BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

511 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26963131)

  • 1. Evidence-based guidelines for recommending cochlear implantation for postlingually deafened adults.
    Leigh JR; Moran M; Hollow R; Dowell RC
    Int J Audiol; 2016; 55 Suppl 2():S3-8. PubMed ID: 26963131
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Evidence-based guidelines for recommending cochlear implantation for young children: Audiological criteria and optimizing age at implantation.
    Leigh JR; Dettman SJ; Dowell RC
    Int J Audiol; 2016; 55 Suppl 2():S9-S18. PubMed ID: 27142630
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A practical guide to cochlear implantation in adults with long durations of monaural sound deprivation.
    Boisvert I; McMahon CM; Dowell RC
    Int J Audiol; 2016; 55 Suppl 2():S19-23. PubMed ID: 27146278
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Receptive language as a predictor of cochlear implant outcome for prelingually deaf adults.
    Rousset A; Dowell R; Leigh J
    Int J Audiol; 2016; 55 Suppl 2():S24-30. PubMed ID: 27160793
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Referral rates of postlingually deafened adult hearing aid users for a cochlear implant candidacy assessment.
    Looi V; Bluett C; Boisvert I
    Int J Audiol; 2017 Dec; 56(12):919-925. PubMed ID: 28678547
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Fitting prelingually deafened adult cochlear implant users based on electrode discrimination performance.
    Debruyne JA; Francart T; Janssen AM; Douma K; Brokx JP
    Int J Audiol; 2017 Mar; 56(3):174-185. PubMed ID: 27758152
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The case for earlier cochlear implantation in postlingually deaf adults.
    Dowell RC
    Int J Audiol; 2016; 55 Suppl 2():S51-6. PubMed ID: 26918896
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Music appreciation and music listening in prelingual and postlingually deaf adult cochlear implant recipients.
    Moran M; Rousset A; Looi V
    Int J Audiol; 2016; 55 Suppl 2():S57-63. PubMed ID: 27045837
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Intelligibility of the Patient's Speech Predicts the Likelihood of Cochlear Implant Success in Prelingually Deaf Adults.
    van Dijkhuizen JN; Boermans PP; Briaire JJ; Frijns JH
    Ear Hear; 2016; 37(5):e302-10. PubMed ID: 26928004
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Developing an assessment approach for perceptual changes to tinnitus sound characteristics for adult cochlear implant recipients.
    Greenberg D; Meerton L; Graham J; Vickers D
    Int J Audiol; 2015 Jul; 55(7):392-404. PubMed ID: 27146518
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. European multi-centre study of the Nucleus Hybrid L24 cochlear implant.
    Lenarz T; James C; Cuda D; Fitzgerald O'Connor A; Frachet B; Frijns JH; Klenzner T; Laszig R; Manrique M; Marx M; Merkus P; Mylanus EA; Offeciers E; Pesch J; Ramos-Macias A; Robier A; Sterkers O; Uziel A
    Int J Audiol; 2013 Dec; 52(12):838-48. PubMed ID: 23992489
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Speech recognition outcomes following bilateral cochlear implantation in adults aged over 50 years old.
    Boisvert I; McMahon CM; Dowell RC
    Int J Audiol; 2016; 55 Suppl 2():S39-44. PubMed ID: 27049835
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Speech intelligibility as a predictor of cochlear implant outcome in prelingually deafened adults.
    van Dijkhuizen JN; Beers M; Boermans PP; Briaire JJ; Frijns JH
    Ear Hear; 2011; 32(4):445-58. PubMed ID: 21258238
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Fitting recommendations and clinical benefit associated with use of the NAL-NL2 hearing-aid prescription in Nucleus cochlear implant recipients.
    English R; Plant K; Maciejczyk M; Cowan R
    Int J Audiol; 2016; 55 Suppl 2():S45-50. PubMed ID: 26853233
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Criteria of candidacy for unilateral cochlear implantation in postlingually deafened adults I: theory and measures of effectiveness.
    UK Cochlear Implant Study Group
    Ear Hear; 2004 Aug; 25(4):310-35. PubMed ID: 15292774
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Clinical outcomes with the Kanso™ off-the-ear cochlear implant sound processor.
    Mauger SJ; Jones M; Nel E; Del Dot J
    Int J Audiol; 2017 Apr; 56(4):267-276. PubMed ID: 28067077
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Cortical reorganization in postlingually deaf cochlear implant users: Intra-modal and cross-modal considerations.
    Stropahl M; Chen LC; Debener S
    Hear Res; 2017 Jan; 343():128-137. PubMed ID: 27473503
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Utility of bilateral acoustic hearing in combination with electrical stimulation provided by the cochlear implant.
    Plant K; Babic L
    Int J Audiol; 2016; 55 Suppl 2():S31-8. PubMed ID: 26987051
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Speech intelligibility and subjective benefit in single-sided deaf adults after cochlear implantation.
    Finke M; Strauß-Schier A; Kludt E; Büchner A; Illg A
    Hear Res; 2017 May; 348():112-119. PubMed ID: 28286233
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Bimodal benefits in Mandarin-speaking cochlear implant users with contralateral residual acoustic hearing.
    Yang HI; Zeng FG
    Int J Audiol; 2017; 56(sup2):S17-S22. PubMed ID: 28485635
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 26.