229 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26967345)
1. Systematic classification of uterine cervical elongation in patients with pelvic organ prolapse.
Mothes AR; Mothes H; Fröber R; Radosa MP; Runnebaum IB
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2016 May; 200():40-4. PubMed ID: 26967345
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Systematic assessment of surgical complications in laparoscopically assisted vaginal hysterectomy for pelvic organ prolapse.
Mothes AR; Radosa MP; Runnebaum IB
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2015 Nov; 194():228-32. PubMed ID: 26451889
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Clinical Risk Factors for Uterine Cervical Elongation among Women with Pelvic Organ Prolapse.
Liu YY; Wang CL; Loo ZX; Lin KL; Long CY
Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2021 Sep; 18(17):. PubMed ID: 34501846
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Is cervical elongation associated with pelvic organ prolapse?
Berger MB; Ramanah R; Guire KE; DeLancey JO
Int Urogynecol J; 2012 Aug; 23(8):1095-103. PubMed ID: 22527546
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Traction on the cervix in theatre before anterior repair: Does it tell us when to perform a concomitant hysterectomy?
Foon R; Agur W; Kingsly A; White P; Smith P
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2012 Feb; 160(2):205-9. PubMed ID: 22129812
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Study of Prolapse-Induced Cervical Elongation.
Geoffrion R; Louie K; Hyakutake MT; Koenig NA; Lee T; Filipenko JD
J Obstet Gynaecol Can; 2016 Mar; 38(3):265-9. PubMed ID: 27106197
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Manchester Operation: An Effective Treatment for Uterine Prolapse Caused by True Cervical Elongation.
Park YJ; Kong MK; Lee J; Kim EH; Bai SW
Yonsei Med J; 2019 Nov; 60(11):1074-1080. PubMed ID: 31637890
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Risk factors for coexistence of cervical elongation in uterine prolapse.
Hsiao SM; Chang TC; Chen CH; Li YI; Shun CT; Lin HH
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2018 Oct; 229():94-97. PubMed ID: 30144728
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Defining Cervical Elongation: A Prospective Observational Study.
Nosti PA; Gutman RE; Iglesia CB; Park AJ; Tefera E; Sokol AI
J Obstet Gynaecol Can; 2017 Apr; 39(4):223-228. PubMed ID: 28413041
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Putting POP-Q to the test: does C - D = cervical length?
Williams KS; Rosen L; Pilkinton ML; Dhariwal L; Winkler HA
Int Urogynecol J; 2018 Jun; 29(6):881-885. PubMed ID: 28871354
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Diagnostic value of preoperative ultrasonography, cervical length measurement, and POP-Q examination in cervical elongation estimation.
Alay I; Kaya C; Karaca I; Yildiz S; Cengiz H; Ekin M; Yasar L
Int Urogynecol J; 2020 Dec; 31(12):2617-2623. PubMed ID: 32653969
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Anatomic outcomes after pelvic-organ-prolapse surgery: comparing uterine preservation with hysterectomy.
Marschalek J; Trofaier ML; Yerlikaya G; Hanzal E; Koelbl H; Ott J; Umek W
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2014 Dec; 183():33-6. PubMed ID: 25461349
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. [Expression and significance of elastin and fibulin-5 in anterior vaginal tissue of women with pelvic organ prolapse].
Li B; Zhang QF; Lin XY; Chen LL; Ouyang L; Zhang SL
Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi; 2009 Jul; 44(7):514-7. PubMed ID: 19957551
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Intraoperative cervix location and apical support stiffness in women with and without pelvic organ prolapse.
Swenson CW; Smith TM; Luo J; Kolenic GE; Ashton-Miller JA; DeLancey JO
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2017 Feb; 216(2):155.e1-155.e8. PubMed ID: 27615439
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Cervical amputation versus vaginal hysterectomy: a population-based register study.
Bergman I; Söderberg MW; Kjaeldgaard A; Ek M
Int Urogynecol J; 2017 Feb; 28(2):257-266. PubMed ID: 27530518
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Uterus preserving vaginal surgery versus vaginal hysterectomy for correction of female pelvic organ prolapse.
Iliev VN; Andonova IT
Pril (Makedon Akad Nauk Umet Odd Med Nauki); 2014; 35(1):243-7. PubMed ID: 24802202
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Comparison of connective tissue components in the uterine ligaments between women with and without pelvic organ prolapse.
Bildircin D; Kokcu A; Celik H; Sagir D; Kefeli M
Minerva Ginecol; 2014 Apr; 66(2):201-8. PubMed ID: 24848078
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Differential gene expression of extracellular-matrix-related proteins in the vaginal apical compartment of women with pelvic organ prolapse.
Wang H; Kira Y; Hamuro A; Takase A; Tachibana D; Koyama M
Int Urogynecol J; 2019 Mar; 30(3):439-446. PubMed ID: 29600404
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. [Comparison outcomes of three surgical procedures in treatment of severe pelvic organ prolapse and analysis of risk factors for genital prolapse recurrence].
Hu CD; Chen YS; Yi XF; Ding JX; Feng WW; Yao LQ; Huang J; Zhang Y; Hu WG; Zhu ZL; Hua KQ
Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi; 2011 Feb; 46(2):94-100. PubMed ID: 21426765
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. A new modification of the POPQ system--its effectiveness in the diagnosis of supravaginal elongation of the uterine cervix in cases with genital prolapse.
Antovska SV
Bratisl Lek Listy; 2008; 109(7):307-12. PubMed ID: 18792485
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
