515 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26963131)
21. Postlingually deaf adults of all ages derive equal benefits from unilateral multichannel cochlear implant.
Park E; Shipp DB; Chen JM; Nedzelski JM; Lin VY
J Am Acad Audiol; 2011; 22(10):637-43. PubMed ID: 22212763
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Performance Plateau in Prelingually and Postlingually Deafened Adult Cochlear Implant Recipients.
Cusumano C; Friedmann DR; Fang Y; Wang B; Roland JT; Waltzman SB
Otol Neurotol; 2017 Mar; 38(3):334-338. PubMed ID: 28166183
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Lexical tone recognition in noise in normal-hearing children and prelingually deafened children with cochlear implants.
Mao Y; Xu L
Int J Audiol; 2017; 56(sup2):S23-S30. PubMed ID: 27564095
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Cochlear Implantation in Adults With Asymmetric Hearing Loss: Speech Recognition in Quiet and in Noise, and Health Related Quality of Life.
Sladen DP; Carlson ML; Dowling BP; Olund AP; DeJong MD; Breneman A; Hollander S; Beatty CW; Neff BA; Driscoll CL
Otol Neurotol; 2018 Jun; 39(5):576-581. PubMed ID: 29683995
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Cochlear implant effectiveness in postlingual single-sided deaf individuals: what's the point?
Finke M; Bönitz H; Lyxell B; Illg A
Int J Audiol; 2017 Jun; 56(6):417-423. PubMed ID: 28635507
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. When singing with cochlear implants, are two ears worse than one for perilingually/postlingually deaf individuals?
Aronoff JM; Kirchner A; Abbs E; Harmon B
J Acoust Soc Am; 2018 Jun; 143(6):EL503. PubMed ID: 29960471
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Speech rate, rate-matching, and intelligibility in early-implanted cochlear implant users.
Freeman V; Pisoni DB
J Acoust Soc Am; 2017 Aug; 142(2):1043. PubMed ID: 28863583
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Cochlear implantation in late-implanted prelingually deafened adults: changes in quality of life.
Straatman LV; Huinck WJ; Langereis MC; Snik AF; Mulder JJ
Otol Neurotol; 2014 Feb; 35(2):253-9. PubMed ID: 24448285
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Criteria of candidacy for unilateral cochlear implantation in postlingually deafened adults III: prospective evaluation of an actuarial approach to defining a criterion.
UK Cochlear Implant Study Group
Ear Hear; 2004 Aug; 25(4):361-74. PubMed ID: 15292776
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Speech Recognition Outcomes After Cochlear Reimplantation Surgery.
Reis M; Boisvert I; Looi V; da Cruz M
Trends Hear; 2017; 21():2331216517706398. PubMed ID: 28752810
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Predicting sequential bilateral cochlear implantation performance in postlingually deafened adults; A retrospective cohort study.
Smulders YE; Hendriks T; Stegeman I; Eikelboom RH; Sucher C; Upson G; Chester Browne R; Jayakody D; Santa Maria PL; Atlas MD; Friedland PL
Clin Otolaryngol; 2018 Dec; 43(6):1500-1507. PubMed ID: 30022607
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Acoustic, aerodynamic, and perceptual analyses of the voice of cochlear-implanted children.
Guerrero Lopez HA; Mondain M; Amy de la Bretèque B; Serrafero P; Trottier C; Barkat-Defradas M
J Voice; 2013 Jul; 27(4):523.e1-17. PubMed ID: 23809572
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Speech perception performance as a function of age at implantation among postlingually deaf adult cochlear implant recipients.
Mahmoud AF; Ruckenstein MJ
Otol Neurotol; 2014 Dec; 35(10):e286-91. PubMed ID: 25226375
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Cochlear implantation outcome in prelingually deafened young adults. A speech perception study.
Santarelli R; De Filippi R; Genovese E; Arslan E
Audiol Neurootol; 2008; 13(4):257-65. PubMed ID: 18259078
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Brief Assessment of Parental Perception (BAPP): Development and validation of a new measure for assessing paediatric outcomes after bilateral cochlear implantation.
Samuel V; Gamble C; Cullington H; Bathgate F; Bennett E; Coop N; Cropper J; Emond A; Kentish R; Edwards L
Int J Audiol; 2016 Nov; 55(11):699-705. PubMed ID: 27434545
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Cochlear implantation in early deafened, late implanted adults: Do they benefit?
Kumar RS; Mawman D; Sankaran D; Melling C; O'Driscoll M; Freeman SM; Lloyd SK
Cochlear Implants Int; 2016 Apr; 17 Suppl 1():22-5. PubMed ID: 27099106
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Evidence-Based Inclusion Criteria for Cochlear Implantation in Patients With Postlingual Deafness.
Snel-Bongers J; Netten AP; Boermans PBM; Rotteveel LJC; Briaire JJ; Frijns JHM
Ear Hear; 2018; 39(5):1008-1014. PubMed ID: 29642089
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. The use of cochlear's SCAN and wireless microphones to improve speech understanding in noise with the Nucleus6® CP900 processor.
De Ceulaer G; Pascoal D; Vanpoucke F; Govaerts PJ
Int J Audiol; 2017 Nov; 56(11):837-843. PubMed ID: 28695749
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. [Cochlear implant for non-deaf patients?].
Müller-Deile J; Rudert H; Brademann G; Frese K
Laryngorhinootologie; 1998 Mar; 77(3):136-43. PubMed ID: 9577819
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Objective assessment of electrode discrimination with the auditory change complex in adult cochlear implant users.
Mathew R; Undurraga J; Li G; Meerton L; Boyle P; Shaida A; Selvadurai D; Jiang D; Vickers D
Hear Res; 2017 Oct; 354():86-101. PubMed ID: 28826636
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
