These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
148 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26967528)
1. Patient Databases and Clinical Registries in Facial Plastic Surgery Research-Looking at Outcomes Data on a Broader Scale. Butts SC JAMA Facial Plast Surg; 2016 May; 18(3):220-1. PubMed ID: 26967528 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Big data in facial plastic and reconstructive surgery: from large databases to registries. Smith AM; Chaiet SR Curr Opin Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 2017 Aug; 25(4):273-279. PubMed ID: 28525400 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Characteristics of Digital Health Studies Registered in ClinicalTrials.gov. Chen CE; Harrington RA; Desai SA; Mahaffey KW; Turakhia MP JAMA Intern Med; 2019 Jun; 179(6):838-840. PubMed ID: 30801617 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Cosmetic Surgery National Data Bank Statistics. Aesthet Surg J; 2016 Apr; 36 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):1-29. PubMed ID: 27069249 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. NTDB® data points. Annual report 2008: V8 for 2008. Fantus RJ; Nathens AB Bull Am Coll Surg; 2009 Jan; 94(1):70-1. PubMed ID: 23505684 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Application of the h-Index in Academic Plastic Surgery. Therattil PJ; Hoppe IC; Granick MS; Lee ES Ann Plast Surg; 2016 May; 76(5):545-9. PubMed ID: 25422983 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. NTDB® data points. May Day. Fantus RJ; Mitchell FL Bull Am Coll Surg; 2007 Apr; 92(4):50-1. PubMed ID: 23513600 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Cosmetic Surgery National Data Bank Statistics. Aesthet Surg J; 2015 Jul; 35 Suppl 2():1-24. PubMed ID: 26115661 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. NTDB™ data points. The National Sample Project: a new application of the NTDB. Fantus RJ; Fildes J Bull Am Coll Surg; 2006 Feb; 91(2):44. PubMed ID: 23505673 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Facial plastic surgery database. Mendelsohn M; Conrad K J Otolaryngol; 1994 Feb; 23(1):1-5. PubMed ID: 8170012 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Differences in reported esophageal cancer resection outcomes between national clinical and administrative databases. Lapar DJ; Stukenborg GJ; Lau CL; Jones DR; Kozower BD J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2012 Nov; 144(5):1152-7. PubMed ID: 22938777 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. NTDB® data points. Underage and under the influence. Fantus RJ Bull Am Coll Surg; 2009 May; 94(5):63-4. PubMed ID: 23505687 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Using the NCDB to explore trends in cancer. Hopewood P Bull Am Coll Surg; 2017 Jul; 102(7):78-80. PubMed ID: 28885797 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. NTDB® data points. Annual report 2008: don't overlook the appendix. Fantus RJ; Fildes J Bull Am Coll Surg; 2009 Mar; 94(3):55-6. PubMed ID: 23505686 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. NTDB® data points. The university of alcohol. Fantus RJ Bull Am Coll Surg; 2009 Jun; 94(6):59-60. PubMed ID: 23505688 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. [The analysis of "Big Data" in clinical research]. Thiébaut R; Hejblum B; Richert L Rev Epidemiol Sante Publique; 2014 Feb; 62(1):1-4. PubMed ID: 24434249 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. NTDB™ data points. Same cover, but new version 3.0. Fantus RJ; Fildes J Bull Am Coll Surg; 2004 Jan; 89(1):50. PubMed ID: 23505671 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. NTDB® data points. Deposit the bull's-eye. Fantus RJ; Fildes J Bull Am Coll Surg; 2006 Jun; 91(6):58-9. PubMed ID: 23505674 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]