These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

194 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26965027)

  • 21. Using emotional intelligence to facilitate strengthened appraiser development.
    Tavabie A; Koczwara A; Patterson F
    Educ Prim Care; 2010 Jan; 21(1):9-19. PubMed ID: 20202316
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Factors associated with variability in the assessment of UK doctors' professionalism: analysis of survey results.
    Campbell JL; Roberts M; Wright C; Hill J; Greco M; Taylor M; Richards S
    BMJ; 2011 Oct; 343():d6212. PubMed ID: 22034193
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. What is a good general practitioner (GP)? The development and evaluation of a multi-source feedback instrument for GP appraisal.
    Shepherd A; Lough M
    Educ Prim Care; 2010 May; 21(3):149-64. PubMed ID: 20515544
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Reflective Practice for Patient Benefit: An Analysis of Doctors' Appraisal Portfolios in Scotland.
    Wakeling J; Holmes S; Boyd A; Tredinnick-Rowe J; Cameron N; Marshall M; Bryce M; Archer J
    J Contin Educ Health Prof; 2019; 39(1):13-20. PubMed ID: 30730475
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. A review of further training for GP appraisers in Scotland.
    Staples I; Wakeling J; Cameron N
    Educ Prim Care; 2010 Jan; 21(1):25-31. PubMed ID: 20202318
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Multisource feedback for radiation oncologists.
    Vinod SK; Lonergan DM
    J Med Imaging Radiat Oncol; 2013 Jun; 57(3):384-9. PubMed ID: 23721151
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Evaluation of physicians' professional performance: an iterative development and validation study of multisource feedback instruments.
    Overeem K; Wollersheim HC; Arah OA; Cruijsberg JK; Grol RP; Lombarts KM
    BMC Health Serv Res; 2012 Mar; 12():80. PubMed ID: 22448816
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. The general practitioner workforce crisis in England: a qualitative study of how appraisal and revalidation are contributing to intentions to leave practice.
    Dale J; Potter R; Owen K; Leach J
    BMC Fam Pract; 2016 Jul; 17():84. PubMed ID: 27439982
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. The benefits of appraisal: a critical (re)view of the literature.
    Scallan S; Locke R; Eksteen D; Caesar S
    Educ Prim Care; 2016 Mar; 27(2):94-7. PubMed ID: 26915657
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. A literature review of multi-source feedback systems within and without health services, leading to 10 tips for their successful design.
    Wood L; Hassell A; Whitehouse A; Bullock A; Wall D
    Med Teach; 2006 Nov; 28(7):e185-91. PubMed ID: 17594544
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. General practitioners, revalidation and appraisal: a cross sectional survey of attitudes, beliefs and concerns in Lincolnshire.
    Middlemass J; Siriwardena AN
    Med Educ; 2003 Sep; 37(9):778-85. PubMed ID: 12950940
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Colleague appraisal of Australian general practitioners in training: an analysis of multisource feedback data.
    Vayro C; Narayanan A; Greco M; Spike N; Hanson J; Mitchell B; Hanson D; Stewart R
    BMC Med Educ; 2022 Jun; 22(1):494. PubMed ID: 35751119
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Factors influencing the effectiveness of multisource feedback in improving the professional practice of medical doctors: a systematic review.
    Ferguson J; Wakeling J; Bowie P
    BMC Med Educ; 2014 Apr; 14():76. PubMed ID: 24725268
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Does appraisal enhance learning, improve practice and encourage continuing professional development? A survey of general practitioners' experiences of appraisal.
    Finlay K; McLaren S
    Qual Prim Care; 2009; 17(6):387-95. PubMed ID: 20051189
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Development and validation of a trustworthy multisource feedback instrument to support nurse appraisals.
    Crossley JG
    J Contin Educ Health Prof; 2015; 35(2):91-8. PubMed ID: 26115108
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Exploring family physicians' reactions to multisource feedback: perceptions of credibility and usefulness.
    Sargeant J; Mann K; Ferrier S
    Med Educ; 2005 May; 39(5):497-504. PubMed ID: 15842684
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Exploring the experiences of general practice nurse peer appraisers.
    Ferguson J; Kennedy S
    Educ Prim Care; 2014 Sep; 25(5):268-75. PubMed ID: 25625834
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Appraisal system for community child health doctors.
    Horn N; Pullan C
    Public Health; 1996 Mar; 110(2):103-5. PubMed ID: 8901252
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. GP appraisal: an evaluation of generational differences on the utility of GP appraisal.
    Hopayian K; Sherifi J
    Educ Prim Care; 2020 Nov; 31(6):371-376. PubMed ID: 32862790
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Factors predicting doctors' reporting of performance change in response to multisource feedback.
    Overeem K; Wollersheimh HC; Arah OA; Cruijsberg JK; Grol RP; Lombarts KM
    BMC Med Educ; 2012 Jul; 12():52. PubMed ID: 22781214
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.