433 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26966043)
1. Diagnostic Value of Guided Biopsies: Fusion and Cognitive-registration Magnetic Resonance Imaging Versus Conventional Ultrasound Biopsy of the Prostate.
Oberlin DT; Casalino DD; Miller FH; Matulewicz RS; Perry KT; Nadler RB; Kundu S; Catalona WJ; Meeks JJ
Urology; 2016 Jun; 92():75-9. PubMed ID: 26966043
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) and MRI-Transrectal Ultrasound Fusion Biopsy for Index Tumor Detection: Correlation with Radical Prostatectomy Specimen.
Radtke JP; Schwab C; Wolf MB; Freitag MT; Alt CD; Kesch C; Popeneciu IV; Huettenbrink C; Gasch C; Klein T; Bonekamp D; Duensing S; Roth W; Schueler S; Stock C; Schlemmer HP; Roethke M; Hohenfellner M; Hadaschik BA
Eur Urol; 2016 Nov; 70(5):846-853. PubMed ID: 26810346
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Do cancer detection rates differ between transperineal and transrectal micro-ultrasound mpMRI-fusion-targeted prostate biopsies? A propensity score-matched study.
Rakauskas A; Peters M; Martel P; van Rossum PSN; La Rosa S; Meuwly JY; Roth B; Valerio M
PLoS One; 2023; 18(1):e0280262. PubMed ID: 36652429
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. 18F-Choline PET/MRI: The Additional Value of PET for MRI-Guided Transrectal Prostate Biopsies.
Piert M; Montgomery J; Kunju LP; Siddiqui J; Rogers V; Rajendiran T; Johnson TD; Shao X; Davenport MS
J Nucl Med; 2016 Jul; 57(7):1065-70. PubMed ID: 26985061
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Prostate cancer detection on transrectal ultrasonography-guided random biopsy despite negative real-time magnetic resonance imaging/ultrasonography fusion-guided targeted biopsy: reasons for targeted biopsy failure.
Cash H; Günzel K; Maxeiner A; Stephan C; Fischer T; Durmus T; Miller K; Asbach P; Haas M; Kempkensteffen C
BJU Int; 2016 Jul; 118(1):35-43. PubMed ID: 26384851
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Prospective study of diagnostic accuracy comparing prostate cancer detection by transrectal ultrasound-guided biopsy versus magnetic resonance (MR) imaging with subsequent MR-guided biopsy in men without previous prostate biopsies.
Pokorny MR; de Rooij M; Duncan E; Schröder FH; Parkinson R; Barentsz JO; Thompson LC
Eur Urol; 2014 Jul; 66(1):22-9. PubMed ID: 24666839
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Not All Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging-targeted Biopsies Are Equal: The Impact of the Type of Approach and Operator Expertise on the Detection of Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer.
Stabile A; Dell'Oglio P; Gandaglia G; Fossati N; Brembilla G; Cristel G; Dehò F; Scattoni V; Maga T; Losa A; Gaboardi F; Cardone G; Esposito A; De Cobelli F; Del Maschio A; Montorsi F; Briganti A
Eur Urol Oncol; 2018 Jun; 1(2):120-128. PubMed ID: 31100235
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Improved detection of anterior fibromuscular stroma and transition zone prostate cancer using biparametric and multiparametric MRI with MRI-targeted biopsy and MRI-US fusion guidance.
Radtke JP; Boxler S; Kuru TH; Wolf MB; Alt CD; Popeneciu IV; Steinemann S; Huettenbrink C; Bergstraesser-Gasch C; Klein T; Kesch C; Roethke M; Becker N; Roth W; Schlemmer HP; Hohenfellner M; Hadaschik BA
Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis; 2015 Sep; 18(3):288-96. PubMed ID: 26078202
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Central zone lesions on magnetic resonance imaging: Should we be concerned?
Tan WP; Mazzone A; Shors S; Antoine N; Ekbal S; Khare N; McKiel C; Pessis D; Deane L
Urol Oncol; 2017 Jan; 35(1):31.e7-31.e12. PubMed ID: 27692837
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. An initial negative round of targeted biopsies in men with highly suspicious multiparametric magnetic resonance findings does not exclude clinically significant prostate cancer-Preliminary experience.
