294 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26964707)
1. Adequate sample size for developing prediction models is not simply related to events per variable.
Ogundimu EO; Altman DG; Collins GS
J Clin Epidemiol; 2016 Aug; 76():175-82. PubMed ID: 26964707
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Relaxing the rule of ten events per variable in logistic and Cox regression.
Vittinghoff E; McCulloch CE
Am J Epidemiol; 2007 Mar; 165(6):710-8. PubMed ID: 17182981
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. A simulation study of sample size demonstrated the importance of the number of events per variable to develop prediction models in clustered data.
Wynants L; Bouwmeester W; Moons KG; Moerbeek M; Timmerman D; Van Huffel S; Van Calster B; Vergouwe Y
J Clin Epidemiol; 2015 Dec; 68(12):1406-14. PubMed ID: 25817942
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Sample size for binary logistic prediction models: Beyond events per variable criteria.
van Smeden M; Moons KG; de Groot JA; Collins GS; Altman DG; Eijkemans MJ; Reitsma JB
Stat Methods Med Res; 2019 Aug; 28(8):2455-2474. PubMed ID: 29966490
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. No rationale for 1 variable per 10 events criterion for binary logistic regression analysis.
van Smeden M; de Groot JA; Moons KG; Collins GS; Altman DG; Eijkemans MJ; Reitsma JB
BMC Med Res Methodol; 2016 Nov; 16(1):163. PubMed ID: 27881078
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Performance of logistic regression modeling: beyond the number of events per variable, the role of data structure.
Courvoisier DS; Combescure C; Agoritsas T; Gayet-Ageron A; Perneger TV
J Clin Epidemiol; 2011 Sep; 64(9):993-1000. PubMed ID: 21411281
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Shrinkage methods enhanced the accuracy of parameter estimation using Cox models with small number of events.
Lin IF; Chang WP; Liao YN
J Clin Epidemiol; 2013 Jul; 66(7):743-51. PubMed ID: 23566374
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. A simulation study of the number of events per variable in logistic regression analysis.
Peduzzi P; Concato J; Kemper E; Holford TR; Feinstein AR
J Clin Epidemiol; 1996 Dec; 49(12):1373-9. PubMed ID: 8970487
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Events per variable (EPV) and the relative performance of different strategies for estimating the out-of-sample validity of logistic regression models.
Austin PC; Steyerberg EW
Stat Methods Med Res; 2017 Apr; 26(2):796-808. PubMed ID: 25411322
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The number of primary events per variable affects estimation of the subdistribution hazard competing risks model.
Austin PC; Allignol A; Fine JP
J Clin Epidemiol; 2017 Mar; 83():75-84. PubMed ID: 28088594
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Stepwise selection in small data sets: a simulation study of bias in logistic regression analysis.
Steyerberg EW; Eijkemans MJ; Habbema JD
J Clin Epidemiol; 1999 Oct; 52(10):935-42. PubMed ID: 10513756
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Importance of events per independent variable in proportional hazards regression analysis. II. Accuracy and precision of regression estimates.
Peduzzi P; Concato J; Feinstein AR; Holford TR
J Clin Epidemiol; 1995 Dec; 48(12):1503-10. PubMed ID: 8543964
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Monte Carlo methods in clinical research: applications in multivariable analysis.
Concato J; Feinstein AR
J Investig Med; 1997 Aug; 45(6):394-400. PubMed ID: 9291696
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Sample sizes of prediction model studies in prostate cancer were rarely justified and often insufficient.
Collins SD; Peek N; Riley RD; Martin GP
J Clin Epidemiol; 2021 May; 133():53-60. PubMed ID: 33383128
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Review and evaluation of penalised regression methods for risk prediction in low-dimensional data with few events.
Pavlou M; Ambler G; Seaman S; De Iorio M; Omar RZ
Stat Med; 2016 Mar; 35(7):1159-77. PubMed ID: 26514699
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Comparison of Penalized Cox Regression Methods in Low-Dimensional Data with Few-Events: An Application to Dialysis Patients' Data.
Rafati S; Baneshi MR; Hassani L; Bahrampour A
J Res Health Sci; 2019 Jul; 19(3):e00452. PubMed ID: 31586373
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.
Crider K; Williams J; Qi YP; Gutman J; Yeung L; Mai C; Finkelstain J; Mehta S; Pons-Duran C; Menéndez C; Moraleda C; Rogers L; Daniels K; Green P
Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2022 Feb; 2(2022):. PubMed ID: 36321557
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Prognostic models for identifying risk of poor outcome in people with acute ankle sprains: the SPRAINED development and external validation study.
Keene DJ; Schlüssel MM; Thompson J; Hagan DA; Williams MA; Byrne C; Goodacre S; Cooke M; Gwilym S; Hormbrey P; Bostock J; Haywood K; Wilson D; Collins GS; Lamb SE
Health Technol Assess; 2018 Nov; 22(64):1-112. PubMed ID: 30474592
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. On the uncertainty of individual prediction because of sampling predictors.
Shen C; Li X
Stat Med; 2016 May; 35(12):2016-30. PubMed ID: 26712471
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Poor performance of clinical prediction models: the harm of commonly applied methods.
Steyerberg EW; Uno H; Ioannidis JPA; van Calster B;
J Clin Epidemiol; 2018 Jun; 98():133-143. PubMed ID: 29174118
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
