156 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26963295)
1. The Vision for Preparing the Next Generation of Reviewers for the Scholarly Scientific Publication Process.
Habal MB
J Craniofac Surg; 2016 Mar; 27(2):275-6. PubMed ID: 26963295
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Don't be rejected, how can we help authors, reviewers and editors?: Report of a Symposium for Editors Publishers and Others with an Interest in Scientific Publication, Held in Boston on Wednesday, 11 March 2015, during the Annual Meeting of the International Association for Dental Research.
Eaton KA; Innes N; Balaji SM; Pugh C; Honkala E; Lynch CD
J Dent; 2017 Feb; 57():77-85. PubMed ID: 27894948
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The new era of scientific information systems change; or just a natural evolution in the works.
Habal MB
J Craniofac Surg; 2013 Nov; 24(6):1869-70. PubMed ID: 24220364
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Iovs 2008-2012.
Kaufman PL
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2012 Dec; 53(13):8238-9. PubMed ID: 23230304
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Craniofacial surgery: the first 25 years. Where do we come from? Who are we? Where are we going?
Cohen M
J Craniofac Surg; 2014 Jan; 25(1):14-6. PubMed ID: 24406550
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. If we knew then what we know now: what would have been the progress in craniofacial surgery..
Habal MB
J Craniofac Surg; 2014 Jan; 25(1):1-2. PubMed ID: 24406547
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Implementing a "publish, then review" model of publishing.
Eisen MB; Akhmanova A; Behrens TE; Harper DM; Weigel D; Zaidi M
Elife; 2020 Dec; 9():. PubMed ID: 33258772
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Rewarding reviewers, tracking our authors and selective electronic publication.
Harris JP
ANZ J Surg; 2017 Apr; 87(4):217-218. PubMed ID: 28371034
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Scholarly publication practices of Doctor of Nursing Practice-prepared nurses.
Broome ME; Riner ME; Allam ES
J Nurs Educ; 2013 Aug; 52(8):429-34. PubMed ID: 23855342
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. How a torrent of COVID science changed research publishing - in seven charts.
Else H
Nature; 2020 Dec; 588(7839):553. PubMed ID: 33328621
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Publishing in 2@84.
Lanzillotta M; Crotti C; Da Silva Domingues VM; Lauper K; Burmester GR
Ann Rheum Dis; 2021 Jan; 80(1):11-13. PubMed ID: 33177103
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Reviewers peering from under a pile of 'omics' data.
Nicholson JK
Nature; 2006 Apr; 440(7087):992. PubMed ID: 16625173
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Traditional publications: an endangered species?
Marcus A
Arthritis Rheum; 2008 Feb; 58(2 Suppl):S149-52. PubMed ID: 18240269
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Publication records versus scientific progress.
The Lancet Neurology
Lancet Neurol; 2020 Feb; 19(2):101. PubMed ID: 31978355
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. How to be a good peer reviewer of scientific manuscripts.
Dhillon P
FEBS J; 2021 May; 288(9):2750-2756. PubMed ID: 33486891
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Assessing the evolution of publications by Brazilian spine surgeons in the last decade.
Falavigna A; Botelho RV; Teles AR; da Silva PG; Defino HL
World Neurosurg; 2013 Nov; 80(5):e73. PubMed ID: 22728665
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. The state of the art in peer review.
Tennant JP
FEMS Microbiol Lett; 2018 Oct; 365(19):. PubMed ID: 30137294
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Publication of negative research findings: pros and cons.
Jerrells TR
Alcohol; 2003 Nov; 31(3):123-4. PubMed ID: 14693260
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Dangers of over-dependence on peer-reviewed publication.
Nature; 1999 Oct; 401(6755):727. PubMed ID: 10548083
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Another year to remember: we are on course and keep on going.
Habal MB
J Craniofac Surg; 2001 Nov; 12(6):517-8. PubMed ID: 11711815
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
