These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

343 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26960967)

  • 1. Comparison of digital scanning and polyvinyl siloxane impression techniques by dental students: instructional efficiency and attitudes towards technology.
    Marti AM; Harris BT; Metz MJ; Morton D; Scarfe WC; Metz CJ; Lin WS
    Eur J Dent Educ; 2017 Aug; 21(3):200-205. PubMed ID: 26960967
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. 3D and 2D marginal fit of pressed and CAD/CAM lithium disilicate crowns made from digital and conventional impressions.
    Anadioti E; Aquilino SA; Gratton DG; Holloway JA; Denry I; Thomas GW; Qian F
    J Prosthodont; 2014 Dec; 23(8):610-7. PubMed ID: 24995593
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Clinical marginal fit of zirconia crowns and patients' preferences for impression techniques using intraoral digital scanner versus polyvinyl siloxane material.
    Sakornwimon N; Leevailoj C
    J Prosthet Dent; 2017 Sep; 118(3):386-391. PubMed ID: 28222872
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. An evaluation of student and clinician perception of digital and conventional implant impressions.
    Lee SJ; Macarthur RX; Gallucci GO
    J Prosthet Dent; 2013 Nov; 110(5):420-3. PubMed ID: 23998623
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Influence of abutment tooth geometry on the accuracy of conventional and digital methods of obtaining dental impressions.
    Carbajal Mejía JB; Wakabayashi K; Nakamura T; Yatani H
    J Prosthet Dent; 2017 Sep; 118(3):392-399. PubMed ID: 28222873
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Clinical efficacy of polyvinyl siloxane impression materials using the one-step two-viscosity impression technique.
    Dogan S; Schwedhelm ER; Heindl H; Mancl L; Raigrodski AJ
    J Prosthet Dent; 2015 Aug; 114(2):217-22. PubMed ID: 25976708
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Randomized controlled clinical trial of digital and conventional workflows for the fabrication of zirconia-ceramic fixed partial dentures. Part I: Time efficiency of complete-arch digital scans versus conventional impressions.
    Sailer I; Mühlemann S; Fehmer V; Hämmerle CHF; Benic GI
    J Prosthet Dent; 2019 Jan; 121(1):69-75. PubMed ID: 30017152
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Randomized controlled within-subject evaluation of digital and conventional workflows for the fabrication of lithium disilicate single crowns. Part III: marginal and internal fit.
    Zeltner M; Sailer I; Mühlemann S; Özcan M; Hämmerle CH; Benic GI
    J Prosthet Dent; 2017 Mar; 117(3):354-362. PubMed ID: 27677220
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Dental Students' Perceptions of Digital and Conventional Impression Techniques: A Randomized Controlled Trial.
    Zitzmann NU; Kovaltschuk I; Lenherr P; Dedem P; Joda T
    J Dent Educ; 2017 Oct; 81(10):1227-1232. PubMed ID: 28966188
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Comparison of the marginal fit of lithium disilicate crowns fabricated with CAD/CAM technology by using conventional impressions and two intraoral digital scanners.
    Abdel-Azim T; Rogers K; Elathamna E; Zandinejad A; Metz M; Morton D
    J Prosthet Dent; 2015 Oct; 114(4):554-9. PubMed ID: 26100929
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Randomized controlled within-subject evaluation of digital and conventional workflows for the fabrication of lithium disilicate single crowns. Part I: digital versus conventional unilateral impressions.
    Benic GI; Mühlemann S; Fehmer V; Hämmerle CH; Sailer I
    J Prosthet Dent; 2016 Nov; 116(5):777-782. PubMed ID: 27460321
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Internal fit of pressed and computer-aided design/computer-aided manufacturing ceramic crowns made from digital and conventional impressions.
    Anadioti E; Aquilino SA; Gratton DG; Holloway JA; Denry IL; Thomas GW; Qian F
    J Prosthet Dent; 2015 Apr; 113(4):304-9. PubMed ID: 25488521
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Establishing CAD/CAM in Preclinical Dental Education: Evaluation of a Hands-On Module.
    Schwindling FS; Deisenhofer UK; Porsche M; Rammelsberg P; Kappel S; Stober T
    J Dent Educ; 2015 Oct; 79(10):1215-21. PubMed ID: 26427781
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Digital vs. conventional implant impressions: efficiency outcomes.
    Lee SJ; Gallucci GO
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2013 Jan; 24(1):111-5. PubMed ID: 22353208
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Students' perspectives on the use of digital versus conventional dental impression techniques in orthodontics.
    Schott TC; Arsalan R; Weimer K
    BMC Med Educ; 2019 Mar; 19(1):81. PubMed ID: 30866910
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Effect of a procedural video CD and study guide on the practical fixed prosthodontic performance of Iranian dental students.
    Nikzad S; Azari A; Mahgoli H; Akhoundi N
    J Dent Educ; 2012 Mar; 76(3):354-9. PubMed ID: 22383605
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The dentist will scan you now: The next generation of digital-savvy graduates.
    Cheah C; Lim C; Ma S
    Eur J Dent Educ; 2021 May; 25(2):232-237. PubMed ID: 32815610
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Clinical evaluation of all-ceramic crowns fabricated from intraoral digital impressions based on the principle of active wavefront sampling.
    Syrek A; Reich G; Ranftl D; Klein C; Cerny B; Brodesser J
    J Dent; 2010 Jul; 38(7):553-9. PubMed ID: 20381576
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Dental students' preferences and performance in crown design: conventional wax-added versus CAD.
    Douglas RD; Hopp CD; Augustin MA
    J Dent Educ; 2014 Dec; 78(12):1663-72. PubMed ID: 25480282
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Impact of digital impression techniques on the adaption of ceramic partial crowns in vitro.
    Schaefer O; Decker M; Wittstock F; Kuepper H; Guentsch A
    J Dent; 2014 Jun; 42(6):677-83. PubMed ID: 24508541
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 18.