147 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2696333)
1. [A myoelectric prosthesis for the forearm amputee].
Martins FL; Martins LS; Davin P
Acta Med Port; 1989; 2(6):297-301. PubMed ID: 2696333
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Functional comparison of upper extremity amputees using myoelectric and conventional prostheses.
Stein RB; Walley M
Arch Phys Med Rehabil; 1983 Jun; 64(6):243-8. PubMed ID: 6860093
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. [Functional myoelectric prostheses. Acceptance among unilateral below-elbow amputees].
Caine K; Herberts P; Wensby L; Körner L
Lakartidningen; 1980 Feb; 77(9):771-4. PubMed ID: 7374297
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Adaptation of the VA / USMC electric hand to the Liberty Mutual myoelectric Boston elbow for above-elbow amputees.
Leal JM; Williams TW; Malone JM
Bull Prosthet Res; 1981; 10-35():56-60. PubMed ID: 7332835
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. An exploration of grip force regulation with a low-impedance myoelectric prosthesis featuring referred haptic feedback.
Brown JD; Paek A; Syed M; O'Malley MK; Shewokis PA; Contreras-Vidal JL; Davis AJ; Gillespie RB
J Neuroeng Rehabil; 2015 Nov; 12():104. PubMed ID: 26602538
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Pattern-recognition arm prosthesis: a historical perspective-a final report.
Wirta RW; Taylor DR; Finley FR
Bull Prosthet Res; 1978; ():8-35. PubMed ID: 365281
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Rehand: Realistic electric prosthetic hand created with a 3D printer.
Yoshikawa M; Sato R; Higashihara T; Ogasawara T; Kawashima N
Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2015; 2015():2470-3. PubMed ID: 26736794
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Design and fabrication of a passive-function, cylindrical grasp terminal device.
Highsmith MJ; Carey SL; Koelsch KW; Lusk CP; Maitland ME
Prosthet Orthot Int; 2009 Dec; 33(4):391-8. PubMed ID: 19961298
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Transfer of tactile input from an artificial hand to the forearm: experiments in amputees and able-bodied volunteers.
Antfolk C; Cipriani C; Carrozza MC; Balkenius C; Björkman A; Lundborg G; Rosén B; Sebelius F
Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol; 2013 May; 8(3):249-54. PubMed ID: 22928878
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. [Evaluation of residual function of the hand in its defects].
Boldyrev AI; Mendelevich IA; Lepilova OI
Ortop Travmatol Protez; 1989 Jul; (7):34-6. PubMed ID: 2812737
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Assessment of a multigrasp myoelectric control approach for use by transhumeral amputees.
Alshammary NA; Dalley SA; Goldfarb M
Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2012; 2012():968-71. PubMed ID: 23366055
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Evaluation of prosthetic usage in upper limb amputees.
Dudkiewicz I; Gabrielov R; Seiv-Ner I; Zelig G; Heim M
Disabil Rehabil; 2004 Jan; 26(1):60-3. PubMed ID: 14660200
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Myoelectric prosthetic replacement in the upper-extremity amputee.
Dalsey R; Gomez W; Seitz WH; Dick HM; Hutnick G; Akdeniz R
Orthop Rev; 1989 Jun; 18(6):697-702. PubMed ID: 2664671
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Kinematic comparison of myoelectric and body powered prostheses while performing common activities.
Carey SL; Dubey RV; Bauer GS; Highsmith MJ
Prosthet Orthot Int; 2009 Jun; 33(2):179-86. PubMed ID: 19367522
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. A prosthetic harness adaptation.
Dobner DL
Arch Phys Med Rehabil; 1990 May; 71(6):436-8. PubMed ID: 2334292
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Mechanical properties of prosthetic limbs: adapting to the patient.
Klute GK; Kallfelz CF; Czerniecki JM
J Rehabil Res Dev; 2001; 38(3):299-307. PubMed ID: 11440261
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Human mimetic forearm mechanism towards bionic arm.
Seo M; Kim H; Choi Y
IEEE Int Conf Rehabil Robot; 2017 Jul; 2017():1171-1176. PubMed ID: 28813980
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The quest for the bionic arm.
Hutchinson DT
J Am Acad Orthop Surg; 2014 Jun; 22(6):346-51. PubMed ID: 24860130
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Compensatory movements of transradial prosthesis users during common tasks.
Carey SL; Jason Highsmith M; Maitland ME; Dubey RV
Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2008 Nov; 23(9):1128-35. PubMed ID: 18675497
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Recognition of hand movements in a trans-radial amputated subject by sEMG.
Atzori M; Muller H; Baechler M
IEEE Int Conf Rehabil Robot; 2013 Jun; 2013():6650486. PubMed ID: 24187303
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
