511 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26963131)
41. Effects of loss of residual hearing on speech performance with the CI422 and the Hybrid-L electrode.
Friedmann DR; Peng R; Fang Y; McMenomey SO; Roland JT; Waltzman SB
Cochlear Implants Int; 2015 Sep; 16(5):277-84. PubMed ID: 25912363
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
42. [Coping strategies in postlingually deafened adult cochlear implant users in comparison to the hearing population].
Kobosko J; Pankowska A; Skarżyński H
Otolaryngol Pol; 2012; 66(2):132-7. PubMed ID: 22500504
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
43. Exploring the factors influencing discontinued hearing aid use in patients with unilateral cochlear implants.
Fitzpatrick EM; Leblanc S
Trends Amplif; 2010 Dec; 14(4):199-210. PubMed ID: 21406420
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
44. Current Focusing to Reduce Channel Interaction for Distant Electrodes in Cochlear Implant Programs.
DeVries L; Arenberg JG
Trends Hear; 2018; 22():2331216518813811. PubMed ID: 30488764
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
45. Clinical outcomes for adult cochlear implant recipients experiencing loss of usable acoustic hearing in the implanted ear.
Plant KL; van Hoesel RJ; McDermott HJ; Dawson PW; Cowan RS
Ear Hear; 2015; 36(3):338-56. PubMed ID: 25474417
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
46. Subjective and objective results after bilateral cochlear implantation in adults.
Laske RD; Veraguth D; Dillier N; Binkert A; Holzmann D; Huber AM
Otol Neurotol; 2009 Apr; 30(3):313-8. PubMed ID: 19318885
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
47. Effect of gender on the hearing performance of adult cochlear implant patients.
Lenarz M; Sönmez H; Joseph G; Büchner A; Lenarz T
Laryngoscope; 2012 May; 122(5):1126-9. PubMed ID: 22374914
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
48. Musical background not associated with self-perceived hearing performance or speech perception in postlingual cochlear-implant users.
Fuller C; Free R; Maat B; Başkent D
J Acoust Soc Am; 2012 Aug; 132(2):1009-16. PubMed ID: 22894221
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
49. Importance of age and postimplantation experience on speech perception measures in children with sequential bilateral cochlear implants.
Peters BR; Litovsky R; Parkinson A; Lake J
Otol Neurotol; 2007 Aug; 28(5):649-57. PubMed ID: 17712290
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
50. Does quality of life depend on speech recognition performance for adult cochlear implant users?
Capretta NR; Moberly AC
Laryngoscope; 2016 Mar; 126(3):699-706. PubMed ID: 26256441
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
51. ACEMg-mediated hearing preservation in cochlear implant patients receiving different electrode lengths (PROHEARING): study protocol for a randomized controlled trial.
Scheper V; Leifholz M; von der Leyen H; Keller M; Denkena U; Koch A; Karch A; Miller J; Lenarz T
Trials; 2016 Aug; 17():394. PubMed ID: 27502589
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
52. Plasticity in bilateral superior temporal cortex: Effects of deafness and cochlear implantation on auditory and visual speech processing.
Anderson CA; Lazard DS; Hartley DE
Hear Res; 2017 Jan; 343():138-149. PubMed ID: 27473501
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
53. The Acoustic Characteristics of the Voice in Cochlear-Implanted Children: A Longitudinal Study.
Wang Y; Liang F; Yang J; Zhang X; Liu J; Zheng Y
J Voice; 2017 Nov; 31(6):773.e21-773.e26. PubMed ID: 28623039
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
54. The effect of side of implantation on unilateral cochlear implant performance in patients with prelingual and postlingual sensorineural hearing loss: A systematic review.
Kraaijenga VJC; Derksen TC; Stegeman I; Smit AL
Clin Otolaryngol; 2018 Apr; 43(2):440-449. PubMed ID: 28944603
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
55. Predictors of audiological outcome following cochlear implantation in adults.
Green KM; Bhatt Y; Mawman DJ; O'Driscoll MP; Saeed SR; Ramsden RT; Green MW
Cochlear Implants Int; 2007 Mar; 8(1):1-11. PubMed ID: 17479968
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
56. Spatial hearing in a child with auditory neuropathy spectrum disorder and bilateral cochlear implants.
Johnstone PM; Yeager KR; Noss E
Int J Audiol; 2013 Jun; 52(6):400-8. PubMed ID: 23586418
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
57. A predictive model of cochlear implant performance in postlingually deafened adults.
Roditi RE; Poissant SF; Bero EM; Lee DJ
Otol Neurotol; 2009 Jun; 30(4):449-54. PubMed ID: 19415041
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
58. Comparison of Bilateral and Unilateral Cochlear Implantation in Adults: A Randomized Clinical Trial.
Smulders YE; van Zon A; Stegeman I; Rinia AB; Van Zanten GA; Stokroos RJ; Hendrice N; Free RH; Maat B; Frijns JH; Briaire JJ; Mylanus EA; Huinck WJ; Smit AL; Topsakal V; Tange RA; Grolman W
JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 2016 Mar; 142(3):249-56. PubMed ID: 26796630
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
59. Central effects of residual hearing: implications for choice of ear for cochlear implantation.
Francis HW; Yeagle JD; Brightwell T; Venick H
Laryngoscope; 2004 Oct; 114(10):1747-52. PubMed ID: 15454765
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
60. Cochlear implantation with the nucleus slim straight electrode in subjects with residual low-frequency hearing.
Skarzynski H; Lorens A; Matusiak M; Porowski M; Skarzynski PH; James CJ
Ear Hear; 2014; 35(2):e33-43. PubMed ID: 24556970
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
