These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
82 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26965602)
21. Waiting for justice in an era of exonerations. Watson C J Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 2014; 42(4):408-11. PubMed ID: 25492065 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
23. [Application of DNA fingerprint analysis to individual identification]. Kominami R; Naitoh E Tanpakushitsu Kakusan Koso; 1992 Mar; 37(4):764-71. PubMed ID: 1603942 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
24. Cuomo seeks genetic data of offenders. Raab S N Y Times Web; 1992 May; ():27, 34. PubMed ID: 11646946 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
25. Criminal DNA data banks: revolution for law enforcement or threat to individual privacy? Yee YH Am J Crim Law; 1995; 22(2):461-90. PubMed ID: 11655161 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
26. Keeping secrets. Hawkins D US News World Rep; 2002 Dec; 133(21):58-60. PubMed ID: 12503490 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
27. [Genetic research as evidence in the German criminal process after the Criminal Law Statute of March 17, 1997 (Part II)]. Etxeberria Guridi JF Rev Derecho Genoma Hum; 1999; (10):65-90. PubMed ID: 10822641 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
28. The $1000 genome: ethical and legal issues in whole genome sequencing of individuals. Robertson JA Am J Bioeth; 2003; 3(3):W-IF1. PubMed ID: 14735880 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Science, truth, and forensic cultures: the exceptional legal status of DNA evidence. Lynch M Stud Hist Philos Biol Biomed Sci; 2013 Mar; 44(1):60-70. PubMed ID: 23117027 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Juries and crime labs: correcting the weak links in the DNA chain. McDonald R Am J Law Med; 1998; 24(2-3):345-63. PubMed ID: 9702277 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
31. Genetic witness: forensic uses of DNA tests. Nishimi RY; O'Connor KW; Gwin HL; Anderson MA J Int Bioethique; 1991; 2(1):29-32. PubMed ID: 11651050 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Challenges to the admissibility of DNA profiling evidence in criminal trials. Roberts H Aust Fam Physician; 1993 Apr; 22(4):507-11. PubMed ID: 8481114 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. DNA test--a forensic boon. Mohanty NK; Haldar S J Indian Med Assoc; 2006 Feb; 104(2):90-2, 94. PubMed ID: 16856590 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Low copy number DNA: where next? Court DS Med Sci Law; 2010 Apr; 50(2):55-6. PubMed ID: 20593594 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
36. When privacy fails: invoking a property paradigm to mandate the destruction of DNA samples. Harlan LM Duke Law J; 2004 Oct; 53(7):179-219. PubMed ID: 15736315 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
37. [Sacred DNA (2)]. Nau JY Rev Med Suisse; 2009 Jan; 5(185):74. PubMed ID: 19216330 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
38. Silent witness, articulate collective: DNA evidence and the inference of visible traits. M'charek A Bioethics; 2008 Nov; 22(9):519-28. PubMed ID: 18959734 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. DNA profiles, computer searches, and the Fourth Amendment. Kimel CW Duke Law J; 2013; 62(4):933-73. PubMed ID: 23461001 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Whose DNA is it anyway? European court, junk DNA, and the problem with prediction. Sarkar SP; Adshead G J Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 2010; 38(2):247-50. PubMed ID: 20542946 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]