These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

194 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26965027)

  • 1. Interpreting multisource feedback: online study of consensus and variation among GP appraisers.
    Wright C; Campbell J; McGowan L; Roberts MJ; Jelley D; Chatterjee A
    Br J Gen Pract; 2016 Apr; 66(645):e277-84. PubMed ID: 26965027
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The implications of enhancing appraisal to meet the requirements of revalidation, as perceived by appraisers: a qualitative study in Scotland.
    Wakeling J; Cameron N
    Educ Prim Care; 2011 Nov; 22(6):377-85. PubMed ID: 22413658
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Self-other agreement in multisource feedback: the influence of doctor and rater group characteristics.
    Roberts MJ; Campbell JL; Richards SH; Wright C
    J Contin Educ Health Prof; 2013; 33(1):14-23. PubMed ID: 23512556
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Multisource feedback questionnaires in appraisal and for revalidation: a qualitative study in UK general practice.
    Hill JJ; Asprey A; Richards SH; Campbell JL
    Br J Gen Pract; 2012 May; 62(598):e314-21. PubMed ID: 22546590
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Multisource feedback in evaluating the performance of doctors: the example of the UK General Medical Council patient and colleague questionnaires.
    Wright C; Richards SH; Hill JJ; Roberts MJ; Norman GR; Greco M; Taylor MR; Campbell JL
    Acad Med; 2012 Dec; 87(12):1668-78. PubMed ID: 23095930
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Commentary: the role of appraisal and multisource feedback in the UK General Medical Council's new revalidation system.
    Rubin P
    Acad Med; 2012 Dec; 87(12):1654-6. PubMed ID: 23187912
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Insightful practice: a reliable measure for medical revalidation.
    Murphy DJ; Guthrie B; Sullivan FM; Mercer SW; Russell A; Bruce DA
    BMJ Qual Saf; 2012 Aug; 21(8):649-56. PubMed ID: 22653078
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Paper trials: a qualitative study exploring the place of portfolios in making revalidation recommendations for Responsible Officers.
    Furmedge DS; Griffin A; O'Keeffe C; Verma A; Smith LJ; Gill D
    BMC Med Educ; 2016 Feb; 16():66. PubMed ID: 26887892
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The experience and professional development of medical appraisers.
    Locke R; Bell J; Scallan S; Ozguler B; Caesar S
    Educ Prim Care; 2018 Nov; 29(6):351-356. PubMed ID: 30246615
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Verifying appraisal evidence using feedback from trained peers: views and experiences of Scottish GP appraisers.
    Bowie P; Cameron N; Staples I; McMillan R; McKay J; Lough M
    Br J Gen Pract; 2009 Jul; 59(564):484-9. PubMed ID: 19566997
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Verification of 'learning credits' by GP appraisers.
    Murie J; Wakeling J
    Educ Prim Care; 2011 Nov; 22(6):369-76. PubMed ID: 22413657
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Appraisal of family doctors: an evaluation study.
    Lewis M; Elwyn G; Wood F
    Br J Gen Pract; 2003 Jun; 53(491):454-60. PubMed ID: 12939890
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Assessing the professional performance of UK doctors: an evaluation of the utility of the General Medical Council patient and colleague questionnaires.
    Campbell JL; Richards SH; Dickens A; Greco M; Narayanan A; Brearley S
    Qual Saf Health Care; 2008 Jun; 17(3):187-93. PubMed ID: 18519625
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Strengthening medical appraisal: reactions to proposals for a new appraisal system to support revalidation.
    Ball K; Lyons N; Conlon M; Critchley R
    Educ Prim Care; 2011 Nov; 22(6):409-14. PubMed ID: 22413662
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Impact of revalidation on appraisal in primary care: an initial evaluation of the experience of Welsh GPs.
    Williams S; Holmes S; Laugharne K
    Educ Prim Care; 2016 Mar; 27(2):121-8. PubMed ID: 27005839
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. GP experiences of partner and external peer appraisal: a qualitative study.
    McKinstry B; Peacock H; Shaw J
    Br J Gen Pract; 2005 Jul; 55(516):539-43. PubMed ID: 16004740
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Multisource feedback in the assessment of physician competencies.
    Lockyer J
    J Contin Educ Health Prof; 2003; 23(1):4-12. PubMed ID: 12739254
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The reliability of multisource feedback in competency-based assessment programs: the effects of multiple occasions and assessor groups.
    Moonen-van Loon JM; Overeem K; Govaerts MJ; Verhoeven BH; van der Vleuten CP; Driessen EW
    Acad Med; 2015 Aug; 90(8):1093-9. PubMed ID: 25993283
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Preliminary codesign and testing of a feedback tool to improve the quality of peer appraiser documentation for medical revalidation.
    Murie J; MacWalter G; Bowie P
    Educ Prim Care; 2019 Jan; 30(1):22-28. PubMed ID: 30376417
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The peer review pilot project: a potential system to support GP appraisal in NHS Scotland?
    Murie J; McCrae J; Bowie P
    Educ Prim Care; 2009 Jan; 20(1):34-40. PubMed ID: 19618650
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.