214 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26957915)
1. F-18 Sodium Fluoride Positron Emission Tomography/Computed Tomography for Detection of Thyroid Cancer Bone Metastasis Compared with Bone Scintigraphy.
Lee H; Lee WW; Park SY; Kim SE
Korean J Radiol; 2016; 17(2):281-8. PubMed ID: 26957915
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Anatomical distribution and sclerotic activity of bone metastases from thyroid cancer assessed with F-18 sodium fluoride positron emission tomography.
Schirrmeister H; Buck A; Guhlmann A; Reske SN
Thyroid; 2001 Jul; 11(7):677-83. PubMed ID: 11484897
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Comparison of the diagnostic and prognostic values of 99mTc-MDP-planar bone scintigraphy, 131I-SPECT/CT and 18F-FDG-PET/CT for the detection of bone metastases from differentiated thyroid cancer.
Qiu ZL; Xue YL; Song HJ; Luo QY
Nucl Med Commun; 2012 Dec; 33(12):1232-42. PubMed ID: 23111353
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The diagnostic and prognostic effectiveness of F-18 sodium fluoride PET-CT in detecting bone metastases for hepatocellular carcinoma patients.
Yen RF; Chen CY; Cheng MF; Wu YW; Shiau YC; Wu K; Hong RL; Yu CJ; Wang KL; Yang RS
Nucl Med Commun; 2010 Jul; 31(7):637-45. PubMed ID: 20389259
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. 18F-Fluoride PET/CT for detection of bone metastasis in patients with renal cell carcinoma: a pilot study.
Sharma P; Karunanithi S; Chakraborty PS; Kumar R; Seth A; Julka PK; Bal C; Kumar R
Nucl Med Commun; 2014 Dec; 35(12):1247-53. PubMed ID: 25171438
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. A meta-analysis of (18)F-Fluoride positron emission tomography for assessment of metastatic bone tumor.
Tateishi U; Morita S; Taguri M; Shizukuishi K; Minamimoto R; Kawaguchi M; Murano T; Terauchi T; Inoue T; Kim EE
Ann Nucl Med; 2010 Aug; 24(7):523-31. PubMed ID: 20559896
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. The detection of bone metastases in patients with high-risk prostate cancer: 99mTc-MDP Planar bone scintigraphy, single- and multi-field-of-view SPECT, 18F-fluoride PET, and 18F-fluoride PET/CT.
Even-Sapir E; Metser U; Mishani E; Lievshitz G; Lerman H; Leibovitch I
J Nucl Med; 2006 Feb; 47(2):287-97. PubMed ID: 16455635
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Comparison of 18F fluoride PET/CT and 99mTc-MDP bone scan in the detection of skeletal metastases in urinary bladder carcinoma.
Chakraborty D; Bhattacharya A; Mete UK; Mittal BR
Clin Nucl Med; 2013 Aug; 38(8):616-21. PubMed ID: 23603596
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Comparison of (18)F-FDG-PET/CT with (99m)Tc-MDP bone scintigraphy for the detection of bone metastases in cancer patients.
Ozülker T; Küçüköz Uzun A; Ozülker F; Ozpaçac T
Nucl Med Commun; 2010 Jun; 31(6):597-603. PubMed ID: 20224457
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Comparison of ¹⁸F-fluoride PET/CT, ¹⁸F-FDG PET/CT and bone scintigraphy (planar and SPECT) in detection of bone metastases of differentiated thyroid cancer: a pilot study.
Ota N; Kato K; Iwano S; Ito S; Abe S; Fujita N; Yamashiro K; Yamamoto S; Naganawa S
Br J Radiol; 2014 Feb; 87(1034):20130444. PubMed ID: 24297809
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Prospective comparison of whole-body bone SPECT and sodium 18F-fluoride PET in the detection of bone metastases from breast cancer.
Abikhzer G; Srour S; Fried G; Drumea K; Kozlener E; Frenkel A; Israel O; Fogelman I; Kagna O
Nucl Med Commun; 2016 Nov; 37(11):1160-8. PubMed ID: 27536906
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Prospective Comparison of 99mTc-MDP Scintigraphy, Combined 18F-NaF and 18F-FDG PET/CT, and Whole-Body MRI in Patients with Breast and Prostate Cancer.
Minamimoto R; Loening A; Jamali M; Barkhodari A; Mosci C; Jackson T; Obara P; Taviani V; Gambhir SS; Vasanawala S; Iagaru A
J Nucl Med; 2015 Dec; 56(12):1862-8. PubMed ID: 26405167
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Detection of bone metastases in patients with lung cancer: 99mTc-MDP planar bone scintigraphy, 18F-fluoride PET or 18F-FDG PET/CT.
Krüger S; Buck AK; Mottaghy FM; Hasenkamp E; Pauls S; Schumann C; Wibmer T; Merk T; Hombach V; Reske SN
Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging; 2009 Nov; 36(11):1807-12. PubMed ID: 19504092
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. F-18 NaF PET for detection of bone metastases in lung cancer: accuracy, cost-effectiveness, and impact on patient management.
Hetzel M; Arslandemir C; König HH; Buck AK; Nüssle K; Glatting G; Gabelmann A; Hetzel J; Hombach V; Schirrmeister H
J Bone Miner Res; 2003 Dec; 18(12):2206-14. PubMed ID: 14672356
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. 18F-Fluoride positron emission tomography and positron emission tomography/computed tomography.
Even-Sapir E; Mishani E; Flusser G; Metser U
Semin Nucl Med; 2007 Nov; 37(6):462-9. PubMed ID: 17920353
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. (18)F-fluoride positron emission tomography/computed tomography and bone scintigraphy for diagnosis of bone metastases in newly diagnosed, high-risk prostate cancer patients: study protocol for a multicentre, diagnostic test accuracy study.
Fonager RF; Zacho HD; Langkilde NC; Petersen LJ
BMC Cancer; 2016 Jan; 16():10. PubMed ID: 26753880
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Detection of bone metastases in breast cancer patients in the PET/CT era: Do we still need the bone scan?
Caglar M; Kupik O; Karabulut E; Høilund-Carlsen PF
Rev Esp Med Nucl Imagen Mol; 2016; 35(1):3-11. PubMed ID: 26514321
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Prospective comparative study of
Fonager RF; Zacho HD; Langkilde NC; Fledelius J; Ejlersen JA; Hendel HW; Haarmark C; Moe M; Mortensen JC; Jochumsen MR; Petersen LJ
Acta Oncol; 2018 Aug; 57(8):1063-1069. PubMed ID: 29447047
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. [Evaluation of bone scintigraphy and (18)F-FDG PET/CT in bone metastases of lung cancer patients].
Portilla-Quattrociocchi H; Banzo I; Martínez-Rodríguez I; Quirce R; Jiménez-Bonilla J; de Arcocha Torres M; Medina-Quiroz P; del Castillo R; Rubio-Vassallo A; Carril JM
Rev Esp Med Nucl; 2011; 30(1):2-7. PubMed ID: 21208693
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20.
Wondergem M; van der Zant FM; Knol RJJ; Burgers AMG; Bos SD; de Jong IJ; Pruim J
World J Urol; 2018 Jan; 36(1):27-34. PubMed ID: 29043431
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
