These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

129 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 269601)

  • 1. The accuracy and consistency of the cytologic classification of squamous lesions of the uterine cervix.
    Kern Wh; Zivolich MR
    Acta Cytol; 1977; 21(4):519-23. PubMed ID: 269601
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Cytologic and histologic diagnosis and significance of controversial squamous lesions of the uterine cervix.
    Duggan MA
    Mod Pathol; 2000 Mar; 13(3):252-60. PubMed ID: 10757336
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. DNA-cytometric diagnosis of prospective malignancy in borderline lesions of the uterine cervix.
    Böcking A; Hilgarth M; Auffermann W; Hack-Werdier C; Fischer-Becker D; von Kalkreuth G
    Acta Cytol; 1986; 30(6):608-15. PubMed ID: 3466496
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A, B & H isoantigens in cervical lesions.
    Bisht D; Misra V; Gupta SC; Mehrotra R; Garg S
    Indian J Pathol Microbiol; 1998 Jan; 41(1):11-4. PubMed ID: 9581070
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Laboratory reliability of the Papanicolaou smear.
    Yobs AR; Swanson RA; Lamotte LC
    Obstet Gynecol; 1985 Feb; 65(2):235-44. PubMed ID: 3969236
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Screening errors in cervical cytologic screening.
    van der Graaf Y; Vooijs GP; Gaillard HL; Go DM
    Acta Cytol; 1987; 31(4):434-8. PubMed ID: 3604538
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. [Evaluation of severe dysplasia and carcinoma in situ detected by directed biopsy].
    Milojković M; Makarović Z; Pajtler M
    Jugosl Ginekol Perinatol; 1989; 29(5-6):198-200. PubMed ID: 2640269
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The combined use of cytology and colposcopy in enhancing diagnostic accuracy in preclinical lesions of the uterine cervix.
    Lozowski MS; Mishriki Y; Talebian F; Solitare G
    Acta Cytol; 1982; 26(3):285-91. PubMed ID: 6954809
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Microinvasive carcinoma and inflammatory lesions of the cervix uteri: histologic and cytologic differentiation.
    Alousi MA; Ballard LA; Reilly JV; Alousi SS
    Acta Cytol; 1967; 11(2):132-6. PubMed ID: 5230452
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A comparison of preoperative exfoliative cervical cytology with subsequent histology.
    Parker A; Ueki M
    N Z Med J; 1986 Jun; 99(803):414-6. PubMed ID: 3461355
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. False-negative Papanicolaou smears from women with cancerous and precancerous lesions of the uterine cervix.
    Pairwuti S
    Acta Cytol; 1991; 35(1):40-6. PubMed ID: 1994633
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. [Cytological classification of precancer and cancer of the cervix uteri].
    Agamova KA; Nikitina NI; Gosh TE; Tikhomirova EE; Gladunova ZD
    Vopr Onkol; 1987; 33(5):54-9. PubMed ID: 3590668
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. [Results of prospective cytological diagnoses of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia].
    Saks A; Kodric T; Novak S; Vlaisavljević V
    Jugosl Ginekol Opstet; 1983; 23(5-6):103-6. PubMed ID: 6678996
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. [Cytological differential diagnostic accuracy in severe dysplasia and carcinoma in situ of the cervix and possible clinical consequences (author's transl)].
    Schuhmann RA; Kraus H; Geier G
    Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd; 1981 Oct; 41(10):668-71. PubMed ID: 6914976
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Diagnostic accuracy of squamous cervical lesions studied in spatula-cytobrush smears.
    Alons-van Kordelaar JJ; Boon ME
    Acta Cytol; 1988; 32(6):801-4. PubMed ID: 3059733
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Evaluation of the abnormal Pap smear.
    Homesley HD
    Am Fam Physician; 1977 Sep; 16(3):190-4. PubMed ID: 900003
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. [Diagnostic conization of the uterine cervix. II. Comparison of histological diagnoses with cytological and colposcopic tentative diagnoses].
    Geissler U
    Zentralbl Gynakol; 1977; 99(17):1028-32. PubMed ID: 919877
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Cytology and colposcopy in the diagnosis and management of outpatients with cervical intraepithelial neoplasia.
    Allahverdian V; Valaitis J; Kalis O; Pearlman S
    J Reprod Med; 1980 Jan; 24(1):1-4. PubMed ID: 7359496
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Severe cervical glandular cell lesions with coexisting squamous cell lesions.
    van Aspert-van Erp AJ; Smedts FM; Vooijs GP
    Cancer; 2004 Aug; 102(4):218-27. PubMed ID: 15368313
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The identification of atypical reserve cells in smears of patients with premalignant and malignant changes in the squamous and glandular epithelium of the uterine cervix.
    Beyer-Boon ME; Verdonk GW
    Acta Cytol; 1978; 22(5):305-11. PubMed ID: 281835
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.