BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

351 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26966162)

  • 1. Relationship Between 18F-FDG PET/CT Findings and HER2 Expression in Gastric Cancer.
    Chen R; Zhou X; Liu J; Huang G
    J Nucl Med; 2016 Jul; 57(7):1040-4. PubMed ID: 26966162
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Relationship between PD-L1 expression and
    Chen R; Chen Y; Huang G; Liu J
    Aging (Albany NY); 2019 Dec; 11(24):12270-12277. PubMed ID: 31848322
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Metabolic Signature on 18F-FDG PET/CT, HER2 Status, and Survival in Gastric Adenocarcinomas.
    Celli R; Colunga M; Patel N; Djekidel M; Jain D
    J Nucl Med Technol; 2016 Dec; 44(4):234-238. PubMed ID: 27789750
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The prognostic value of volume-based parameters using
    Park JS; Lee N; Beom SH; Kim HS; Lee CK; Rha SY; Chung HC; Yun M; Cho A; Jung M
    Gastric Cancer; 2018 Mar; 21(2):213-224. PubMed ID: 28643145
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Relationship Between 18F-FDG PET/CT Scans and KRAS Mutations in Metastatic Colorectal Cancer.
    Kawada K; Toda K; Nakamoto Y; Iwamoto M; Hatano E; Chen F; Hasegawa S; Togashi K; Date H; Uemoto S; Sakai Y
    J Nucl Med; 2015 Sep; 56(9):1322-7. PubMed ID: 26135109
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. [Correlations of
    Wang JL; Shi AQ; Fan CC; Wang YZ; Guo GR; Liu JY
    Zhongguo Yi Xue Ke Xue Yuan Xue Bao; 2022 Aug; 44(4):628-635. PubMed ID: 36065696
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Should 18F-FDG PET/CT Be Routinely Performed in the Clinical Staging of Locally Advanced Gastric Adenocarcinoma?
    Perlaza P; Ortín J; Pagès M; Buxó E; Fernández-Esparrach G; Colletti PM; Rubello D; Mayoral M; Sánchez N; Ruiz C; Ginés A; Fuster D
    Clin Nucl Med; 2018 Jun; 43(6):402-410. PubMed ID: 29485442
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. (18)F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography comparison of gastric lymphoma and gastric carcinoma.
    Li XF; Fu Q; Dong YW; Liu JJ; Song XY; Dai D; Zuo C; Xu WG
    World J Gastroenterol; 2016 Sep; 22(34):7787-96. PubMed ID: 27678362
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Significance of CT attenuation and F-18 fluorodeoxyglucose uptake of visceral adipose tissue for predicting survival in gastric cancer patients after curative surgical resection.
    Lee JW; Son MW; Chung IK; Cho YS; Lee MS; Lee SM
    Gastric Cancer; 2020 Mar; 23(2):273-284. PubMed ID: 31485803
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Association between partial-volume corrected SUVmax and Oncotype DX recurrence score in early-stage, ER-positive/HER2-negative invasive breast cancer.
    Lee SH; Ha S; An HJ; Lee JS; Han W; Im SA; Ryu HS; Kim WH; Chang JM; Cho N; Moon WK; Cheon GJ
    Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging; 2016 Aug; 43(9):1574-84. PubMed ID: 27209424
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The Correlation Between
    Zhang LF; Li JL; Wang YH; Tai XH; Liu L; Zhang XX; An YW; Li HL
    Cancer Biother Radiopharm; 2023 Aug; 38(6):364-370. PubMed ID: 34529925
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Prognostic value of SUVmax measured by pretreatment 18F-FDG PET/CT in patients with primary gastric lymphoma.
    Hwang JP; Lim I; Byun BH; Kim BI; Choi CW; Lim SM
    Nucl Med Commun; 2016 Dec; 37(12):1267-1272. PubMed ID: 27482643
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The correlation between molecular pathological profiles and metabolic parameters of
    Song J; Li Z; Chen P; Zhou N; Zhang Y; Yang Z; Wang X
    Abdom Radiol (NY); 2020 Feb; 45(2):312-321. PubMed ID: 31111196
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Prognostic value of (18)F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography in patients with gastric neuroendocrine carcinoma and mixed adenoneuroendocrine carcinoma.
    Lim SM; Kim H; Kang B; Kim HS; Rha SY; Noh SH; Hyung WJ; Cheong JH; Kim HI; Chung HC; Yun M; Cho A; Jung M
    Ann Nucl Med; 2016 May; 30(4):279-86. PubMed ID: 26837515
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The clinical implications of FDG-PET/CT differ according to histology in advanced gastric cancer.
    Chon HJ; Kim C; Cho A; Kim YM; Jang SJ; Kim BO; Park CH; Hyung WJ; Ahn JB; Noh SH; Yun M; Rha SY
    Gastric Cancer; 2019 Jan; 22(1):113-122. PubMed ID: 29948387
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The value of primary tumor (18)F-FDG uptake on preoperative PET/CT for predicting intratumoral lymphatic invasion and axillary nodal metastasis.
    Jung NY; Kim SH; Kang BJ; Park SY; Chung MH
    Breast Cancer; 2016 Sep; 23(5):712-7. PubMed ID: 26219608
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Role of
    Akimoto E; Kadoya T; Kajitani K; Emi A; Shigematsu H; Ohara M; Masumoto N; Okada M
    Clin Breast Cancer; 2018 Feb; 18(1):45-52. PubMed ID: 28993056
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The maximum standardized uptake value of metastatic site in 18 F-FDG PET/CT predicts molecular subtypes and survival in metastatic breast cancer: An Izmir Oncology Group study.
    Cokmert S; Tanriverdi O; Karapolat I; Demir L; Bayoglu V; Can A; Akyol M; Yilmaz Y; Oktay Tarhan M
    J BUON; 2016; 21(6):1410-1418. PubMed ID: 28039701
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Added value of pretreatment (18)F-FDG PET/CT for staging of advanced gastric cancer: Comparison with contrast-enhanced MDCT.
    Kawanaka Y; Kitajima K; Fukushima K; Mouri M; Doi H; Oshima T; Niwa H; Kaibe N; Sasako M; Tomita T; Miwa H; Hirota S
    Eur J Radiol; 2016 May; 85(5):989-95. PubMed ID: 27130061
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Prognostic significance of preoperative
    Higuchi T; Nishimukai A; Ozawa H; Fujimoto Y; Yanai A; Miyagawa Y; Murase K; Imamura M; Takatsuka Y; Kitajima K; Fukushima K; Miyoshi Y
    Breast; 2016 Dec; 30():5-12. PubMed ID: 27569020
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 18.