These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

106 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26965606)

  • 1. Whose voice is that?
    Rogers N
    Science; 2016 Mar; 351(6278):1140. PubMed ID: 26965606
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. An Approach to Speaker Identification.
    Hollien H
    J Forensic Sci; 2016 Mar; 61(2):334-344. PubMed ID: 27404606
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Speaker identification in courtroom contexts - Part III: Groups of collaborating listeners compared to forensic voice comparison based on automatic-speaker-recognition technology.
    Bali AS; Basu N; Weber P; Rosas-Aguilar C; Edmond G; Martire KA; Morrison GS
    Forensic Sci Int; 2024 Jul; 360():112048. PubMed ID: 38733653
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Empirical test of the performance of an acoustic-phonetic approach to forensic voice comparison under conditions similar to those of a real case.
    Enzinger E; Morrison GS
    Forensic Sci Int; 2017 Aug; 277():30-40. PubMed ID: 28575731
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. [The sources of identification signs for the forensic medical personality identification from voice and sounding speech].
    Kaganov ASh
    Sud Med Ekspert; 2012; 55(6):20-4. PubMed ID: 23405464
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. [On the use of the spectral speech characteristics for the determination of biometric parameters of the vocal tract in forensic medical identification of the speaker's personality].
    Kaganov ASh
    Sud Med Ekspert; 2014; 57(1):26-9. PubMed ID: 25275181
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. An empirical estimate of the precision of likelihood ratios from a forensic-voice-comparison system.
    Morrison GS; Zhang C; Rose P
    Forensic Sci Int; 2011 May; 208(1-3):59-65. PubMed ID: 21131149
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Distinguishing between forensic science and forensic pseudoscience: testing of validity and reliability, and approaches to forensic voice comparison.
    Morrison GS
    Sci Justice; 2014 May; 54(3):245-56. PubMed ID: 24796954
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Impact of dynamic rate coding aspects of mobile phone networks on forensic voice comparison.
    Alzqhoul EA; Nair BB; Guillemin BJ
    Sci Justice; 2015 Sep; 55(5):363-74. PubMed ID: 26385720
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Developing a multimodal biometric authentication system using soft computing methods.
    Malcangi M
    Methods Mol Biol; 2015; 1260():205-25. PubMed ID: 25502384
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. On using gait in forensic biometrics.
    Bouchrika I; Goffredo M; Carter J; Nixon M
    J Forensic Sci; 2011 Jul; 56(4):882-9. PubMed ID: 21554307
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Forensic Gait Analysis and Recognition: Standards of Evidence Admissibility.
    Macoveciuc I; Rando CJ; Borrion H
    J Forensic Sci; 2019 Sep; 64(5):1294-1303. PubMed ID: 30791120
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. [The use of the functional dynamic complex of verbal skills for the purpose of forensic medical personality identification of the speaker].
    Kaganov ASh
    Sud Med Ekspert; 2013; 56(1):24-6. PubMed ID: 23789408
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Just truth? Carefully applying history, philosophy and sociology of science to the forensic use of CCTV images.
    Edmond G
    Stud Hist Philos Biol Biomed Sci; 2013 Mar; 44(1):80-91. PubMed ID: 23036862
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Influence of velocity on variability in gait kinematics: implications for recognition in forensic science.
    Yang SX; Larsen PK; Alkjaer T; Lynnerup N; Simonsen EB
    J Forensic Sci; 2014 Sep; 59(5):1242-7. PubMed ID: 24684582
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Eye-catching eyebrows: training and evaluating humans for periocular image verification.
    Hollingsworth KP
    J Forensic Sci; 2014 May; 59(3):648-58. PubMed ID: 24313791
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Ear identification: a pilot study.
    Cameriere R; DeAngelis D; Ferrante L
    J Forensic Sci; 2011 Jul; 56(4):1010-4. PubMed ID: 21729082
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Neural mechanisms for voice recognition.
    Andics A; McQueen JM; Petersson KM; Gál V; Rudas G; Vidnyánszky Z
    Neuroimage; 2010 Oct; 52(4):1528-40. PubMed ID: 20553895
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Forensic gait analysis - Morphometric assessment from surveillance footage.
    Seckiner D; Mallett X; Maynard P; Meuwly D; Roux C
    Forensic Sci Int; 2019 Mar; 296():57-66. PubMed ID: 30690252
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Handwriting based writer recognition using implicit shape codebook.
    Bennour A; Djeddi C; Gattal A; Siddiqi I; Mekhaznia T
    Forensic Sci Int; 2019 Aug; 301():91-100. PubMed ID: 31153110
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.