These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

144 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26966098)

  • 21. Open-Source Tools for Dense Facial Tissue Depth Mapping of Computed Tomography Models.
    Simmons-Ehrhardt T; Falsetti C; Falsetti AB; Ehrhardt CJ
    Hum Biol; 2018 Jan; 90(1):63-76. PubMed ID: 30387384
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Computerized reconstruction of fragmentary skeletal remains.
    Mahfouz MR; Mustafa A; Abdel Fatah EE; Herrmann NP; Langley NR
    Forensic Sci Int; 2017 Jun; 275():212-223. PubMed ID: 28411500
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. A geometric-morphometric study of the Cretan humerus for sex identification.
    Kranioti EF; Bastir M; Sánchez-Meseguer A; Rosas A
    Forensic Sci Int; 2009 Aug; 189(1-3):111.e1-8. PubMed ID: 19446415
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Bone comparison identification method based on chest computed tomography imaging.
    Matsunobu Y; Morishita J; Usumoto Y; Okumura M; Ikeda N
    Leg Med (Tokyo); 2017 Nov; 29():1-5. PubMed ID: 28869907
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Bilateral Asymmetry of Nutrient Foramen Position in Forearm Bones: Implications for its Use in Sorting Commingled Remains.
    Vehit U; Christensen AM
    J Forensic Sci; 2019 Jan; 64(1):186-189. PubMed ID: 29975981
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Validation of a computer modelled forensic facial reconstruction technique using CT data from live subjects: a pilot study.
    Short LJ; Khambay B; Ayoub A; Erolin C; Rynn C; Wilkinson C
    Forensic Sci Int; 2014 Apr; 237():147.e1-147.e8. PubMed ID: 24529418
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Forensic personal identification utilizing part-to-part comparison of CT-derived 3D lumbar models.
    Decker SJ; Ford JM
    Forensic Sci Int; 2019 Jan; 294():21-26. PubMed ID: 30445251
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. A novel method of automated skull registration for forensic facial approximation.
    Turner WD; Brown RE; Kelliher TP; Tu PH; Taister MA; Miller KW
    Forensic Sci Int; 2005 Nov; 154(2-3):149-58. PubMed ID: 16140487
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. The prospects for application of computational anatomy in forensic anthropology for sex determination.
    Franchi A; Valette S; Agier R; Prost R; Kéchichan R; Fanton L
    Forensic Sci Int; 2019 Apr; 297():156-160. PubMed ID: 30798101
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Digital pair-matching of iliac bones: pilot study on a three-dimensional approach with models acquired through stereophotogrammetry.
    Palamenghi A; Mazzarelli D; Cappella A; De Angelis D; Sforza C; Cattaneo C; Gibelli D
    Int J Legal Med; 2023 Jan; 137(1):105-113. PubMed ID: 36195690
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Accurate and semi-automated reassociation of intermixed human skeletal remains recovered from bioarchaeological and forensic contexts.
    Anastopoulou I; Karakostis FA; Harvati K; Moraitis K
    Sci Rep; 2021 Oct; 11(1):20273. PubMed ID: 34642444
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. An Analysis on the Choice of Alpha Level in the Osteometric Pair-matching of the Os Coxa, Scapula, and Clavicle.
    Lynch JJ
    J Forensic Sci; 2018 May; 63(3):793-797. PubMed ID: 28718882
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Patella sex determination by 3D statistical shape models and nonlinear classifiers.
    Mahfouz M; Badawi A; Merkl B; Fatah EE; Pritchard E; Kesler K; Moore M; Jantz R; Jantz L
    Forensic Sci Int; 2007 Dec; 173(2-3):161-70. PubMed ID: 17482786
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Virtual taphonomy: A new method integrating excavation and postprocessing in an archaeological context.
    Wilhelmson H; Dell'Unto N
    Am J Phys Anthropol; 2015 Jun; 157(2):305-21. PubMed ID: 25720527
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. [Anthropology in forensic problems].
    Holley S; Lochner S; Graw M
    MMW Fortschr Med; 2011 May; 153(21):43-4. PubMed ID: 21736065
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Osteometric sorting of skeletal elements from a sample of modern Colombians: a pilot study.
    Rodríguez JM; Hackman L; Martínez W; Medina CS
    Int J Legal Med; 2016 Mar; 130(2):541-50. PubMed ID: 25588668
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Virtual forensic anthropology: The accuracy of osteometric analysis of 3D bone models derived from clinical computed tomography (CT) scans.
    Colman KL; de Boer HH; Dobbe JGG; Liberton NPTJ; Stull KE; van Eijnatten M; Streekstra GJ; Oostra RJ; van Rijn RR; van der Merwe AE
    Forensic Sci Int; 2019 Nov; 304():109963. PubMed ID: 31610335
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. The Automation of Regression Modeling in Osteometric Sorting: An Ordination Approach.
    Lynch JJ
    J Forensic Sci; 2018 May; 63(3):798-804. PubMed ID: 28731575
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Digital imaging methods as an aid in dental identification of human remains.
    Bowers CM; Johansen RJ
    J Forensic Sci; 2002 Mar; 47(2):354-9. PubMed ID: 11908607
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. An Automated Two-dimensional Pairwise form Registration Method for Pair-matching of Fragmented Skeletal Remains.
    Lynch JJ
    J Forensic Sci; 2018 Nov; 63(6):1790-1795. PubMed ID: 29637565
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.