247 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26965519)
1. A model for preemptive maintenance of medical linear accelerators-predictive maintenance.
Able CM; Baydush AH; Nguyen C; Gersh J; Ndlovu A; Rebo I; Booth J; Perez M; Sintay B; Munley MT
Radiat Oncol; 2016 Mar; 11():36. PubMed ID: 26965519
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. A method to reconstruct and apply 3D primary fluence for treatment delivery verification.
Liu S; Mazur TR; Li H; Curcuru A; Green OL; Sun B; Mutic S; Yang D
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2017 Jan; 18(1):128-138. PubMed ID: 28291913
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Evaluation of the Elekta Agility MLC performance using high-resolution log files.
Kabat CN; Defoor DL; Myers P; Kirby N; Rasmussen K; Saenz DL; Mavroidis P; Papanikolaou N; Stathakis S
Med Phys; 2019 Mar; 46(3):1397-1407. PubMed ID: 30702748
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. MLC performance prognosis using a degradation model based on trajectory log data from a daily test.
Calama-Santiago JA; Molina-Lopez MY; Infante-Utrilla MÁ; Lavado-Rodríguez ME
Med Phys; 2022 Dec; 49(12):7384-7403. PubMed ID: 36196523
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. A method for evaluating treatment quality using in vivo EPID dosimetry and statistical process control in radiation therapy.
Fuangrod T; Greer PB; Simpson J; Zwan BJ; Middleton RH
Int J Health Care Qual Assur; 2017 Mar; 30(2):90-102. PubMed ID: 28256929
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. A multi-institutional evaluation of machine performance check system on treatment beam output and symmetry using statistical process control.
Binny D; Aland T; Archibald-Heeren BR; Trapp JV; Kairn T; Crowe SB
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2019 Mar; 20(3):71-80. PubMed ID: 30786139
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. QALOG-Pro: A web-based computer program for machine daily log and quality assurance and quality control data management.
D'Souza H
J Cancer Res Ther; 2018; 14(6):1230-1233. PubMed ID: 30488835
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. An EPID-based system for gantry-resolved MLC quality assurance for VMAT.
Zwan BJ; Barnes MP; Fuangord T; Stanton CJ; O'Connor DJ; Keall PJ; Greer PB
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2016 Sep; 17(5):348-365. PubMed ID: 27685132
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Quality assurance for online adapted treatment plans: benchmarking and delivery monitoring simulation.
Li T; Wu Q; Yang Y; Rodrigues A; Yin FF; Jackie Wu Q
Med Phys; 2015 Jan; 42(1):381-90. PubMed ID: 25563278
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Fast, daily linac verification for segmented IMRT using electronic portal imaging.
Vieira SC; Bolt RA; Dirkx ML; Visser AG; Heijmen BJ
Radiother Oncol; 2006 Jul; 80(1):86-92. PubMed ID: 16854483
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. SU-E-T-205: MLC Predictive Maintenance Using Statistical Process Control Analysis.
Able C; Hampton C; Baydush A; Bright M
Med Phys; 2012 Jun; 39(6Part13):3750. PubMed ID: 28517331
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Automating linear accelerator quality assurance.
Eckhause T; Al-Hallaq H; Ritter T; DeMarco J; Farrey K; Pawlicki T; Kim GY; Popple R; Sharma V; Perez M; Park S; Booth JT; Thorwarth R; Moran JM
Med Phys; 2015 Oct; 42(10):6074-83. PubMed ID: 26429282
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The use of log file analysis within VMAT audits.
McGarry CK; Agnew CE; Hussein M; Tsang Y; Hounsell AR; Clark CH
Br J Radiol; 2016 Jun; 89(1062):20150489. PubMed ID: 27072390
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Evaluation of Elekta Agility multi-leaf collimator performance using statistical process control tools.
Meyers SM; Balderson MJ; Létourneau D
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2019 Jul; 20(7):100-108. PubMed ID: 31199568
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Evaluation of MLC leaf positioning accuracy for static and dynamic IMRT treatments using DAVID in vivo dosimetric system.
Karagoz G; Zorlu F; Yeginer M; Yildiz D; Ozyigit G
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2016 Mar; 17(2):14-23. PubMed ID: 27074451
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Study on the established customized limits for the daily quality assurance procedure.
Jin XL; Song JB; Peng JX; Pan XP; Guo R; Xing XF
J Radiat Res; 2022 Jan; 63(1):128-136. PubMed ID: 34734293
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Phantomless patient-specific TomoTherapy QA via delivery performance monitoring and a secondary Monte Carlo dose calculation.
Handsfield LL; Jones R; Wilson DD; Siebers JV; Read PW; Chen Q
Med Phys; 2014 Oct; 41(10):101703. PubMed ID: 25281942
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Linking log files with dosimetric accuracy--A multi-institutional study on quality assurance of volumetric modulated arc therapy.
Pasler M; Kaas J; Perik T; Geuze J; Dreindl R; Künzler T; Wittkamper F; Georg D
Radiother Oncol; 2015 Dec; 117(3):407-11. PubMed ID: 26631644
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Quantitative Approach to Failure Mode and Effect Analysis for Linear Accelerator Quality Assurance.
O'Daniel JC; Yin FF
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2017 May; 98(1):56-62. PubMed ID: 28587053
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Sensitivity of volumetric modulated arc therapy patient specific QA results to multileaf collimator errors and correlation to dose volume histogram based metrics.
Coleman L; Skourou C
Med Phys; 2013 Nov; 40(11):111715. PubMed ID: 24320423
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
