These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

257 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26962902)

  • 1. Randomized Trial of Labor Induction in Women 35 Years of Age or Older.
    Walker KF; Bugg GJ; Macpherson M; McCormick C; Grace N; Wildsmith C; Bradshaw L; Smith GC; Thornton JG;
    N Engl J Med; 2016 Mar; 374(9):813-22. PubMed ID: 26962902
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Maternal and neonatal outcomes of elective induction of labor.
    Caughey AB; Sundaram V; Kaimal AJ; Cheng YW; Gienger A; Little SE; Lee JF; Wong L; Shaffer BL; Tran SH; Padula A; McDonald KM; Long EF; Owens DK; Bravata DM
    Evid Rep Technol Assess (Full Rep); 2009 Mar; (176):1-257. PubMed ID: 19408970
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Induction of labour versus expectant management for nulliparous women over 35 years of age: a multi-centre prospective, randomised controlled trial.
    Walker KF; Bugg G; Macpherson M; McCormick C; Wildsmith C; Smith G; Thornton J
    BMC Pregnancy Childbirth; 2012 Dec; 12():145. PubMed ID: 23231750
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Does induction of labor at term increase the risk of cesarean section in advanced maternal age? A systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Fonseca MJ; Santos F; Afreixo V; Silva IS; Almeida MDC
    Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2020 Oct; 253():213-219. PubMed ID: 32889327
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Induction of labour at 41 weeks versus expectant management and induction of labour at 42 weeks (SWEdish Post-term Induction Study, SWEPIS): multicentre, open label, randomised, superiority trial.
    Wennerholm UB; Saltvedt S; Wessberg A; Alkmark M; Bergh C; Wendel SB; Fadl H; Jonsson M; Ladfors L; Sengpiel V; Wesström J; Wennergren G; Wikström AK; Elden H; Stephansson O; Hagberg H
    BMJ; 2019 Nov; 367():l6131. PubMed ID: 31748223
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Labor Induction versus Expectant Management in Low-Risk Nulliparous Women.
    Grobman WA; Rice MM; Reddy UM; Tita ATN; Silver RM; Mallett G; Hill K; Thom EA; El-Sayed YY; Perez-Delboy A; Rouse DJ; Saade GR; Boggess KA; Chauhan SP; Iams JD; Chien EK; Casey BM; Gibbs RS; Srinivas SK; Swamy GK; Simhan HN; Macones GA;
    N Engl J Med; 2018 Aug; 379(6):513-523. PubMed ID: 30089070
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Outcomes among Nulliparous Women Undergoing Nonmedically Indicated Induction of Labor at 39 Weeks Compared with Expectant Management Differ by Maternal Age.
    Hersh AR; Urbanowicz E; Garg B; Schmidt EM; Packer CH; Caughey AB
    Am J Perinatol; 2024 May; 41(S 01):e1061-e1068. PubMed ID: 36452970
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Maternal and newborn outcomes with elective induction of labor at term.
    Souter V; Painter I; Sitcov K; Caughey AB
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2019 Mar; 220(3):273.e1-273.e11. PubMed ID: 30716284
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. [INDUCTION OF LABOR AT 39 WEEKS OF GESTATION VERSUS EXPECTANT MANAGEMENT].
    Sgayer I; Frank Wolf M
    Harefuah; 2019 Dec; 158(12):802-806. PubMed ID: 31823535
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Nonmedically indicated induction in morbidly obese women is not associated with an increased risk of cesarean delivery.
    Kawakita T; Iqbal SN; Huang CC; Reddy UM
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2017 Oct; 217(4):451.e1-451.e8. PubMed ID: 28578171
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Elective induction of labor at 39 weeks compared with expectant management: a meta-analysis of cohort studies.
    Grobman WA; Caughey AB
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2019 Oct; 221(4):304-310. PubMed ID: 30817905
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Induction of labor versus expectant management among women with macrosomic neonates: a retrospective study.
    Vitner D; Bleicher I; Kadour-Peero E; Borenstein-Levin L; Kugelman A; Sagi S; Gonen R
    J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med; 2020 Jun; 33(11):1831-1839. PubMed ID: 30269627
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Labor induction at 41
    Place K; Rahkonen L; Tekay A; Väyrynen K; Orden MR; Vääräsmäki M; Uotila J; Tihtonen K; Rinne K; Mäkikallio K; Heinonen S; Kruit H
    Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2024 Mar; 103(3):505-511. PubMed ID: 38112629
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Induction of labor at 39 weeks of gestation versus expectant management for low-risk nulliparous women: a cost-effectiveness analysis.
    Hersh AR; Skeith AE; Sargent JA; Caughey AB
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2019 Jun; 220(6):590.e1-590.e10. PubMed ID: 30768934
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Induction of labor compared to expectant management in term nulliparas with a latent phase of labor of more than 8 hours: a randomized trial.
    Sargunam PN; Bak LLM; Tan PC; Vallikkannu N; Noor Azmi MA; Zaidi SN; Win ST; Omar SZ
    BMC Pregnancy Childbirth; 2019 Dec; 19(1):493. PubMed ID: 31829138
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. [To the question of elective induction of labor at 39 weeks of gestation, the answer lies in the question].
    Rozenberg P
    Gynecol Obstet Fertil Senol; 2018 May; 46(5):481-488. PubMed ID: 29656952
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Full-term induction of labor vs expectant management and cesarean delivery in women with obesity: systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Krogh LQ; Glavind J; Henriksen TB; Thornton J; Fuglsang J; Boie S
    Am J Obstet Gynecol MFM; 2023 May; 5(5):100909. PubMed ID: 36842468
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Planned early birth versus expectant management for women with preterm prelabour rupture of membranes prior to 37 weeks' gestation for improving pregnancy outcome.
    Bond DM; Middleton P; Levett KM; van der Ham DP; Crowther CA; Buchanan SL; Morris J
    Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2017 Mar; 3(3):CD004735. PubMed ID: 28257562
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Outcomes of Term Induction in Trial of Labor After Cesarean Delivery: Analysis of a Modern Obstetric Cohort.
    Lappen JR; Hackney DN; Bailit JL
    Obstet Gynecol; 2015 Jul; 126(1):115-23. PubMed ID: 26241264
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Cesarean delivery or induction of labor in pre-labor twin gestations: a secondary analysis of the twin birth study.
    Dougan C; Gotha L; Melamed N; Aviram A; Asztalos EV; Anabusi S; Willan AR; Barrett J; Mei-Dan E
    BMC Pregnancy Childbirth; 2020 Nov; 20(1):702. PubMed ID: 33203367
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 13.