164 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26960540)
1. Does size reliably predict malignancy in soft tissue tumours?
Gruber L; Loizides A; Ostermann L; Glodny B; Plaikner M; Gruber H
Eur Radiol; 2016 Dec; 26(12):4640-4648. PubMed ID: 26960540
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Soft-Tissue Tumor Contrast Enhancement Patterns: Diagnostic Value and Comparison Between Ultrasound and MRI.
Gruber L; Loizides A; Luger AK; Glodny B; Moser P; Henninger B; Gruber H
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2017 Feb; 208(2):393-401. PubMed ID: 27959625
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Differentiation of malignant from benign soft tissue tumours: use of additive qualitative and quantitative diffusion-weighted MR imaging to standard MR imaging at 3.0 T.
Lee SY; Jee WH; Jung JY; Park MY; Kim SK; Jung CK; Chung YG
Eur Radiol; 2016 Mar; 26(3):743-54. PubMed ID: 26080796
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. MRI to differentiate benign from malignant soft-tissue tumours of the extremities: a simplified systematic imaging approach using depth, size and heterogeneity of signal intensity.
Chung WJ; Chung HW; Shin MJ; Lee SH; Lee MH; Lee JS; Kim MJ; Lee WK
Br J Radiol; 2012 Oct; 85(1018):e831-6. PubMed ID: 22553293
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Peripheral vascular lesions in adults referred to MRI/MRA: Multivariable analysis of imaging features to help differentiate benign vascular anomalies from malignancies.
Zhao K; Melamud K; Hindman N
Clin Imaging; 2022 Nov; 91():45-51. PubMed ID: 35988473
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Diagnostic hierarchy of radiological features in soft tissue tumours and proposition of a simple diagnostic algorithm to estimate malignant potential of an unknown mass.
Gruber L; Gruber H; Luger AK; Glodny B; Henninger B; Loizides A
Eur J Radiol; 2017 Oct; 95():102-110. PubMed ID: 28987653
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Characterization of soft tissue tumours with ultrasound, shear wave elastography and MRI.
Winn N; Baldwin J; Cassar-Pullicino V; Cool P; Ockendon M; Tins B; Jaremko JL
Skeletal Radiol; 2020 Jun; 49(6):869-881. PubMed ID: 31897519
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Perfusion pattern and time of vascularisation with CEUS increase accuracy in differentiating between benign and malignant tumours in 216 musculoskeletal soft tissue masses.
De Marchi A; Prever EBD; Cavallo F; Pozza S; Linari A; Lombardo P; Comandone A; Piana R; Faletti C
Eur J Radiol; 2015 Jan; 84(1):142-150. PubMed ID: 25454097
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Development of a risk assessment model to differentiate malignant and benign musculoskeletal soft-tissue masses on magnetic resonance imaging.
Obaid H; Vassos N; Adams SJ; Bryce R; Donuru A; Sinclair N
J Med Imaging Radiat Oncol; 2020 Feb; 64(1):9-17. PubMed ID: 31793194
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Does Doppler analysis of musculoskeletal soft-tissue tumours help predict tumour malignancy?
Griffith JF; Chan DP; Kumta SM; Chow LT; Ahuja AT
Clin Radiol; 2004 Apr; 59(4):369-75. PubMed ID: 15041458
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. [Classification of solid soft tissue tumours by ultrasonography].
Schulte M; von Baer A; Schultheiss M; Scheil-Bertram S
Ultraschall Med; 2010 Apr; 31(2):182-90. PubMed ID: 20306381
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Benign vs malignant soft tissue neoplasms: limitations of magnetic resonance imaging.
Sen J; Agarwal S; Singh S; Sen R; Goel S
Indian J Cancer; 2010; 47(3):280-6. PubMed ID: 20587903
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Soft tissue masses with myxoid stroma: Can conventional magnetic resonance imaging differentiate benign from malignant tumors?
Crombe A; Alberti N; Stoeckle E; Brouste V; Buy X; Coindre JM; Kind M
Eur J Radiol; 2016 Oct; 85(10):1875-1882. PubMed ID: 27666630
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Differentiating benign and malignant soft tissue masses by magnetic resonance imaging: role of tissue component analysis.
Chen CK; Wu HT; Chiou HJ; Wei CJ; Yen CH; Chang CY; Chen WM
J Chin Med Assoc; 2009 Apr; 72(4):194-201. PubMed ID: 19372075
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Soft tissue masses: distribution of entities and rate of malignancy in small lesions.
Gassert FG; Gassert FT; Specht K; Knebel C; Lenze U; Makowski MR; von Eisenhart-Rothe R; Gersing AS; Woertler K
BMC Cancer; 2021 Jan; 21(1):93. PubMed ID: 33482754
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Differentiation of benign and malignant adnexal masses: relative value of gray-scale, color Doppler, and spectral Doppler sonography.
Stein SM; Laifer-Narin S; Johnson MB; Roman LD; Muderspach LI; Tyszka JM; Ralls PW
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1995 Feb; 164(2):381-6. PubMed ID: 7839975
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Prevalence and diagnostic significance of fluid-fluid levels in soft-tissue neoplasms.
Alyas F; Lee J; Ahmed M; Connell D; Saifuddin A
Clin Radiol; 2007 Aug; 62(8):769-74; discussion 775. PubMed ID: 17604765
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Evaluation of core needle biopsy as a substitute to open biopsy in the diagnosis of soft-tissue masses.
Ray-Coquard I; Ranchère-Vince D; Thiesse P; Ghesquières H; Biron P; Sunyach MP; Rivoire M; Lancry L; Méeus P; Sebban C; Blay JY
Eur J Cancer; 2003 Sep; 39(14):2021-5. PubMed ID: 12957456
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Are signal intensity and homogeneity useful parameters for distinguishing between benign and malignant soft tissue masses on MR images? Objective evaluation by means of texture analysis.
Mayerhoefer ME; Breitenseher M; Amann G; Dominkus M
Magn Reson Imaging; 2008 Nov; 26(9):1316-22. PubMed ID: 18448302
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Usefulness of diffusion-weighted MR imaging for differentiating between benign and malignant superficial soft tissue tumours and tumour-like lesions.
Jeon JY; Chung HW; Lee MH; Lee SH; Shin MJ
Br J Radiol; 2016; 89(1060):20150929. PubMed ID: 26892266
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
