298 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2696085)
1. Dangerousness and commitment of the mentally disordered in the United States.
Monahan J; Shah SA
Schizophr Bull; 1989; 15(4):541-53. PubMed ID: 2696085
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Components of dangerousness: legal standard in civil commitment.
Hiday VA; Markell SJ
Int J Law Psychiatry; 1980; 3(4):405-19. PubMed ID: 7275438
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Redefining dangerousness for civil commitment.
Rachlin S
Hosp Community Psychiatry; 1987 Aug; 38(8):884-6. PubMed ID: 3610091
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Decoding right to refuse treatment law.
Perlin ML
Int J Law Psychiatry; 1993; 16(1-2):151-77. PubMed ID: 8099069
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. The Squibb academic address. Human rights: the case for the mentally ill.
Mitchell R
Aust N Z J Psychiatry; 1984 Jun; 18(2):146-55. PubMed ID: 6593044
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Police power commitments: towards a legal response to violence among the mentally ill.
Neff RC
Univ Toledo Law Rev; 1982; 13(2):421-61. PubMed ID: 11658796
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Effects of the dangerousness standard in civil commitment.
Hiday VA; Smith LN
J Psychiatry Law; 1987; 15(3):433-54. PubMed ID: 11659010
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. An empirical comparison of the stone and dangerousness criteria for civil commitment.
Hoge SK; Appelbaum PS; Greer A
Am J Psychiatry; 1989 Feb; 146(2):170-5. PubMed ID: 2912258
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Civil commitment and the criminal insanity plea in Israeli law.
Toib JA
Int J Law Psychiatry; 2008; 31(4):308-18. PubMed ID: 18374417
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Outpatient civil commitment: a dangerous charade or a component of a comprehensive institution of civil commitment?
Schopp RF
Psychol Public Policy Law; 2003; 9(1-2):33-69. PubMed ID: 16700136
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The involuntary civil commitment of mentally ill persons in the United States and Romania: a comparative analysis.
Loue S
Rev Rom Bioet; 2003; 1(1):55-88. PubMed ID: 15011669
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Dangerousness: legal determinations and clinical speculations.
Birns H; Levien JS
Psychiatr Q; 1980; 52(2):108-31. PubMed ID: 7403374
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Involuntary psychiatric hospitalization: a review of the statutes regulating the social control of the mentally ill.
Gove WR; Tovo M; Hughes M
Deviant Behav; 1985; 6():287-318. PubMed ID: 11658830
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Involuntary treatment of the mentally ill: autonomy is asking the wrong question.
Klein DW
Vt Law Rev; 2003; 72(3):649-80. PubMed ID: 15568282
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. The obviously ill patient in need of treatment: a fourth standard for civil commitment.
Treffert DA
Hosp Community Psychiatry; 1985 Mar; 36(3):259-64. PubMed ID: 3979975
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Changes in the law have improved treatment of the mentally ill.
Sadoff RL
Hospitals; 1981 May; 55(9):61-4. PubMed ID: 7216207
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. A review of tort liability in involuntary civil commitment.
Knapp S; VandeCreek L
Hosp Community Psychiatry; 1987 Jun; 38(6):648-51. PubMed ID: 3596501
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The politics of mental health advocacy in the United States.
Wald PM; Friedman PR
Int J Law Psychiatry; 1978; 1(2):137-52. PubMed ID: 748194
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Eliminating mental disability as a legal criterion in deprivation of liberty cases: The impact of the Convention on the Rights of Persons With Disabilities on the insanity defense, civil commitment, and competency law.
Slobogin C
Int J Law Psychiatry; 2015; 40():36-42. PubMed ID: 25960445
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Changing trends in mental health legislation: anatomy of reforming a civil commitment law.
Aviram U; Weyer RA
J Health Polit Policy Law; 1996; 21(4):771-805. PubMed ID: 8892006
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