Costa DN; Kay FU; Pedrosa I; Kolski L; Lotan Y; Roehrborn CG; Hornberger B; Xi Y; Francis F; Rofsky NM
Urol Oncol; 2017 Apr; 35(4):149.e15-149.e21. PubMed ID: 27939349
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. [Real-time MRI/US fusion-guided biopsy in biopsy-naïve and pre-biopsied patients with suspicion for prostate cancer].
Maxeiner A; Stephan C; Fischer T; Durmus T; Kilic E; Asbach P; Haas M; Günzel K; Neymeyer J; Miller K; Cash H
Aktuelle Urol; 2015 Jan; 46(1):34-8. PubMed ID: 25519051
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Risk-based Patient Selection for Magnetic Resonance Imaging-targeted Prostate Biopsy after Negative Transrectal Ultrasound-guided Random Biopsy Avoids Unnecessary Magnetic Resonance Imaging Scans.
Alberts AR; Schoots IG; Bokhorst LP; van Leenders GJ; Bangma CH; Roobol MJ
Eur Urol; 2016 Jun; 69(6):1129-34. PubMed ID: 26651990
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Primary magnetic resonance imaging/ultrasonography fusion-guided biopsy of the prostate.
Maxeiner A; Kittner B; Blobel C; Wiemer L; Hofbauer SL; Fischer T; Asbach P; Haas M; Penzkofer T; Fuller F; Miller K; Cash H
BJU Int; 2018 Aug; 122(2):211-218. PubMed ID: 29569320
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Added Value of Multiparametric Ultrasonography in Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Ultrasonography Fusion-guided Biopsy of the Prostate in Patients With Suspicion for Prostate Cancer.
Maxeiner A; Stephan C; Durmus T; Slowinski T; Cash H; Fischer T
Urology; 2015 Jul; 86(1):108-14. PubMed ID: 26142593
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Improved Detection of Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer With Software-assisted Systematic Biopsy Using MR/US Fusion in Patients With Negative Prostate MRI.
Meng Y; Vetter JM; Parker AA; Arett CT; Andriole GL; Shetty AS; Fowler KJ; Kim EH
Urology; 2018 Oct; 120():162-166. PubMed ID: 29958965
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Additive Value of Transrectal Systematic Ventral Biopsies in Combination with Magnet Resonance Imaging/Ultrasound Fusion-Guided Biopsy in Patients with 3 or More Negative Prostate Biopsies.
Maxeiner A; Nest AM; Stephan C; Cash H; Baur ADJ; Fischer T; Kilic E; Piper SK; Nowak CP; Busch J; Miller K; Mang J
Urol Int; 2020; 104(3-4):205-213. PubMed ID: 31801153
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Critical evaluation of magnetic resonance imaging targeted, transrectal ultrasound guided transperineal fusion biopsy for detection of prostate cancer.
Kuru TH; Roethke MC; Seidenader J; Simpfendörfer T; Boxler S; Alammar K; Rieker P; Popeneciu VI; Roth W; Pahernik S; Schlemmer HP; Hohenfellner M; Hadaschik BA
J Urol; 2013 Oct; 190(4):1380-6. PubMed ID: 23608676
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Prostate cancer detection using multiparametric 3 - tesla MRI and fusion biopsy: preliminary results.
Mussi TC; Garcia RG; Queiroz MR; Lemos GC; Baroni RH
Int Braz J Urol; 2016; 42(5):897-905. PubMed ID: 27532112
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Comparison of systematic transrectal biopsy to transperineal magnetic resonance imaging/ultrasound-fusion biopsy for the diagnosis of prostate cancer.
Borkowetz A; Platzek I; Toma M; Laniado M; Baretton G; Froehner M; Koch R; Wirth M; Zastrow S
BJU Int; 2015 Dec; 116(6):873-9. PubMed ID: 25523210
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Defining the learning curve for multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of the prostate using MRI-transrectal ultrasonography (TRUS) fusion-guided transperineal prostate biopsies as a validation tool.
Gaziev G; Wadhwa K; Barrett T; Koo BC; Gallagher FA; Serrao E; Frey J; Seidenader J; Carmona L; Warren A; Gnanapragasam V; Doble A; Kastner C
BJU Int; 2016 Jan; 117(1):80-6. PubMed ID: 25099182
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
