199 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26965027)
1. Interpreting multisource feedback: online study of consensus and variation among GP appraisers.
Wright C; Campbell J; McGowan L; Roberts MJ; Jelley D; Chatterjee A
Br J Gen Pract; 2016 Apr; 66(645):e277-84. PubMed ID: 26965027
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The implications of enhancing appraisal to meet the requirements of revalidation, as perceived by appraisers: a qualitative study in Scotland.
Wakeling J; Cameron N
Educ Prim Care; 2011 Nov; 22(6):377-85. PubMed ID: 22413658
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Self-other agreement in multisource feedback: the influence of doctor and rater group characteristics.
Roberts MJ; Campbell JL; Richards SH; Wright C
J Contin Educ Health Prof; 2013; 33(1):14-23. PubMed ID: 23512556
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Multisource feedback questionnaires in appraisal and for revalidation: a qualitative study in UK general practice.
Hill JJ; Asprey A; Richards SH; Campbell JL
Br J Gen Pract; 2012 May; 62(598):e314-21. PubMed ID: 22546590
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Multisource feedback in evaluating the performance of doctors: the example of the UK General Medical Council patient and colleague questionnaires.
Wright C; Richards SH; Hill JJ; Roberts MJ; Norman GR; Greco M; Taylor MR; Campbell JL
Acad Med; 2012 Dec; 87(12):1668-78. PubMed ID: 23095930
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Commentary: the role of appraisal and multisource feedback in the UK General Medical Council's new revalidation system.
Rubin P
Acad Med; 2012 Dec; 87(12):1654-6. PubMed ID: 23187912
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Insightful practice: a reliable measure for medical revalidation.
Murphy DJ; Guthrie B; Sullivan FM; Mercer SW; Russell A; Bruce DA
BMJ Qual Saf; 2012 Aug; 21(8):649-56. PubMed ID: 22653078
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Paper trials: a qualitative study exploring the place of portfolios in making revalidation recommendations for Responsible Officers.
Furmedge DS; Griffin A; O'Keeffe C; Verma A; Smith LJ; Gill D
BMC Med Educ; 2016 Feb; 16():66. PubMed ID: 26887892
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. The experience and professional development of medical appraisers.
Locke R; Bell J; Scallan S; Ozguler B; Caesar S
Educ Prim Care; 2018 Nov; 29(6):351-356. PubMed ID: 30246615
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Verifying appraisal evidence using feedback from trained peers: views and experiences of Scottish GP appraisers.
Bowie P; Cameron N; Staples I; McMillan R; McKay J; Lough M
Br J Gen Pract; 2009 Jul; 59(564):484-9. PubMed ID: 19566997
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Verification of 'learning credits' by GP appraisers.
Murie J; Wakeling J
Educ Prim Care; 2011 Nov; 22(6):369-76. PubMed ID: 22413657
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Appraisal of family doctors: an evaluation study.
Lewis M; Elwyn G; Wood F
Br J Gen Pract; 2003 Jun; 53(491):454-60. PubMed ID: 12939890
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Assessing the professional performance of UK doctors: an evaluation of the utility of the General Medical Council patient and colleague questionnaires.
Campbell JL; Richards SH; Dickens A; Greco M; Narayanan A; Brearley S
Qual Saf Health Care; 2008 Jun; 17(3):187-93. PubMed ID: 18519625
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Strengthening medical appraisal: reactions to proposals for a new appraisal system to support revalidation.
Ball K; Lyons N; Conlon M; Critchley R
Educ Prim Care; 2011 Nov; 22(6):409-14. PubMed ID: 22413662
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Impact of revalidation on appraisal in primary care: an initial evaluation of the experience of Welsh GPs.
Williams S; Holmes S; Laugharne K
Educ Prim Care; 2016 Mar; 27(2):121-8. PubMed ID: 27005839
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. GP experiences of partner and external peer appraisal: a qualitative study.
McKinstry B; Peacock H; Shaw J
Br J Gen Pract; 2005 Jul; 55(516):539-43. PubMed ID: 16004740
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Multisource feedback in the assessment of physician competencies.
Lockyer J
J Contin Educ Health Prof; 2003; 23(1):4-12. PubMed ID: 12739254
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The reliability of multisource feedback in competency-based assessment programs: the effects of multiple occasions and assessor groups.
Moonen-van Loon JM; Overeem K; Govaerts MJ; Verhoeven BH; van der Vleuten CP; Driessen EW
Acad Med; 2015 Aug; 90(8):1093-9. PubMed ID: 25993283
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Preliminary codesign and testing of a feedback tool to improve the quality of peer appraiser documentation for medical revalidation.
Murie J; MacWalter G; Bowie P
Educ Prim Care; 2019 Jan; 30(1):22-28. PubMed ID: 30376417
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The peer review pilot project: a potential system to support GP appraisal in NHS Scotland?
Murie J; McCrae J; Bowie P
Educ Prim Care; 2009 Jan; 20(1):34-40. PubMed ID: 19618650
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
