; 2019 Jul; 39(5):540-552. PubMed ID: 31375053
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Calibrating models in economic evaluation: a comparison of alternative measures of goodness of fit, parameter search strategies and convergence criteria.
    Karnon J; Vanni T
    Pharmacoeconomics; 2011 Jan; 29(1):51-62. PubMed ID: 21142278
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Percent residual accuracy for quantifying goodness-of-fit of linear calibration curves.
    Logue BA; Manandhar E
    Talanta; 2018 Nov; 189():527-533. PubMed ID: 30086955
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Calibration of disease simulation model using an engineering approach.
    Kong CY; McMahon PM; Gazelle GS
    Value Health; 2009 Jun; 12(4):521-9. PubMed ID: 19900254
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Calibration and Validation of the Colorectal Cancer and Adenoma Incidence and Mortality (CRC-AIM) Microsimulation Model Using Deep Neural Networks.
    Vahdat V; Alagoz O; Chen JV; Saoud L; Borah BJ; Limburg PJ
    Med Decis Making; 2023 Aug; 43(6):719-736. PubMed ID: 37434445
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Bayesian Calibration of Microsimulation Models.
    Rutter CM; Miglioretti DL; Savarino JE
    J Am Stat Assoc; 2009 Dec; 104(488):1338-1350. PubMed ID: 20076767
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Evaluation of Bayesian spatiotemporal infectious disease models for prospective surveillance analysis.
    Kim J; Lawson AB; Neelon B; Korte JE; Eberth JM; Chowell G
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2023 Jul; 23(1):171. PubMed ID: 37481553
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Evaluating the goodness of fit in models of sparse medical data: a simulation approach.
    Boyle P; Flowerdew R; Williams A
    Int J Epidemiol; 1997 Jun; 26(3):651-6. PubMed ID: 9222792
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Restricted Recalibration of Item Response Theory Models.
    Liu Y; Yang JS; Maydeu-Olivares A
    Psychometrika; 2019 Jun; 84(2):529-553. PubMed ID: 30895437
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Calibration of individual-based models to epidemiological data: A systematic review.
    Hazelbag CM; Dushoff J; Dominic EM; Mthombothi ZE; Delva W
    PLoS Comput Biol; 2020 May; 16(5):e1007893. PubMed ID: 32392252
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Emulator-Based Bayesian Calibration of the CISNET Colorectal Cancer Models.
    Pineda-Antunez C; Seguin C; van Duuren LA; Knudsen AB; Davidi B; Nascimento de Lima P; Rutter C; Kuntz KM; Lansdorp-Vogelaar I; Collier N; Ozik J; Alarid-Escudero F
    Med Decis Making; 2024 Jun; ():272989X241255618. PubMed ID: 38858832
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Investigating the effects of the fixed and varying dispersion parameters of Poisson-gamma models on empirical Bayes estimates.
    Lord D; Park PY
    Accid Anal Prev; 2008 Jul; 40(4):1441-57. PubMed ID: 18606278
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Reclassification calibration test for censored survival data: performance and comparison to goodness-of-fit criteria.
    Demler OV; Paynter NP; Cook NR
    Diagn Progn Res; 2018; 2():. PubMed ID: 30984876
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Microsimulation Model Calibration with Approximate Bayesian Computation in R: A Tutorial.
    Shewmaker P; Chrysanthopoulou SA; Iskandar R; Lake D; Jutkowitz E
    Med Decis Making; 2022 Jul; 42(5):557-570. PubMed ID: 35311401
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. A new test and graphical tool to assess the goodness of fit of logistic regression models.
    Nattino G; Finazzi S; Bertolini G
    Stat Med; 2016 Feb; 35(5):709-20. PubMed ID: 26439593
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Goodness-of-fit tests for modified Poisson regression possibly producing fitted values exceeding one in binary outcome analysis.
    Hagiwara Y; Matsuyama Y
    Stat Methods Med Res; 2024 May; ():9622802241254220. PubMed ID: 38780488
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Calibrating models in economic evaluation: a seven-step approach.
    Vanni T; Karnon J; Madan J; White RG; Edmunds WJ; Foss AM; Legood R
    Pharmacoeconomics; 2011 Jan; 29(1):35-49. PubMed ID: 21142277
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Bayesian versus Empirical Calibration of Microsimulation Models: A Comparative Analysis.
    Chrysanthopoulou SA; Rutter CM; Gatsonis CA
    Med Decis Making; 2021 Aug; 41(6):714-726. PubMed ID: 33966518
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Modeling motor vehicle crashes using Poisson-gamma models: examining the effects of low sample mean values and small sample size on the estimation of the fixed dispersion parameter.
    Lord D
    Accid Anal Prev; 2006 Jul; 38(4):751-66. PubMed ID: 16545328
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.