These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

255 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26960424)

  • 1. Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: Relationship Between Procedural Volume and Outcomes.
    Badheka AO; Panaich SS; Arora S; Patel N; Patel NJ; Savani C; Deshmukh A; Cohen MG
    Curr Cardiol Rep; 2016 Apr; 18(4):39. PubMed ID: 26960424
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Outcomes of PCI in Relation to Procedural Characteristics and Operator Volumes in the United States.
    Fanaroff AC; Zakroysky P; Dai D; Wojdyla D; Sherwood MW; Roe MT; Wang TY; Peterson ED; Gurm HS; Cohen MG; Messenger JC; Rao SV
    J Am Coll Cardiol; 2017 Jun; 69(24):2913-2924. PubMed ID: 28619191
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Relationship Between Operator Volume and Long-Term Outcomes After Percutaneous Coronary Intervention.
    Fanaroff AC; Zakroysky P; Wojdyla D; Kaltenbach LA; Sherwood MW; Roe MT; Wang TY; Peterson ED; Gurm HS; Cohen MG; Messenger JC; Rao SV
    Circulation; 2019 Jan; 139(4):458-472. PubMed ID: 30586696
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Outcomes of percutaneous coronary interventions performed at centers without and with onsite coronary artery bypass graft surgery.
    Wennberg DE; Lucas FL; Siewers AE; Kellett MA; Malenka DJ
    JAMA; 2004 Oct; 292(16):1961-8. PubMed ID: 15507581
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Outcomes and Temporal Trends of Inpatient Percutaneous Coronary Intervention at Centers With and Without On-site Cardiac Surgery in the United States.
    Goel K; Gupta T; Kolte D; Khera S; Fonarow GC; Bhatt DL; Singh M; Rihal CS
    JAMA Cardiol; 2017 Jan; 2(1):25-33. PubMed ID: 27893054
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Relation Between Operator and Hospital Volumes and Long-Term Outcomes for Percutaneous Coronary Intervention in New York.
    Qian F; Zhong Y; Hannan EL
    Am J Cardiol; 2020 Mar; 125(5):694-711. PubMed ID: 31924317
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Prevalence, Trends, and Outcomes of Higher-Risk Percutaneous Coronary Interventions Among Patients Without Acute Coronary Syndromes.
    Iverson A; Stanberry LI; Tajti P; Garberich R; Antos A; Burke MN; Chavez I; Gössl M; Henry TD; Lips D; Mooney M; Poulose A; Sorajja P; Traverse J; Wang Y; Bradley S; Brilakis ES
    Cardiovasc Revasc Med; 2019 Apr; 20(4):289-292. PubMed ID: 30054257
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Relationship between operator and hospital volumes and short-term mortality for percutaneous coronary intervention in New York.
    Qian F; Zhong Y; Hannan EL
    Int J Cardiol; 2019 Oct; 293():91-100. PubMed ID: 31104824
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The Impact of Formal Training and Certification on the Relationship Between Volume and Outcomes in Percutaneous Coronary Interventions.
    Dakik HA; Karowni W; El-Sibai K; Kobrossi S; Abdul-Ameer K; Tamim H
    Crit Pathw Cardiol; 2018 Sep; 17(3):155-160. PubMed ID: 30044257
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Acute coronary syndrome and stable coronary artery disease: are they so different? Long-term outcomes in a contemporary PCI cohort.
    Alcock RF; Yong AS; Ng AC; Chow V; Cheruvu C; Aliprandi-Costa B; Lowe HC; Kritharides L; Brieger DB
    Int J Cardiol; 2013 Aug; 167(4):1343-6. PubMed ID: 22534045
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Impact of Institutional and Operator Volume on Short-Term Outcomes of Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: A Report From the Japanese Nationwide Registry.
    Inohara T; Kohsaka S; Yamaji K; Amano T; Fujii K; Oda H; Uemura S; Kadota K; Miyata H; Nakamura M;
    JACC Cardiovasc Interv; 2017 May; 10(9):918-927. PubMed ID: 28473114
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Rate of percutaneous coronary intervention for the management of acute coronary syndromes and stable coronary artery disease in the United States (2007 to 2011).
    Kim LK; Feldman DN; Swaminathan RV; Minutello RM; Chanin J; Yang DC; Lee MK; Charitakis K; Shah A; Kaple RK; Bergman G; Singh H; Wong SC
    Am J Cardiol; 2014 Oct; 114(7):1003-10. PubMed ID: 25118124
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Percutaneous coronary intervention in patients with acute coronary syndrome in Chinese Military Hospitals, 2011-2014: a retrospective observational study of a national registry.
    Zhao R; Xu K; Li Y; Qiu M; Han Y;
    BMJ Open; 2018 Oct; 8(10):e023133. PubMed ID: 30361405
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Trends in proportions of hospitals and operators not meeting minimum percutaneous coronary intervention volume standards in Taiwan, 2001-2013.
    Liang FW; Lee JC; Lu TH; Yin WH
    Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2018 Aug; 92(2):247-250. PubMed ID: 28963782
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Impact of annual operator and institutional volume on percutaneous coronary intervention outcomes: a 5-year United States experience (2005-2009).
    Badheka AO; Patel NJ; Grover P; Singh V; Patel N; Arora S; Chothani A; Mehta K; Deshmukh A; Savani GT; Patel A; Panaich SS; Shah N; Rathod A; Brown M; Mohamad T; Tamburrino FV; Kar S; Makkar R; O'Neill WW; De Marchena E; Schreiber T; Grines CL; Rihal CS; Cohen MG
    Circulation; 2014 Oct; 130(16):1392-406. PubMed ID: 25189214
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Procedural volume and outcomes with radial or femoral access for coronary angiography and intervention.
    Jolly SS; Cairns J; Yusuf S; Niemela K; Steg PG; Worthley M; Ferrari E; Cantor WJ; Fung A; Valettas N; Rokoss M; Olivecrona GK; Widimsky P; Cheema AN; Gao P; Mehta SR;
    J Am Coll Cardiol; 2014 Mar; 63(10):954-63. PubMed ID: 24269362
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Relationship between operator volume and adverse outcome in contemporary percutaneous coronary intervention practice: an analysis of a quality-controlled multicenter percutaneous coronary intervention clinical database.
    Moscucci M; Share D; Smith D; O'Donnell MJ; Riba A; McNamara R; Lalonde T; Defranco AC; Patel K; Kline Rogers E; D'Haem C; Karve M; Eagle KA
    J Am Coll Cardiol; 2005 Aug; 46(4):625-32. PubMed ID: 16098426
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Impact of interventionalist volume, experience, and board certification on coronary angioplasty outcomes in the era of stenting.
    Harjai KJ; Berman AD; Grines CL; Kahn J; Marsalese D; Mehta RH; Schreiber T; Boura JA; O'Neill WW
    Am J Cardiol; 2004 Aug; 94(4):421-6. PubMed ID: 15325922
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Lower hospital volume is associated with higher in-hospital mortality in patients undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention for ST-segment-elevation myocardial infarction: A report from the NCDR.
    Kontos MC; Wang Y; Chaudhry SI; Vetrovec GW; Curtis J; Messenger J;
    Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes; 2013 Nov; 6(6):659-67. PubMed ID: 24192572
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The lack of a simple relation between physician's percutaneous coronary intervention volume and outcomes in the era of coronary stenting: a two-centre experience.
    Mustafa MU; Cohen M; Zapotulko K; Feinberg M; Miller MF; Aueron F; Wasty N; Tanwir A; Rogal G
    Int J Clin Pract; 2005 Dec; 59(12):1401-7. PubMed ID: 16351671
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 13.