These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

115 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26961507)

  • 41. Mammographic x-ray spectra measured by Compton spectroscopy using a high resolution Schottky CdTe detector.
    Maeda K; Matsumoto M
    Igaku Butsuri; 2004; 24(4):131-41. PubMed ID: 15795501
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Comparison of spectra and mean glandular dose (MGD) with tube voltage used in digital mammography for simulated, metrological and clinical cases.
    Barbosa da Silveira Gatto L; Braz D; Pacifico L; Travassos PC; Goncalves Magalhaes LA
    Appl Radiat Isot; 2021 Oct; 176():109862. PubMed ID: 34385091
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Experimental spectral measurements of heavy K-edge filtered beams for x-ray computed mammotomography.
    Crotty DJ; McKinley RL; Tornai MP
    Phys Med Biol; 2007 Feb; 52(3):603-16. PubMed ID: 17228108
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Quantification of enhancement in contrast-enhanced spectral mammography using a custom-made quantifier tool (I-STRIP): A proof-of-concept study.
    Lobbes MBI; Mulder HKP; Rousch M; Backes WH; Wildberger JE; Jeukens CRLPN
    Eur J Radiol; 2018 Sep; 106():114-121. PubMed ID: 30150032
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Compact x-ray sources for mammographic applications: Monte Carlo simulations of image quality.
    Oliva P; Golosio B; Stumbo S; Bravin A; Tomassini P
    Med Phys; 2009 Nov; 36(11):5149-61. PubMed ID: 19994525
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Contrast-enhanced spectral mammography as work-up tool in patients recalled from breast cancer screening has low risks and might hold clinical benefits.
    Houben IPL; Van de Voorde P; Jeukens CRLPN; Wildberger JE; Kooreman LF; Smidt ML; Lobbes MBI
    Eur J Radiol; 2017 Sep; 94():31-37. PubMed ID: 28941757
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Fourier domain image fusion for differential X-ray phase-contrast breast imaging.
    Coello E; Sperl JI; Bequé D; Benz T; Scherer K; Herzen J; Sztrókay-Gaul A; Hellerhoff K; Pfeiffer F; Cozzini C; Grandl S
    Eur J Radiol; 2017 Apr; 89():27-32. PubMed ID: 28267545
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Clinical amplitude/velocity reconstructive imaging (CARI)--a new sonographic method for detecting breast lesions.
    Richter K
    Br J Radiol; 1995 Apr; 68(808):375-84. PubMed ID: 7795973
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Monochromatic mammography using scanning multilayer X-ray mirrors.
    Windt DL
    Rev Sci Instrum; 2018 Aug; 89(8):083702. PubMed ID: 30184654
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Characterization of benign and malignant breast lesions with computed tomography laser mammography (CTLM): initial experience.
    Floery D; Helbich TH; Riedl CC; Jaromi S; Weber M; Leodolter S; Fuchsjaeger MH
    Invest Radiol; 2005 Jun; 40(6):328-35. PubMed ID: 15905718
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Prediction of malignancy by a radiomic signature from contrast agent-free diffusion MRI in suspicious breast lesions found on screening mammography.
    Bickelhaupt S; Paech D; Kickingereder P; Steudle F; Lederer W; Daniel H; Götz M; Gählert N; Tichy D; Wiesenfarth M; Laun FB; Maier-Hein KH; Schlemmer HP; Bonekamp D
    J Magn Reson Imaging; 2017 Aug; 46(2):604-616. PubMed ID: 28152264
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Diagnostic performance of contrast-enhanced dual-energy spectral mammography (CESM): a retrospective study involving 644 breast lesions.
    Travieso-Aja MDM; Maldonado-Saluzzi D; Naranjo-Santana P; Fernández-Ruiz C; Severino-Rondón W; Rodríguez Rodríguez M; Vega Benítez V; Pérez-Luzardo O
    Radiol Med; 2019 Oct; 124(10):1006-1017. PubMed ID: 31250270
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Effect of breast compression on lesion characteristic visibility with diffraction-enhanced imaging.
    Faulconer LS; Parham CA; Connor DM; Kuzmiak C; Koomen M; Lee Y; Cho KR; Rafoth J; Livasy CA; Kim E; Zeng D; Cole E; Zhong Z; Pisano ED
    Acad Radiol; 2010 Apr; 17(4):433-40. PubMed ID: 20036586
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Dedicated Breast Computed Tomography With a Photon-Counting Detector: Initial Results of Clinical In Vivo Imaging.
    Berger N; Marcon M; Saltybaeva N; Kalender WA; Alkadhi H; Frauenfelder T; Boss A
    Invest Radiol; 2019 Jul; 54(7):409-418. PubMed ID: 30829942
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Material separation in x-ray CT with energy resolved photon-counting detectors.
    Wang X; Meier D; Taguchi K; Wagenaar DJ; Patt BE; Frey EC
    Med Phys; 2011 Mar; 38(3):1534-46. PubMed ID: 21520865
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Radiomics Based on Adapted Diffusion Kurtosis Imaging Helps to Clarify Most Mammographic Findings Suspicious for Cancer.
    Bickelhaupt S; Jaeger PF; Laun FB; Lederer W; Daniel H; Kuder TA; Wuesthof L; Paech D; Bonekamp D; Radbruch A; Delorme S; Schlemmer HP; Steudle FH; Maier-Hein KH
    Radiology; 2018 Jun; 287(3):761-770. PubMed ID: 29461172
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. The challenge of imaging dense breast parenchyma: is magnetic resonance mammography the technique of choice? A comparative study with x-ray mammography and whole-breast ultrasound.
    Pediconi F; Catalano C; Roselli A; Dominelli V; Cagioli S; Karatasiou A; Pronio A; Kirchin MA; Passariello R
    Invest Radiol; 2009 Jul; 44(7):412-21. PubMed ID: 19448554
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. One-view breast tomosynthesis versus two-view mammography in the Malmö Breast Tomosynthesis Screening Trial (MBTST): a prospective, population-based, diagnostic accuracy study.
    Zackrisson S; Lång K; Rosso A; Johnson K; Dustler M; Förnvik D; Förnvik H; Sartor H; Timberg P; Tingberg A; Andersson I
    Lancet Oncol; 2018 Nov; 19(11):1493-1503. PubMed ID: 30322817
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. X-ray properties of an anthropomorphic breast phantom for MRI and x-ray imaging.
    Freed M; Badal A; Jennings RJ; de las Heras H; Myers KJ; Badano A
    Phys Med Biol; 2011 Jun; 56(12):3513-33. PubMed ID: 21606556
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Fabrication of microcalcifications for insertion into phantoms used to evaluate x-ray breast imaging systems.
    Ghammraoui B; Zidan A; Alayoubi A; Zidan A; Glick SJ
    Biomed Phys Eng Express; 2021 Aug; 7(5):. PubMed ID: 34375962
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.