These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
161 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 269666)
1. A photographic study of the soft-tissue profile of the Negro population. Sushner NI Am J Orthod; 1977 Oct; 72(4):373-85. PubMed ID: 269666 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Esthetic preferences of European American, Hispanic American, Japanese, and African judges for soft-tissue profiles. Nomura M; Motegi E; Hatch JP; Gakunga PT; Ng'ang'a PM; Rugh JD; Yamaguchi H Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2009 Apr; 135(4 Suppl):S87-95. PubMed ID: 19362272 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Soft tissue profile in Anatolian Turkish adults: Part II. Comparison of different soft tissue analyses in the evaluation of beauty. Erbay EF; Caniklioğlu CM Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2002 Jan; 121(1):65-72. PubMed ID: 11786874 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. A cephalometric investigation of horizontal lip position in adult Nigerians. Ikenna Isiekwe G; Olatokunbo DaCosta O; Chukwudi Isiekwe M J Orthod; 2012 Sep; 39(3):160-9. PubMed ID: 22984100 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Soft tissue profile in Anatolian Turkish adults: Part I. Evaluation of horizontal lip position using different soft tissue analyses. Erbay EF; Caniklioğlu CM; Erbay SK Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2002 Jan; 121(1):57-64. PubMed ID: 11786873 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Photos vs silhouettes for evaluation of profile esthetics between white and black evaluators. Pithon MM; Silva IS; Almeida IO; Nery MS; de Souza ML; Barbosa G; Dos Santos AF; da Silva Coqueiro R Angle Orthod; 2014 Mar; 84(2):231-8. PubMed ID: 23957665 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. The reliability of analytical reference lines for determining esthetically pleasing lip position: An assessment of consistency, sensitivity, and specificity. Ng JHH; Singh P; Wang Z; Yang Y; Khambay BS; Gu M Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2023 Jul; 164(1):e14-e26. PubMed ID: 37227323 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Bimaxillary protrusion in black Americans--an esthetic evaluation and the treatment considerations. Farrow AL; Zarrinnia K; Azizi K Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1993 Sep; 104(3):240-50. PubMed ID: 8362785 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Soft-tissue cephalometric norms for the Lambada population in Telangana Region of Andhra Pradesh. Thomas M; Reddy VD; Lakshmi HV Indian J Dent Res; 2012; 23(3):353-8. PubMed ID: 23059572 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Correlations between cephalometric and photographic measurements of facial attractiveness in Chinese and US patients after orthodontic treatment. Oh HS; Korn EL; Zhang X; Liu Y; Xu T; Boyd R; Baumrind S Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2009 Dec; 136(6):762.e1-14; discussion 762-3. PubMed ID: 19962590 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Analysis of the soft tissue profile in Croatians with normal occlusions and well-balanced faces. Anić-Milošević S; Anić-Milošević S; Lapter-Varga M; Dumancic J; Šlaj M Eur J Orthod; 2011 Jun; 33(3):305-10. PubMed ID: 20671069 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. A cephalometric evaluation of American Negro women. Fonseca RJ; Klein WD Am J Orthod; 1978 Feb; 73(2):152-60. PubMed ID: 272851 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The facial soft tissue profile of the southern Chinese: prosthodontic considerations. Chiu CS; Clark RK J Prosthet Dent; 1992 Nov; 68(5):839-50. PubMed ID: 1432812 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Comparison of White and Chinese perception of esthetic Chinese lip position. Chong HT; Thea KW; Descallar J; Chen Y; Dalci O; Wong R; Darendeliler MA Angle Orthod; 2014 Mar; 84(2):246-53. PubMed ID: 23914821 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Soft-tissue profile--fallacies of hard-tissue standards in treatment planning. Park YC; Burstone CJ Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1986 Jul; 90(1):52-62. PubMed ID: 3460347 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Photos vs silhouettes for evaluation of African American profile esthetics. Hockley A; Weinstein M; Borislow AJ; Braitman LE Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2012 Feb; 141(2):161-8. PubMed ID: 22284283 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The perceived impact of extraction and nonextraction treatments on matched samples of African American patients. Scott SH; Johnston LE Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1999 Sep; 116(3):352-60. PubMed ID: 10474110 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. An evaluation of the soft-tissue facial profile in the North American black woman. Thomas RG Am J Orthod; 1979 Jul; 76(1):84-94. PubMed ID: 287386 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. The role of the nose and cranial base in profile assessment: a morphological comparison between native African and Caucasian samples. Dandajena T; Chung KW SADJ; 2012 Aug; 67(7):394-9. PubMed ID: 23951800 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. [The beauty perspective of the horizontal lip position]. Hsu BS; Kuang SH Zhonghua Ya Yi Xue Hui Za Zhi; 1990 Mar; 9(1):12-9. PubMed ID: 2131158 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]