These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
383 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26967078)
1. Assessment of Patient Satisfaction With Evaluation Methods in Open Technique Septorhinoplasty. Başer E; Kocagöz GD; Çalim ÖF; Verim A; Yilmaz F; Özturan O J Craniofac Surg; 2016 Mar; 27(2):420-4. PubMed ID: 26967078 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Improvement in nasal obstruction and quality of life after septorhinoplasty and turbinate surgery. Yamasaki A; Levesque PA; Bleier BS; Busaba NY; Gray ST; Holbrook EH; Sedaghat AR; Lindsay RW Laryngoscope; 2019 Jul; 129(7):1554-1560. PubMed ID: 30810237 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Functional and aesthetic results after septorhinoplasty and concomitant radiofrequency of the inferior turbinate: is there a role for patient reported outcome measures (PROMs)? Parrilla C; Salvati A; Mastrapasqua RF; Artuso A; Paludetti G; Galli J Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol; 2019 Mar; 276(3):745-751. PubMed ID: 30604059 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Outcomes of septorhinoplasty: a new approach comparing functional and aesthetic results. Radulesco T; Penicaud M; Santini L; Thomassin JM; Dessi P; Michel J Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2018 Feb; 47(2):175-179. PubMed ID: 28967532 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The MiRa scale, a new standardised scale for evaluating nasal deformities before and after septorhinoplasty: A prospective study comparing patient satisfaction and the surgeon's assessment. Radulesco T; Penicaud M; Santini L; Thomassin JM; Dessi P; Michel J Clin Otolaryngol; 2017 Dec; 42(6):1350-1357. PubMed ID: 28374943 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Aesthetic and Functional Results of Lateral Crural Repositioning. Ilhan AE; Saribas B; Caypinar B JAMA Facial Plast Surg; 2015; 17(4):286-92. PubMed ID: 26086322 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Assessment of functional and aesthetic outcomes in septorhinoplasty. Simsek T; Erdoğan MM; Özçetinkaya Erdoğan S; Kazaz H; Tezcan E; Seyhan S Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol; 2021 Apr; 278(4):1089-1097. PubMed ID: 32995911 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Assessment of the EuroQol 5-Dimension Questionnaire for Detection of Clinically Significant Global Health-Related Quality-of-Life Improvement Following Functional Septorhinoplasty. Fuller JC; Levesque PA; Lindsay RW JAMA Facial Plast Surg; 2017 Mar; 19(2):95-100. PubMed ID: 27893020 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. [Application of the subjective and objective evaluation in functional rhinoplasty]. Ke X; Yang YC; Shen Y; Liu J; Huang JJ; Hong SL Zhonghua Er Bi Yan Hou Tou Jing Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2020 Mar; 55(3):223-229. PubMed ID: 32268690 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. [Quality of life after functional aesthetic septorhinoplasty in primary surgery vs. revision surgery-a monocentric study]. Riedel F; Wähmann M; Bran GM; Conder M; Bulut OC HNO; 2019 Mar; 67(3):192-198. PubMed ID: 30132128 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Evaluation of the effects of open and closed rhinoplasty on the psychosocial stress level and quality of life of rhinoplasty patients. Gökçe Kütük S; Arıkan OK J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg; 2019 Aug; 72(8):1347-1354. PubMed ID: 31078414 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Functional and Esthetic Outcomes of L-Shaped Augmentation Rhinoplasty in Indonesian Noses. Widodo DW; Asmoro SDP; Wardani RS; Affandi DA; Oriza IID Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol; 2023 May; 132(5):492-496. PubMed ID: 35656788 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The need for an objective measure in septorhinoplasty surgery: are we any closer to finding an answer? Andrews PJ; Choudhury N; Takhar A; Poirrier AL; Jacques T; Randhawa PS Clin Otolaryngol; 2015 Dec; 40(6):698-703. PubMed ID: 25943502 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Does septoplasty improve the quality of life in children? Yilmaz MS; Guven M; Akidil O; Kayabasoglu G; Demir D; Mermer H Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2014 Aug; 78(8):1274-6. PubMed ID: 24880925 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Perceptions and satisfaction of aesthetic outcome following secondary cleft rhinoplasty: evaluation by patients versus health professionals. Byrne M; Chan JC; O'Broin E J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2014 Oct; 42(7):1062-70. PubMed ID: 24581635 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Pediatric septoplasty and functional septorhinoplasty: A quality of life outcome study. Manteghi A; Din H; Bundogji N; Leuin SC Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2018 Aug; 111():16-20. PubMed ID: 29958602 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Evaluation of nasal patency by visual analogue scale/nasal obstruction symptom evaluation questionnaires and anterior active rhinomanometry after septoplasty: a retrospective one-year follow-up cohort study. Hsu HC; Tan CD; Chang CW; Chu CW; Chiu YC; Pan CJ; Huang HM Clin Otolaryngol; 2017 Feb; 42(1):53-59. PubMed ID: 27102375 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The Effect on Patient Satisfaction of the Postoperative Nasal Topographic, Demographic, and Functional Results of Open and Closed Septorhinoplasty Techniques. Metin M; Avcu M J Craniofac Surg; 2021 May; 32(3):868-873. PubMed ID: 33038179 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Vertical dome division: a quality-of-life outcome study. Lavinsky-Wolff M; Dolci JE; Camargo HL; Manzini M; Petersen S; Romanczuk S; Pizzoni R; Polanczyk CA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 2013 May; 148(5):758-63. PubMed ID: 23459703 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Patient-reported outcome measures in external and endonasal functional septorhinoplasty - A propensity score matching study. Gostian M; Stange T; Wurm J; Gostian AO Am J Otolaryngol; 2021; 42(1):102763. PubMed ID: 33152577 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]