These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
121 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26961507)
21. A theoretical study on phase-contrast mammography with Thomson-scattering x-ray sources. De Caro L; Giannini C; Bellotti R; Tangaro S Med Phys; 2009 Oct; 36(10):4644-53. PubMed ID: 19928096 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Generation and analysis of clinically relevant breast imaging x-ray spectra. Hernandez AM; Seibert JA; Nosratieh A; Boone JM Med Phys; 2017 Jun; 44(6):2148-2160. PubMed ID: 28303582 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. In vivo measurement of the effective atomic number of breast skin using spectral mammography. Berggren K; Eriksson M; Hall P; Wallis MG; Fredenberg E Phys Med Biol; 2018 Oct; 63(21):215023. PubMed ID: 30375362 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Method of measuring NEQ as a quality control metric for digital mammography. Bloomquist AK; Mainprize JG; Mawdsley GE; Yaffe MJ Med Phys; 2014 Mar; 41(3):031905. PubMed ID: 24593723 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Direct measurement of clinical mammographic x-ray spectra using a CdTe spectrometer. Santos JC; Tomal A; Furquim TA; Fausto AMF; Nogueira MS; Costa PR Med Phys; 2017 Jul; 44(7):3504-3511. PubMed ID: 28429382 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Development of low-dose photon-counting contrast-enhanced tomosynthesis with spectral imaging. Schmitzberger FF; Fallenberg EM; Lawaczeck R; Hemmendorff M; Moa E; Danielsson M; Bick U; Diekmann S; Pöllinger A; Engelken FJ; Diekmann F Radiology; 2011 May; 259(2):558-64. PubMed ID: 21330558 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Maximum intensity breast diffusion MRI for BI-RADS 4 lesions detected on X-ray mammography. Bickelhaupt S; Paech D; Laun FB; Steudle F; Kuder TA; Mlynarska A; Bach M; Lederer W; Teiner S; Schneider S; Ladd ME; Daniel H; Stieber A; Kopp-Schneider A; Delorme S; Schlemmer HP Clin Radiol; 2017 Oct; 72(10):900.e1-900.e8. PubMed ID: 28687167 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Improved visualization of breast cancer features in multifocal carcinoma using phase-contrast and dark-field mammography: an ex vivo study. Grandl S; Scherer K; Sztrókay-Gaul A; Birnbacher L; Willer K; Chabior M; Herzen J; Mayr D; Auweter SD; Pfeiffer F; Bamberg F; Hellerhoff K Eur Radiol; 2015 Dec; 25(12):3659-68. PubMed ID: 25956934 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Prospects for in vivo estimation of photon linear attenuation coefficients using postprocessing dual-energy CT imaging on a commercial scanner: comparison of analytic and polyenergetic statistical reconstruction algorithms. Evans JD; Whiting BR; O'Sullivan JA; Politte DG; Klahr PH; Yu Y; Williamson JF Med Phys; 2013 Dec; 40(12):121914. PubMed ID: 24320525 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Uncertainty estimation and statistical comparative methodology for mammography x-ray energy spectra. Santoro-Fernandes V; Santos JC; Mariano L; Vanin VR; Costa PR Biomed Phys Eng Express; 2020 Apr; 6(3):035018. PubMed ID: 33438663 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Effects on image quality of a 2D antiscatter grid in x-ray digital breast tomosynthesis: Initial experience using the dual modality (x-ray and molecular) breast tomosynthesis scanner. Patel T; Peppard H; Williams MB Med Phys; 2016 Apr; 43(4):1720. PubMed ID: 27036570 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Characterization of the homogeneous tissue mixture approximation in breast imaging dosimetry. Sechopoulos I; Bliznakova K; Qin X; Fei B; Feng SS Med Phys; 2012 Aug; 39(8):5050-9. PubMed ID: 22894430 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. The relationship between the attenuation properties of breast microcalcifications and aluminum. Zanca F; Van Ongeval C; Marshall N; Meylaers T; Michielsen K; Marchal G; Bosmans H Phys Med Biol; 2010 Feb; 55(4):1057-68. PubMed ID: 20090185 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. MDCT of the breast. Perrone A; Lo Mele L; Sassi S; Marini M; Testaverde L; Izzo L; Marini M AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2008 Jun; 190(6):1644-51. PubMed ID: 18492919 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Optimization of spectral shape in digital mammography: dependence on anode material, breast thickness, and lesion type. Fahrig R; Yaffe MJ Med Phys; 1994 Sep; 21(9):1473-81. PubMed ID: 7838059 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Development of contrast digital mammography. Skarpathiotakis M; Yaffe MJ; Bloomquist AK; Rico D; Muller S; Rick A; Jeunehomme F Med Phys; 2002 Oct; 29(10):2419-26. PubMed ID: 12408316 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. The effect of x-ray spectra from molybdenum and tungsten target tubes on image quality in mammography. Haus AG; Metz CE; Chiles JT; Rossmann K Radiology; 1976 Mar; 118(3):705-9. PubMed ID: 1251024 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Characterization of photon-counting multislit breast tomosynthesis. Berggren K; Cederström B; Lundqvist M; Fredenberg E Med Phys; 2018 Feb; 45(2):549-560. PubMed ID: 29159881 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. X-ray absorptiometry of the breast using mammographic exposure factors: application to units featuring automatic beam quality selection. Kotre CJ Br J Radiol; 2010 Jun; 83(990):515-23. PubMed ID: 20505033 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]