These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

190 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26967984)

  • 21. A joint investigation of semantic facilitation and semantic interference in continuous naming.
    Scaltritti M; Peressotti F; Navarrete E
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2017 May; 43(5):818-823. PubMed ID: 27929326
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. When Sufficiently Processed, Semantically Related Distractor Pictures Hamper Picture Naming.
    Matushanskaya A; Mädebach A; Müller MM; Jescheniak JD
    Exp Psychol; 2016 Nov; 63(6):307-317. PubMed ID: 28059032
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Selective and nonselective inhibition of competitors in picture naming.
    Shao Z; Meyer AS; Roelofs A
    Mem Cognit; 2013 Nov; 41(8):1200-11. PubMed ID: 23716003
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Distractor modality can turn semantic interference into semantic facilitation in the picture-word interference task: implications for theories of lexical access in speech production.
    Hantsch A; Jescheniak JD; Schriefers H
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2009 Nov; 35(6):1443-53. PubMed ID: 19857015
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Why the leash constrains the dog: the impact of semantic associations on sentence production.
    Sass K; Heim S; Sachs O; Theede K; Muehlhaus J; Krach S; Kircher T
    Acta Neurobiol Exp (Wars); 2010; 70(4):435-53. PubMed ID: 21196951
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Semantic interference from distractor pictures in single-picture naming: evidence for competitive lexical selection.
    Jescheniak JD; Matushanskaya A; Mädebach A; Müller MM
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2014 Oct; 21(5):1294-300. PubMed ID: 24687732
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. The semantic Stroop effect: An ex-Gaussian analysis.
    White D; Risko EF; Besner D
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2016 Oct; 23(5):1576-1581. PubMed ID: 26907601
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Feature overlap slows lexical selection: evidence from the picture-word interference paradigm.
    Vieth HE; McMahon KL; de Zubicaray GI
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2014; 67(12):2325-39. PubMed ID: 24830335
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Adaptation of a semantic picture-word interference paradigm for future language mapping with transcranial magnetic stimulation: A behavioural study.
    Jonen M; Heim S; Grünert M; Neuloh G; Sakreida K
    Behav Brain Res; 2021 Aug; 412():113418. PubMed ID: 34153427
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. A novel multi-word paradigm for investigating semantic context effects in language production.
    van Scherpenberg C; Abdel Rahman R; Obrig H
    PLoS One; 2020; 15(4):e0230439. PubMed ID: 32275715
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Neighing dogs: Semantic context effects of environmental sounds in spoken word production - a replication and extension.
    Brownsett SL; Mascelloni M; Gowlett G; McMahon KL; de Zubicaray GI
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2023 Sep; 76(9):1990-2000. PubMed ID: 36301012
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Neural correlates of semantic activation spreading on the path to picture naming in adults who stutter.
    Maxfield ND; Huffman JL; Frisch SA; Hinckley JJ
    Clin Neurophysiol; 2010 Sep; 121(9):1447-1463. PubMed ID: 20382559
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Picture-word interference in language production studies: Exploring the roles of attention and processing times.
    Bürki A; Madec S
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2022 Jul; 48(7):1019-1046. PubMed ID: 35389697
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Semantic priming over unrelated trials: evidence for different effects in word and picture naming.
    Vitkovitch M; Cooper-Pye E; Leadbetter AG
    Mem Cognit; 2006 Apr; 34(3):715-25. PubMed ID: 16933776
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Modeling the distributional dynamics of attention and semantic interference in word production.
    San José A; Roelofs A; Meyer AS
    Cognition; 2021 Jun; 211():104636. PubMed ID: 33647750
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. On the categorical nature of the semantic interference effect in the picture-word interference paradigm.
    Costa A; Alario FX; Caramazza A
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2005 Feb; 12(1):125-31. PubMed ID: 15948287
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Distractor strength and selective attention in picture-naming performance.
    Piai V; Roelofs A; Schriefers H
    Mem Cognit; 2012 May; 40(4):614-27. PubMed ID: 22200912
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Semantic interference in language production is due to graded similarity, not response relevance.
    Aristei S; Abdel Rahman R
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2013 Nov; 144(3):571-82. PubMed ID: 24140825
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Typicality effects in picture-word interference paradigm: An evaluation of the response exclusion hypothesis.
    Fang Y; Zhang J; Yin G; Hu S; Zhang E
    Scand J Psychol; 2015 Jun; 56(3):245-53. PubMed ID: 25656246
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Interference from related actions in spoken word production: Behavioural and fMRI evidence.
    de Zubicaray G; Fraser D; Ramajoo K; McMahon K
    Neuropsychologia; 2017 Feb; 96():78-88. PubMed ID: 28087234
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.