These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

124 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26963745)

  • 1. Influence of Metal and Ceramic Abutments on the Stress Distribution Around Narrow Implants: A Photoelastic Stress Analysis.
    Galvão GH; Grossi JA; Zielak JC; Giovanini AF; Furuse AY; Gonzaga CC
    Implant Dent; 2016 Aug; 25(4):499-503. PubMed ID: 26963745
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Comparison of fracture resistance of pressable metal ceramic custom implant abutment with a commercially fabricated CAD/CAM zirconia implant abutment.
    Protopapadaki M; Monaco EA; Kim HI; Davis EL
    J Prosthet Dent; 2013 Nov; 110(5):389-96. PubMed ID: 24011801
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Photoelastic stress analysis of different designs of cement-retained fixed partial dentures on Morse taper oral implants.
    Menani LR; Tiossi R; de Torres ÉM; Ribeiro RF; de Almeida RP
    J Craniofac Surg; 2011 Mar; 22(2):674-8. PubMed ID: 21415635
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Bending moments of zirconia and titanium implant abutments supporting all-ceramic crowns after aging.
    Mühlemann S; Truninger TC; Stawarczyk B; Hämmerle CH; Sailer I
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2014 Jan; 25(1):74-81. PubMed ID: 23735182
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Bending moments and types of failure of zirconia and titanium abutments with internal implant-abutment connections: a laboratory study.
    Leutert CR; Stawarczyk B; Truninger TC; Hämmerle CH; Sailer I
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2012; 27(3):505-12. PubMed ID: 22616042
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Fracture Resistance and Mode of Failure of Ceramic versus Titanium Implant Abutments and Single Implant-Supported Restorations.
    Sghaireen MG
    Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2015 Jun; 17(3):554-61. PubMed ID: 24118925
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Influence of crown-to-implant ratio on stress around single short-wide implants: a photoelastic stress analysis.
    Sotto-Maior BS; Senna PM; da Silva-Neto JP; de Arruda Nóbilo MA; Del Bel Cury AA
    J Prosthodont; 2015 Jan; 24(1):52-6. PubMed ID: 24919655
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Influence of abutment-to-fixture design on reliability and failure mode of all-ceramic crown systems.
    Delben JA; Barão VA; Ferreira MB; da Silva NR; Thompson VP; Assunção WG
    Dent Mater; 2014 Apr; 30(4):408-16. PubMed ID: 24507998
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Stress distribution in implant-supported prosthesis with external and internal implant-abutment connections.
    Coelho Goiato M; Pesqueira AA; Falcón-Antenucci RM; Dos Santos DM; Haddad MF; Bannwart LC; Moreno A
    Acta Odontol Scand; 2013 Mar; 71(2):283-8. PubMed ID: 22486241
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Effect of platform connection and abutment material on stress distribution in single anterior implant-supported restorations: a nonlinear 3-dimensional finite element analysis.
    Carvalho MA; Sotto-Maior BS; Del Bel Cury AA; Pessanha Henriques GE
    J Prosthet Dent; 2014 Nov; 112(5):1096-102. PubMed ID: 24831744
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. CAD/CAM glass ceramics for single-tooth implant crowns: a finite element analysis.
    Akça K; Cavusoglu Y; Sagirkaya E; Aybar B; Cehreli MC
    Implant Dent; 2013 Dec; 22(6):623-6. PubMed ID: 24168898
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Stress distribution around dental implants, generated by six different ceramic materials for unitary restoration: An experimental photoelastic study.
    Abarno S; Gehrke AF; Dedavid BA; Gehrke SA
    Dent Med Probl; 2021; 58(4):453-461. PubMed ID: 34962363
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Mechanical testing of implant-supported anterior crowns with different implant/abutment connections.
    Almeida EO; Freitas AC; Bonfante EA; Marotta L; Silva NR; Coelho PG
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2013; 28(1):103-8. PubMed ID: 23377054
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Implant-abutment connection designs for anterior crowns: reliability and failure modes.
    Machado LS; Bonfante EA; Anchieta RB; Yamaguchi S; Coelho PG
    Implant Dent; 2013 Oct; 22(5):540-5. PubMed ID: 24013394
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Photoelastic stress analysis of external versus internal implant-abutment connections.
    Asvanund P; Morgano SM
    J Prosthet Dent; 2011 Oct; 106(4):266-71. PubMed ID: 21962585
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. A 3-year prospective study of implant-supported, single-tooth restorations of all-ceramic and metal-ceramic materials in patients with tooth agenesis.
    Hosseini M; Worsaae N; Schiødt M; Gotfredsen K
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2013 Oct; 24(10):1078-87. PubMed ID: 22708959
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Experimental research on the relationship between fit accuracy and fracture resistance of zirconia abutments.
    Sui X; Wei H; Wang D; Han Y; Deng J; Wang Y; Wang J; Yang J
    J Dent; 2014 Oct; 42(10):1353-9. PubMed ID: 24561040
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Survival Probability of Narrow and Standard-Diameter Implants with Different Implant-Abutment Connection Designs.
    Freitas GP; Hirata R; Bonfante EA; Tovar N; Coelho PG
    Int J Prosthodont; 2016; 29(2):179-85. PubMed ID: 26929961
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. In vitro study of the influence of the type of connection on the fracture load of zirconia abutments with internal and external implant-abutment connections.
    Sailer I; Sailer T; Stawarczyk B; Jung RE; Hämmerle CH
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2009; 24(5):850-8. PubMed ID: 19865625
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Photoelastic analysis of stresses transmitted by universal cast to long abutment on implant-supported single restorations under static occlusal loads.
    Aguiar FA; Tiossi R; Macedo AP; Mattos Mda G; Ribeiro RF; Rodrigues RC
    J Craniofac Surg; 2012 Nov; 23(7 Suppl 1):2019-23. PubMed ID: 23154374
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.