These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

79 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26963828)

  • 1. Negative Feedback for Small Capacitive Touchscreen Interfaces: A Usability Study for Data Entry Tasks.
    Parikh SP; Esposito JM
    IEEE Trans Haptics; 2012; 5(1):39-47. PubMed ID: 26963828
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Usability study of multiple vibrotactile feedback stimuli in an entire virtual keyboard input.
    Kung CH; Hsieh TC; Smith S
    Appl Ergon; 2021 Jan; 90():103270. PubMed ID: 32920221
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Usability of a touchscreen assessment tool (TATOO) prototype for clinicians and typically developing children.
    Danial-Saad A; Corzani M; Tacconi C; Chiari L
    Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol; 2024 Apr; 19(3):951-961. PubMed ID: 36322675
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Vibrotactile grasping force and hand aperture feedback for myoelectric forearm prosthesis users.
    Witteveen HJ; Rietman HS; Veltink PH
    Prosthet Orthot Int; 2015 Jun; 39(3):204-12. PubMed ID: 24567348
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The significance of a usability evaluation of an emerging laboratory order entry system.
    Peute LW; Jaspers MW
    Int J Med Inform; 2007; 76(2-3):157-68. PubMed ID: 16854617
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Mobile Navigation Using Haptic, Audio, and Visual Direction Cues with a Handheld Test Platform.
    Koslover RL; Gleeson BT; de Bever JT; Provancher WR
    IEEE Trans Haptics; 2012; 5(1):33-8. PubMed ID: 26963827
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Vibrotactile feedback for brain-computer interface operation.
    Cincotti F; Kauhanen L; Aloise F; Palomäki T; Caporusso N; Jylänki P; Mattia D; Babiloni F; Vanacker G; Nuttin M; Marciani MG; Del R Millán J
    Comput Intell Neurosci; 2007; 2007():48937. PubMed ID: 18354734
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Influence of size and location of buttons on the usability of interface on large touch screens.
    Guo J; Cheng R; Zhang W; Xia T
    Ergonomics; 2023 Dec; 66(12):2025-2038. PubMed ID: 36762820
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Expansion of Smartwatch Touch Interface from Touchscreen to Around Device Interface Using Infrared Line Image Sensors.
    Lim SC; Shin J; Kim SC; Park J
    Sensors (Basel); 2015 Jul; 15(7):16642-53. PubMed ID: 26184202
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Impact of button position and touchscreen font size on healthcare device operation by older adults.
    Yeh PC
    Heliyon; 2020 Jun; 6(6):e04147. PubMed ID: 32637675
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A haptic and auditory assistive user interface: helping the blinds on their computer operations.
    Jaijongrak VR; Kumazawa I; Thiemjarus S
    IEEE Int Conf Rehabil Robot; 2011; 2011():5975341. PubMed ID: 22275546
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A usability evaluation of medical software at an expert conference setting.
    Bond RR; Finlay DD; Nugent CD; Moore G; Guldenring D
    Comput Methods Programs Biomed; 2014; 113(1):383-95. PubMed ID: 24210868
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Comparison of visual and vibrotactile feedback methods for seated posture guidance.
    Zheng YJ; Morrell JB
    IEEE Trans Haptics; 2013; 6(1):13-23. PubMed ID: 24808264
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Vibrotactile display coding for a balance prosthesis.
    Kadkade PP; Benda BJ; Schmidt PB; Wall C
    IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng; 2003 Dec; 11(4):392-9. PubMed ID: 14960115
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Future technology on the flight deck: assessing the use of touchscreens in vibration environments.
    Coutts LV; Plant KL; Smith M; Bolton L; Parnell KJ; Arnold J; Stanton NA
    Ergonomics; 2019 Feb; 62(2):286-304. PubMed ID: 30470162
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The use of auditory feedback in the design of touch-input devices.
    Schuck MM
    Appl Ergon; 1994 Feb; 25(1):59-62. PubMed ID: 15676950
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Virtual mobile science learning for blind people.
    Sánchez J; Flores H
    Cyberpsychol Behav; 2008 Jun; 11(3):356-9. PubMed ID: 18537508
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Implicit detection of user handedness in touchscreen devices through interaction analysis.
    Fernández C; Gonzalez-Rodriguez M; Fernandez-Lanvin D; De Andrés J; Labrador M
    PeerJ Comput Sci; 2021; 7():e487. PubMed ID: 33987457
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Transferring brain-computer interfaces beyond the laboratory: successful application control for motor-disabled users.
    Leeb R; Perdikis S; Tonin L; Biasiucci A; Tavella M; Creatura M; Molina A; Al-Khodairy A; Carlson T; Millán JD
    Artif Intell Med; 2013 Oct; 59(2):121-32. PubMed ID: 24119870
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Assistive device with conventional, alternative, and brain-computer interface inputs to enhance interaction with the environment for people with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis: a feasibility and usability study.
    Schettini F; Riccio A; Simione L; Liberati G; Caruso M; Frasca V; Calabrese B; Mecella M; Pizzimenti A; Inghilleri M; Mattia D; Cincotti F
    Arch Phys Med Rehabil; 2015 Mar; 96(3 Suppl):S46-53. PubMed ID: 25721547
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 4.