122 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 269641)
21. Papanicolaou smear screening and cervical cancer. What can you expect?
Stenkvist B; Bergström R; Eklund G; Fox CH
JAMA; 1984 Sep; 252(11):1423-6. PubMed ID: 6471269
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Cytologic screening for cervical cancer in southern Iran.
Behmard S; Taherzadeh D; Gondos B
Acta Cytol; 1977; 21(3):432-4. PubMed ID: 268125
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. [The effectiveness and ultilization of screening cytology for cervical cancer in the Federal Republic of Germany (author's transl)].
Schwartz FW
Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd; 1981 Apr; 41(4):259-62. PubMed ID: 6908873
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. [The significance of organized screening for uterine cervix cancer in Denmark during 1968-1987].
Lynge E; Engholm G; Madsen M
Ugeskr Laeger; 1992 May; 154(19):1330-4. PubMed ID: 1598705
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. The impact of cytological screening on the incidence of invasive cervical cancer.
Helm G; Johnsson JE; Lindberg LG
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 1980; 59(3):271-3. PubMed ID: 7424504
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Effect of population screening for carcinoma of the uterine cervix in Finland.
Hakama M
Maturitas; 1985 May; 7(1):3-10. PubMed ID: 4021826
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Population screening for cervical cancer in the region of Nijmegen, The Netherlands 1976-1985.
van der Graaf Y; Vooijs PG; Zielhuis GA
Gynecol Oncol; 1988 Jul; 30(3):388-97. PubMed ID: 3391422
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. A screening programme for cervical cancer that worked.
Hakama M; Louhivuori K
Cancer Surv; 1988; 7(3):403-16. PubMed ID: 3242792
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Is there a changing epidemiology of premalignant lesions of the cervix? Results of cytologic screening of pregnant women.
Fredricsson B; Nasiell M; Sennerstam R; Wadås AM
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 1977; 56(4):435-9. PubMed ID: 602712
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. [Status of preventive examinations against uterine cervix cancer in Denmark].
Lynge E; Arffmann E; Hansen KC; Henriksen B; Holten IW; Hølund B; Jespersen NB; Lindsø R; Olesen F; Poll P
Ugeskr Laeger; 1992 May; 154(19):1339-42. PubMed ID: 1598707
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Screening for cancer of the uterine cervix in Greenland.
Nielsen NH; Jensen H
APMIS; 1993 Apr; 101(4):290-4. PubMed ID: 8323738
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Incidence trends in invasive uterine cervix cancer and carcinoma in situ in Incheon, South Korea.
Boo YK; Kim WC; Lee HY; Leem JH; Lee MH; Leem JS
Asian Pac J Cancer Prev; 2011; 12(8):1985-8. PubMed ID: 22292638
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Results of cytologic mass screening in the Federal Republic of Germany.
Soost HJ; Bockmühl B; Zock H
Acta Cytol; 1982; 26(4):445-52. PubMed ID: 6957096
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Recent trends in uterine cervix cancer in Slovakia, 1968-1987.
Vlasák V; Plesko I; Dimitrova E; Hudáková G
Neoplasma; 1991; 38(5):533-40. PubMed ID: 1956469
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. The effect of mass screening in Iceland, 1965-74, on the incidence and mortality of cervical carcinoma.
Johannesson G; Geirsson G; Day N
Int J Cancer; 1978 Apr; 21(4):418-25. PubMed ID: 669847
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. [Are analyses of cytological cervix smears from young women more harmful than beneficial?].
Skjeldestad FE; Hagen B; Hagmar B; Iversen OE; Juvkam KH; Steen R; Thoresen S; Hareide B
Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen; 2007 Jun; 127(13):1782-5. PubMed ID: 17599128
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. A cluster randomized, controlled trial of breast and cervix cancer screening in Mumbai, India: methodology and interim results after three rounds of screening.
Mittra I; Mishra GA; Singh S; Aranke S; Notani P; Badwe R; Miller AB; Daniel EE; Gupta S; Uplap P; Thakur MH; Ramani S; Kerkar R; Ganesh B; Shastri SS
Int J Cancer; 2010 Feb; 126(4):976-84. PubMed ID: 19697326
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Effectiveness of an organized cervical cancer screening program in Korea: results from a cohort study.
Jun JK; Choi KS; Jung KW; Lee HY; Gapstur SM; Park EC; Yoo KY
Int J Cancer; 2009 Jan; 124(1):188-93. PubMed ID: 18785204
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. [Reproductive risk factors and uterine cervix cancer in Mexico City].
Lazcano-Ponce EC; Rojas-Martínez R; López-Acuńa MP; López-Carrillo L; Hernández-Avila M
Salud Publica Mex; 1993; 35(1):65-73. PubMed ID: 8470022
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Invasive carcinoma of the uterine cervix following diagnosis and treatment of in situ carcinoma. Record linkage study within a National Cancer Registry.
Pettersson F; Malker B
Radiother Oncol; 1989 Oct; 16(2):115-20. PubMed ID: 2595011
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
